Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia: Postoperative pain management after Nuss repair for pectus excavatum.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Postoperative pain management is a significant challenge in patients undergoing Nuss repair for pectus excavatum chest wall deformity. Therapeutic anesthetic options primarily include patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and cryoanalgesia. However, TEA is limited to inpatient use and both TEA and cryoanalgesia can result in neurologic injury. The novel technique of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane regional analgesia has been used recently in our patients undergoing the Nuss repair and has shown impressive pain relief, but without the potential complications of other modalities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) postoperative pain management outcomes were studied as compared to TEA. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with severe pectus excavatum undergoing Nuss repair and placement of ultrasound-guided ESPB were each paired to a historical cohort control patient with TEA postoperative pain management. The cohort patient match was defined by age (± 2 years), gender, and CT pectus index (± 15%). Study variables included hospital length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and pain medication usage. RESULTS: Pain scores as measured by area under the curve per hour (Day 1: 2.72 (SD = 1.37) vs. 3.90 (SD = 1.81), P = 0.006; Day 2: 2.83 (SD = 1.32) vs. 3.97 (SD = 1.82), P = 0.007) and oral morphine equivalent (OME) pain medication usage (Day 1: 11.9 (SD = 4.9) vs 56.0 (SD = 32.2), P < 0.001; Day 2: 14.7 (SD = 7.1) vs. 38.0 (SD = 21.7), P < 0.001) were higher for the first two postoperative days in the ESPB group. However, mean hospital LOS was nearly one day shorter for ESPB patients (3.78 (SD = 0.82) vs. 2.90 (SD = 0.87), P < 0.001) who were discharged home with the catheter in place until removal, typically at 5-7 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided ESPB is thus a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to TEA in postoperative pain management after Nuss repair and results in decreased hospital stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Non-Radiographic Severity Measurement of Pectus Excavatum.

BACKGROUND: To avoid the radiation exposure of CT imaging and the expense of CT or MRI studies, we sought to develop a non-radiographic severity measurement of pectus excavatum based on 3D photogrammetric imaging. METHODS: Over 28 mo, ten consecutive patient volunteers with pectus excavatum underwent 3D stereophotogrammetric imaging. The surface width to surface depth ratio (Surface Lengths Pectus Index), the chest deformity's surface area to total chest surface area (Pectus Surface Area Ratio), and the chest deformity's volume to total chest volume (Pectus Volume Ratio) were calculated. Simple linear regression analysis compared the Surface Lengths Pectus Index, Pectus Surface Area Ratio, and Pectus Volume Ratio calculations each to the corresponding known CT pectus index. RESULTS: The correlation between CT pectus index versus Surface Lengths Pectus Index yielded an R-squared value of 0.7637 and a P value of 0.0013. A CT pectus index of 3.4 or greater (eight patients) corresponded to a Surface Lengths Pectus Index of 1.86 or greater (six patients). The CT pectus index versus Pectus Surface Area Ratio (R-squared = 0.4627, P = 0.0305) and the CT pectus index versus the Pectus Volume Ratio (R-squared = 0.3048, P = 0.0990) demonstrated less correlation. CONCLUSION: Surface Lengths Pectus Index corresponds to the CT pectus index and may be adequate to determine severity of pectus excavatum in some patients.