Sydney Local Health District's Integrated Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.

Introduction: Sydney Local Health District (SLHD) is a local health district in the state of New South Wales in Australia responsible for providing health services to the centre and inner west of the Sydney metropolitan area. SLHD adopted, during the COVID-19 pandemic, an integrated virtual and community care approach to manage quarantine and protect the health and wellbeing of the population. Description: The case study describes the roles of the different agencies and teams in the first six months of the pandemic across four key functions of 1) rapid screening and testing; 2) reaching the community; 3) effective quarantine and ongoing care; and 4) infrastructure, pathology and staff education. Discussion: The "whole of system" approach proved to be an effective method of delivering care that reduced community anxiety, improved and created relationships between existing and new internal and external stakeholders, and changed the community and health sector's perspective on the importance of virtual care. Conclusion: This case study describes the importance of well-integrated, decentralised and funded public health system in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Understanding for whom, how and why Sydney Local Health District's Integrated Response was Effective in Addressing COVID-19: A Critical Realist Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Australia has been comparatively effective in preventing the transmission of COVID-19. The Sydney Local Health District [SLHD] used a "whole of health" integrated approach to respond to the pandemic. The aim of this study was to understand for whom, how and why this response worked, to inform a sustainable system transformation. METHODS: A critical realist qualitative study was conducted with 20 purposively selected key informants. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analysed using thematic analysis guided by abduction and retroduction. The five strategies of the WHO integrated people-centred health services framework was used to guide the overall study. RESULTS: An enabling environment of a strong governance, emergency preparedness, a committed and adaptable workforce, and a strong core infrastructure underpinned SLHD's effective response. With a culture of embracing innovation, the district adapted virtual care to effectively quarantine people through their special health accommodation, and coordinate care across tertiary and community services. The established interagency relationships prior to the pandemic, enabled service directors to quickly integrate their services, which empowered and engaged the community [and staff], working across relevant sectors to provide care "where the people are"; reaching marginalised populations, and reducing community transmission. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The SLHD's progress towards a 'whole of health' approach, empowered and enabled the district to effectively work within and across sectors to address the pandemic in a people-centred manner. Sustaining the contextual conditions and mechanisms, that facilitated effective integration, will be beneficial beyond the pandemic.

The Australian Rural Health Research Collaboration: building collaborative population health research in rural and remote NSW.

The health problems faced by rural and remote communities are complex and not amenable to simple or short-term solutions. The Australian Rural Health Research Collaboration, which comprises rural research centres, area health services and policy makers in NSW, investigates these problems. Founded in 2002, it has grown to become the leading rural research collaboration in Australia. It aims to: conduct high quality research; build the capacity of researchers and clinicians; and encourage the translation of research evidence into practice for the benefit of rural and remote communities. The success of the Collaboration is illustrated by the increase in research outputs, funds generated, the strength of the relationships between partners and the ability to address complex research problems such as the mental health of rural and remote communities often deemed too difficult or expensive to include in metropolitan-based research. Keys to success have been the inclusive public health ethos, the participation of senior researchers and service managers, the critical mass of researchers achieved through collaboration and effective leadership and governance. This demonstrates the value of supporting cooperative research and capacity building in rural and remote areas where the size of research groups is small and where effective multi-disciplinary and co-operative research can pay dividends.