Feasibility of Laboratory Equipment-Based Simulation Methods to Assess the Impact of Vehicle Transportation on Product Quality of mAb Dosing Solutions.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) products for intravenous (IV) administration generally require aseptic compounding with a commercially available diluent. When the administration site is located away from the preparation site, the prepared dosing solution may need to be transported in a vehicle. The impact of vehicle transportation on the product quality of mAbs needs to be evaluated to define safe handling and transportation conditions for dosing solutions. The design and execution of actual vehicle transportation studies require considerable resources and time. In this study, we systematically developed three different laboratory equipment-based methods that simulate vehicle transportation stresses: orbital shaker (OS), reciprocating shaker (RS), and vibration test system (VTS)-based simulation methods. We assessed their feasibility by comparing the impact on product quality caused by each simulated method with that caused by actual vehicle transportation. Without residual polysorbate 80 (PS80) in the mAb dosing solution, transportation via a cargo van led to a considerable increase in the subvisible particle counts and did not meet the compendial specifications for the light obscuration method. However, the presence of as low as 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution stabilized the mAb against vehicle transportation stresses and met the compendial specifications. Vehicle transportation of an IV bag with headspace resulted in negligible micro air bubbles and foaming in both PS80-free and PS80-containing mAb dosing solutions. These phenomena were found to be comparable to the VTS-based simulated method. However, the OS- and RS-based simulated methods formed significantly more micro air bubbles and foaming in an IV bag with headspace than either actual vehicle transportation or the VTS-based simulated method. Despite the higher interfacial stress (micro air bubbles and foaming) in the dosing solution created by the OS- and RS-based simulated methods, 0.0004%w/v (4 ppm) PS80 in the dosing solution was found to be sufficient to stabilize the mAb. The study shows that under appropriate simulated conditions, the OS-, RS-, and VTS-based simulated methods can be used as practical and meaningful models to assess the impact and risk of vehicle transportation on the quality of mAb dosing solutions.

Transportation of mAb Dosing Solution in Intravenous Bag: Impact of Manual, Vehicle, and Pneumatic Tube System Transportation Methods on Product Quality.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) products for intravenous (IV) administration generally require aseptic compounding with a commercial diluent within a pharmacy. The prepared dosing solution in the IV bag may be transported to the dosing location via manual, vehicular, pneumatic tube system (PTS), or a combination of these methods. In this study, the type and level of physical stresses associated with these three methods and their product quality impact for relatively sensitive and stable mAbs were assessed. Vibration was found to be the main stress associated with manual and vehicle transportation methods, although this was at a relatively low level (<1 GRMS/Root-Mean-Square Acceleration). Shock and drop events, at relatively low levels, were also observed with these methods. PTS transportation showed substantially more intense shock, vibration, and drop stresses and the measured levels were up to 91 G/force of acceleration or deceleration, 3.7 GRMS and 39 G, respectively. Using a foam padding insert for PTS transportation reduced the shock level considerably (91 G to 59 G). Transportation of mAb dosing solutions in IV bags via different methods including PTS transportation variables caused a small increase in the subvisible particle counts and there was no change in submicrometer particle distribution. No visible particles and no significant change to soluble aggregate levels were observed after transportation. Strategies such as removal of IV bag headspace prior to transport and in-line filtration poststress reduced the subvisible particles counts. All tested transportation conditions showed negligible impact on other product quality attributes tested. Removal of IV bag headspace prior to PTS transport prevented formation of micro air bubbles and foaming compared to the unaltered IV bag. This study shows examples where manual, vehicle, and PTS transport methods did not significantly impact product quality, and provides evidence that mAb products that are appropriately stabilized in the dosing solution (e.g., with a surfactant) can be transported via a PTS.