Evaluating Feasibility of a Secondary Stroke Prevention Program.

Healthy lifestyles including exercise and diet can reduce stroke risk, but stroke survivors often lack guidance to modify their lifestyles after hospital discharge. We evaluated the implementation of a new, secondary stroke prevention program involving supervised exercise, multidisciplinary education and coaching to address modifiable risk factors. The group-based program involved face-to-face and telehealth sessions. The primary outcomes were feasibility, examined via service information (referrals, uptake, participant demographics and costs), and participant acceptability (satisfaction and attendance). Secondary outcomes examined self-reported changes in lifestyle factors and pre-post scores on standardized clinical tests (e.g., waist circumference and 6-Minute Walk (6MWT)). We ran seven programs in 12 months, and 37 people participated. Attendance for education sessions was 79%, and 30/37 participants completed the full program. No adverse events occurred. Participant satisfaction was high for 'relevance' (100%), 'felt safe to exercise' (96%) and 'intend to continue' (96%). Most participants (88%) changed (on average) 2.5 lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, smoking and alcohol). Changes in clinical outcomes seemed promising, with some being statistically significant, e.g., 6MWT (MD 59 m, 95% CI 38 m to 80,159 m, p < 0.001) and waist circumference (MD -2.1 cm, 95%CI -3.9 cm to -1.4 cm, p < 0.001). The program was feasible to deliver, acceptable to participants and seemed beneficial for health. Access to similar programs may assist in secondary stroke prevention.

One-Quarter of People Leave Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation with Physical Capacity for Community Ambulation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ability to walk in the community is important for independence and participation in life roles, but is difficult for many people following stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of people with stroke with the physical capacity to be independent community ambulators at discharge from a publicly funded inpatient rehabilitation setting. METHOD: Consecutive medical records were audited to collate walking outcome at discharge, and to clarify if people with stroke had potential to walk independently in the community as defined by 4 criteria: independence with stairs; ability to traverse slopes and inclines; walking speed of .8m/s or more; and walking distance 367 m or higher on 6-Minute Walk Test. RESULTS: While 80% of the 124 persons with stroke could walk indoors, only 27% could perform 4 essential skills needed to walk independently in the community at discharge from hospital. The proportion that met each criterion was 52% for stairs, 39% for slopes and inclines, 58% for speed, and 40% for distance. For the overall sample, mean (standard deviation) walking speed was .90 (.33) m/s, and distance for 6-Minute Walk Test was 349.6 (146.5) m. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A retrospective review found that three quarters of stroke survivors lacked physical capacity for 4 skills required to walk independently in the community at the time of discharge from a public inpatient rehabilitation. Our findings recommend that people with stroke have access to outpatient physical rehabilitation to optimize walking outcome.

Behavioral Mapping of Patient Activity to Explore the Built Environment During Rehabilitation.

AIM: To explore the use of a rehabilitation-focused behavioral mapping method to identify changes in patient physical activity, location, and social interaction following the relocation of a rehabilitation ward. BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation wards are unique healthcare environments where patient activity is encouraged to improve recovery. Little is known about the impact of building design on patient behavior within a rehabilitation setting. We examined this issue when a rehabilitation ward was relocated without altering other aspects of the healthcare service. METHOD: The setting was a publicly funded inpatient general rehabilitation ward with a separate therapy area. Before and after ward relocation, patient behavior (location, physical, and social activities) was observed at 10-min intervals between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Patients and staff performed their usual activities during data collection. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients participated in the old ward and 24 in the new ward, resulting in 1,150 and 1,200 observation time points, respectively. Patient location and behaviors were similar between wards ( p > .05). Participants were in bedrooms for more than half of the observations (67% old ward, 58% new ward), sitting down (62.8% old ward, 59.0% new ward), and alone (42.0% old ward, 38.0% new ward). Design features, such as separation of the therapy area and ward, may have impacted on patient behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The rehabilitation-focused behavioral mapping method provided a rich description of relevant patient behaviors, indicating that it is a feasible and useful method for exploring the impact of the built environment in rehabilitation settings.