Designing the first culturally-sensitive stigma survey tailored for adolescents: RN-CSS.

AIMS: The Red Noses Culturally-Sensitive Stigma Survey (RN-CSS) contributes to the underexplored research domain of adolescents' stigmatising attitudes and behaviours towards peers with mental health difficulties and mental healthcare services. It also addresses the need for comprehensive and culturally-sensitive tools to assess stigma in this context. METHODS: Drawing on insights from focus groups and building upon the existing Stigma in Global Context-Mental Health Study, we have successfully developed and implemented the first culturally-sensitive stigma survey tailored for school-aged adolescents of different migration/cultural backgrounds. The questionnaire includes an unlabelled case vignette depicting a peer with symptoms of depression and gathers data on various domains, including (1) sociodemographic variables; (2) education-related information; (3) COVID-19; (4) perceptions of mental health difficulties and mental healthcare services (i.e. severity assessment, causal attributions, care recommendations, personal stigma, perceived stigma, and service stigma); (5) subjective wellbeing and familiarity with mental health difficulties; (6) social support; (7) school context; (8) bullying; and (9) knowledge of anti-stigma campaigns. RESULTS: Our final sample comprises 5075 pupils from 38 secondary schools in Flanders, Belgium. CONCLUSIONS: In this article, we present the study's background and rationale, the development of the questionnaire, and the sampling and recruitment methods employed. Furthermore, we provide a summary of the sample characteristics and preliminary descriptive results of the RN-CSS. Subsequent empirical studies will address the research objectives outlined in this protocol paper. The research opportunities provided by the developed materials and dataset are being discussed.

Agency in urgency and uncertainty. Vaccines and vaccination in European media discourses.

Although Covid-19 was not the first pandemic, it was unique in the scale and intensity with which societies responded. Countries reacted differently to the threat posed by the new virus. The public health crisis affected European societies in many ways. It also influenced the way the media portrayed vaccines and discussed factors related to vaccine hesitancy. Europeans differed in their risk perceptions, attitudes towards vaccines and vaccine uptake. In European countries, Covid-19-related discourses were at the centre of media attention for many months. This paper reports on a media analysis which revealed significant differences as well as some similarities in the media debates in different countries. The study focused on seven European countries and considered two dimensions of comparison: between the pre-Covid period and the beginning of the Covid pandemic period, and between countries. The rich methodological approach, including linguistics, semantic field analysis and discourse analysis of mainstream news media, allowed the authors to explore the set of meanings related to vaccination that might influence actors' agency. This approach led the authors to redefine vaccine hesitancy in terms of characteristics of the "society in the situation" rather than the psychological profile of individuals. We argue that vaccine hesitancy can be understood in terms of agency and temporality. This dilemma of choice that transforms the present into an irreversible past and must be taken in relation to an uncertain future, is particularly acute under the pressure of urgency and when someone's health is at stake. As such, it is linked to how vaccine meaning is co-produced within public discourses.