Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is still considered relatively contraindicated, without sufficient clinical evidence. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the results of toric IOL implantation in patients with FECD. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of 28 eyes of FECD patients and 84 eyes of healthy control patients who received toric IOLs during routine cataract surgery was performed. The outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and refractive residual astigmatism. RESULTS: The mean postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes were 0.15 ± 0.14 vs. 0.13 ± 0.17, respectively (P = 0.32), and 0.05 ± 0.08 vs. 0.06 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.95). The spherical equivalent in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was - 0.29 ± 0.43 vs. - 0.21 ± 0.50, respectively (P = 0.19). The preoperative corneal centroid astigmatism in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was 0.85 D@93° ± 2.42° vs. 0.23 D@68° ± 2.50°, respectively (P = 0.43), and the mean preoperative corneal astigmatism magnitude was 2.26 ± 1.1 D vs. 2.28 ± 1.03 D, respectively (P = 0.82). A trend toward higher postoperative refractive centroid astigmatism was found in the FECD eyes compared with the control eyes: 0.24 D@28° ± 0.57° vs. 0.03 D@127° ± 0.53°, respectively (P = 0.09). However, the mean refractive astigmatism magnitude was similar in FECD eyes and the healthy control eyes: 0.52 ± 0.31 D vs. 0.42 ± 0.31 D, respectively (P = 0.44) (D diopters). CONCLUSION: The postoperative refractive astigmatism (both centroid astigmatism and mean magnitude astigmatism) was no higher than 0.52 D in both groups. Therefore, FECD patients without corneal edema can be considered for toric IOLs.

Clinical outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is considered a contraindication for the implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, without sufficient corroborating evidence. A Retrospective, case-control study. Nineteen eyes of ten patients with grade 2-5 FECD (study group) and 57 healthy eyes of 57 patients (control group) who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, at the Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, were included. The target refraction was emmetropia for both groups. Two subgroups of IOLs were analyzed separately: extended depth of focus (EDOF), (9 eyes of FECD patients and 27 eyes of control patients) and multifocal IOLs (10 eyes of FECD patients and 30 eyes of control patients). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and refraction 6 weeks after the surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient perceptions of visual acuity, spectacle independence, photic phenomena and satisfaction scores, reported in a self-assessment questionnaire. FECD patients in the EDOF IOL subgroup had inferior uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = 0.007) and better uncorrected near visual acuity (P = 0.001) compared to the controls. They had less spectacle independence for the intermediate range (P = 0.01) and overall (P = 0.006). However, they did not have more photic phenomena. In the multifocal IOL subgroup, no significant differences were found between the FECD and the control group in visual acuity for all ranges and in spectacle independence. FECD patients had more photic phenomena than the controls (P = 0.006), but it did not interfere with daily life activities. There was no difference in post-operative mean spherical equivalent, patient reported visual perception, and general satisfaction between FECD and control patients in both groups. Our results suggest that presbyopia-correcting IOLs can be carefully considered in patients with grade 2-5 FECD, with slightly inferior results compared with healthy eyes.

Modified Corneal Incisions for Cataract Surgery in Patients Treated with Tamsulosin: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate modified anterior elongated corneal incisions as a simple technique to reduce the incidence and severity of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS), in patients taking tamsulosin (a selective α1a-adrenergic receptor antagonist). METHODS: This prospective case series was conducted at Meir Medical Center, a tertiary care facility in Israel. Included were 45 eyes of 39 male patients taking tamsulosin, and thus prone to IFIS. Patients underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with anterior elongated corneal incisions. The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of IFIS, the complication rate and the need for additional IFIS management techniques. The secondary outcome was to quantify the surgically induced astigmatism, using Alpin's vector analysis. The tamsulosin treatment period and pupil diameter during five stages of the surgery were also noted. RESULTS: The overall rate of IFIS was 33.33% (n = 15). The IFIS severity was rated as mild in 22.22% and moderate in 11.11% of the study eyes. No IFIS was noted in 66.67% of the eyes. There were no cases of severe IFIS, and no need for other IFIS management strategies. The complications rate was 2.22% (n = 1). Patients who developed IFIS had a significantly smaller pupil at the beginning of surgery (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in tamsulosin treatment period between patients with and without IFIS (p = 0.19). The centroid - the mean SIA vector was 0.51 D @ 18° ±1.5 D (SD). CONCLUSIONS: In tamsulosin treated patients, using modified corneal incisions may be feasible in order to reduce the incidence and severity of IFIS during cataract surgery. Future randomized studies are warranted.

Bilateral simultaneous central retinal vein occlusion in hyperviscosity retinopathy treated with systemic immunosuppressive therapy only.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation and imaging features of a patient presenting with bilateral central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), who was subsequently diagnosed with hyperviscosity retinopathy due to B cell lymphoproliferative disease, and had a good response to systemic immunosuppressive therapy. OBSERVATIONS: A clinical case report of an 87-year-old woman who presented with bilateral CRVO. Visual acuity, clinical examination, spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), color fundus photography and systemic evaluation were obtained. Ocular examination at presentation revealed bilateral CRVO, and OCT examination revealed significant central macular edema bilaterally. Six months after the diagnosis of hyperviscosity retinopathy and administration of systemic cyclophosphamide immunosuppressive therapy for B cell lymphoproliferative disease, most of the retinal hemorrhages resolved and partial resolution of the macular edema in the left eye was observed. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: This case describes the association between bilateral simultaneous CRVO and hyperviscosity. Under unique circumstances our patient received systemic therapy alone, without plasmapheresis. Although only limited therapy was applied, she didn't have deterioration or recurrent events; she had a small improvement in her macular edema and a significant improvement in her systemic functional state as well as reduction in her monoclonal IGM level.