Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office. STUDY DESIGN: In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location. RESULTS: Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges. IMPLICATIONS: Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Training hour requirements to provide acupuncture in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The National Academy of Medicine recommends, and Joint Commission requires, offering non-pharmacologic approaches to pain management, including acupuncture, to reduce opioid overuse in the United States. This study describes 2019 state training requirements to evaluate how they represent opportunities and barriers to increasing access to acupuncture. METHODS: We searched publicly available databases to identify Acupuncture Practice Acts and additional statutes and regulations pertaining to acupuncture training requirements on state licensure board websites. We then extracted state-specific acupuncture training requirements for individuals with and without a healthcare-related professional license. RESULTS: Thirty-three states allow physicians to provide acupuncture without requiring any additional training requirements, 11 states and the District of Columbia (DC) require 200-300 training hours, and three require physicians to obtain a separate acupuncture license. Three states have no regulatory agency ruling. Forty states require non-healthcare professionals to complete an accredited program of more than 1900 h and pass an examination. Twenty-three states have an Acupuncture Detoxification Specialist designation allowing individuals without a clinical professional license to provide auricular acupuncture for substance use disorder treatment after a 70-h training course. DISCUSSION: State-level training requirements are intended to increase safe and effective care, but variations represent a potential barrier to increasing the number of acupuncture providers in the United States. Allowing non-physician medical professionals to complete reduced training requirements for specific indications could be a model to increase access to acupuncture. The influence of training requirements on acupuncture access and opioid overuse needs examination.

A scoping review of acupuncture insurance coverage in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Increasing access to non-pharmacologic pain management modalities, including acupuncture, has the potential to reduce opioid overuse. A lack of insurance coverage for acupuncture could present a barrier for both patients and providers. The objective of this scoping review was to assess the existing literature on acupuncture insurance coverage in the United States and to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities. METHODS: We utilized the Arksey and O'Malley framework to guide our scoping review methodology. We followed a pre-determined study protocol for the level-one abstract and level-two full text screenings. We synthesized information into subject-area domains and identified knowledge gaps. RESULTS: We found a lack of published data on acupuncture coverage in 44 states, especially in the Midwest and the South. Where data were available, a large proportion of acupuncture users did not have insurance coverage. Consumer demand, state mandates, and efforts to reduce opioid use were motivations to cover acupuncture. Licensed acupuncturists were less likely to be reimbursed and were reimbursed at lower rates compared to physicians. Reported barriers encountered when implementing coverage included a lack of providers, challenges determining when to offer non-pharmacologic treatments, and a lack of evidence for clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: We found a lack of recent publications and data comparing regional coverage in the United States. A key challenge is that commercial insurance plan data are not in the public domain. Further research should assess insurance coverage implementation for acupuncture and measure the impact of policy changes on acupuncture utilization and rates of opioid overuse.

Perceptions of Pregnancy and Contraceptive Use: An In-Depth Study of Women in Los Angeles Methadone Clinics.

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, 2.1 million people in the United States were estimated to have an opioid use disorder. Although the disorder can be safely and effectively treated with prescription methadone, treatment is potentially long term and may span women's peak childbearing ages. Little is known about women's reproductive health needs while on methadone. METHODS: We interviewed 22 sexually active, nonpregnant women ages 21-39 years at two Los Angeles methadone clinics in 2016. The interviews were transcribed and coded by four researchers using thematic and open coding techniques. RESULTS: One-half of the women were nulliparous and 17 were in stable, monogamous relationships with men. Women reported a range of feelings and perceptions about pregnancy, but nearly all wanted to delay pregnancy until discontinuing methadone. However, many women indicated limited interest in preventing pregnancy because of the relative stability of their relationships, fear of infertility, and low perceived risk of pregnancy. These factors influenced contraceptive use. DISCUSSION: Women described mixed feelings about pregnancy and many ultimately felt that an unplanned pregnancy would be acceptable in the context of their relationships and uncertain fertility. These findings provide context for previous quantitative findings that women in methadone treatment have higher rates of unintended pregnancy and lower rates of contraceptive use than the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate information about pregnancy in the context of methadone treatment may help women to make proactive family planning decisions. Health care providers should discuss the guidelines for pregnancy on methadone and offer a range of options to help women achieve their reproductive goals.