[Medical Treatments in Oncology 2023].

Medical Oncology since the beginning of the new millennium has recognized a great positive evolution in the care of cancer. In fact, for more than 60 years the two classical pillars of the antineoplastic therapy were hormone therapies mainly applied in breast, prostate and thyroid cancer, and chemotherapy seldom curative and heavily toxic. Nowadays some new treatments are available thanks to the advances in genomics, proteomics and molecular biology of tumor cells either to the advances in immunology studies. Specific pathways in cancer cells have been recognized and hit by targeted drugs. Monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, cellular therapies and vaccines are the new tools for oncologists. The last discovery is the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which combine monoclonal antibodies with cytotoxic drugs. Unfortunately, these impressive advances have caused the appearance of new scientific, social, and financial problems. All these topics are discussed in the article.

Guideline-Based Follow-Up Outcomes in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor With Low Risk of Recurrence: A Report From the Italian Sarcoma Group.

Importance: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) follow-up is recommended by international guidelines, but data on the role of follow-up in patients with low relapse risk are missing. For these patients, the potential benefit of anticipating recurrence detection should be weighed against psychological burden and radiologic examination loads in terms of costs and radiation exposure. Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of guideline-based follow-up in low-risk GIST. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving Italian Sarcoma Group reference institutions evaluated patients with GIST who underwent surgery between January 2001 and June 2019. Median follow-up time was 69.2 months. Data analysis was performed from December 15, 2022, to March 20, 2023. Patients with GIST at low risk according to Armed Forces Institute of Pathology criteria were included provided adequate clinical information was available: primary site, size, mitotic index, surgical margins, and 2 or more years of follow-up. Exposures: All patients underwent follow-up according to European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of tests needed to identify a relapse according to ESMO guidelines follow-up plan. Secondary outcomes included relapse rate, relapse timing, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), GIST-specific survival (GIST-SS), postrelapse OS, secondary tumor rates, and theoretical ionizing radiation exposure. An exploratory end point, new follow-up schedule proposal for patients with low-risk GIST according to the observed results, was also assessed. Results: A total of 737 patients (377 men [51.2%]; median age at diagnosis, 63 [range, 18-86] years) with low-risk GIST were included. Estimated 5-year survival rates were 95.5% for DFS, 99.8% for GIST-SS, and 96.1% for OS. Estimated 10-year survival rates were 93.4% for DFS, 98.1% for GIST-SS, and 91.0% for OS. Forty-two patients (5.7%) experienced disease relapse during follow-up (9 local, 31 distant, 2 both), of which 9 were detected after 10 or more years. This translated into approximately 1 relapse detected for every 170 computed tomography scans performed, with a median radiation exposure of 80 (IQR, 32-112) mSv per patient. Nongastric primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.14-3.83; P = .02), and KIT mutation (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.05-7.27; P = .04) were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Second tumors affected 187 of 737 patients (25%), of which 56 were detected during follow-up and represented the primary cause of death in these patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study on patients affected by low-risk GISTs, the risk of relapse was low despite a follow-up across 10 or more years. These data suggest the need to revise follow-up schedules to reduce the anxiety, costs, and radiation exposure of currently recommended follow-up strategy.

The psychological impact of sarcoma on affected patients.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcoma diagnosis and its treatment trajectory may deeply affect the somatopsychic balance of patients and their caregivers. This systematic review aimed at deepening the understanding of sarcoma's impact on the entire family unit involved in the illness experience on a physical (e.g. fatigue), psychological (e.g. mental health, affective regulation, defense mechanisms), and interpersonal (e.g. social isolation, loneliness) level. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The literature search led to the identification and subsequent inclusion of 44 articles focused on sarcoma patients. Results were classified into seven categories: Quality of Life, worries and distress, anxiety and depression, suicide ideation, financial and occupational consequences, unmet needs, and coping strategies. Our search identified only one study focusing on informal caregivers, thus we could not perform a systematic review on these results. RESULTS: Our findings underlined the traumatic impact of the sarcoma diagnosis. Patients can experience an impoverished emotional life, somatization, social withdrawal, difficulty in decision-making, increased feelings of discouragement and demoralization, and profound experiences of helplessness and vulnerability. Moreover, they seemed to display anxiety and depression and might present a higher suicide incidence than the general population. CONCLUSION: Our review highlighted that the psychosocial aftermath of sarcoma patients should guide institutions and healthcare professionals toward the design of assessment and intervention models that could contemplate the different dimensions of their suffering. Furthermore, it points out that there is still a lack of evidence regarding the psychosocial impact affecting sarcoma patients' caregivers.

The rare entity of gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas: An Italian multicenter retrospective study in high-volume referral centers.

BACKGROUND: After a huge efficacy of imatinib in treating patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) was proven, a maximum effort was made to make a differential diagnosis between GISTs and gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas (GI-LMS), showing the latter to be an extremely rare tumor entity. Limited data on GI-LMS biology, clinical behavior and drug-sensibility are available, and the clinical decision-making in this subgroup of patients is usually challenging. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective observational study on patients with diagnosed GI-LMS from 2004 to 2020 within six high-volume referral centers in Italy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients had diagnosis of KIT-negative GI-LMS confirmed by sarcoma-expert pathologist. The most common site of origin was the intestine. Twenty-two patients had localized disease and underwent surgery: with a median follow-up of 72 months, median disease-free survival was 42 months. Overall survival (OS)-rate at 5 years was 73% and median OS was 193 months. Five out of 10 patients with local relapse received a salvage surgery, and 2/5 remained with no evidence of disease. Thirteen patients received neoadjuvant (6) or adjuvant (7) chemotherapy, and 2/13 patients remained free from relapse. The median OS for patients with metastatic LMS was 16.4 months. CONCLUSION: GI-LMS is very rare and extremely aggressive subgroup of sarcomas with a high tendency to systemic spread. Localized GI-LMS at diagnosis may be cured if treated with adequate surgery with or without (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy, while de-novo metastatic disease appeared to have a poor prognosis. Clinical effort to understand GI-LMS biology and clinical behavior and to develop active treatment strategy, especially for metastatic-disease, is warranted.

Chemotherapy in patients with localized angiosarcoma of any site: A retrospective european study.

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively investigated the role of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma. METHODS: We selected all patients with primary, localized angiosarcoma, who had received radical surgery between January 2005 and December 2019 at 33 European sarcoma reference centers. The primary objective was to compare the outcome of patients who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy versus those who did not, in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). To reduce the risk of confounding due to imbalance, a propensity-score matching(PSM) was performed. Finally, subgroups analysis was performed according to tumor site, tumor size (< 50 mm or ≥ 50 mm) and patients predicted 10-years OS according to the nomogram sarculator (two different cutoff-values were applied: ≤ 33% or > 33% and < 60% or ≥ 60%). RESULTS: 362 patients were analyzed: 149 (41.2%; treated group) received (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and 213 (58.6%; control group) did not. The median follow-up for the OS endpoint was 5.1 years (95% CI: 4.0-5.5). The OS-HR was 0.58 (95%CI: 0.40-0.83; p-value = 0.003) in the univariate analysis and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.38-1.43; p = 0.367) in the PSM analysis. The DFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.57-0.98; p-value = 0.036) in the univariate analysis, and 0.91 (95% CI:0.56-1.48; p-value = 0.7) in the PSM analysis. The DMFS-HR was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55-1.02; p-value = 0.065) in univariate analysis and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.53-1.61; p-value = 0.769) in the PSM analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed no heterogeneity of results in strata of tumor site. On the contrary, there was a trend for heterogeneity according to tumor size and patient's risk of death. For all the endpoints analyzed, patients with tumors smaller than 50 mm or at lower risk of death seem to have no benefit from chemotherapy, while patients with larger tumors or at higher risk of death at 10 years seem to derive substantial benefit. CONCLUSION: This large, retrospective study suggests that patients affected by > 50 mm and/or high-risk primary, localized angiosarcoma could benefit from (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy.

A Pharmacological Analysis of the Activity and Failure of the Medical Treatment of High-Grade Osteosarcoma.

Osteosarcomas (OSs) are a group of neoplasms originating from bone cells, usually presenting in three specific age groups: children, young adults, and the elderly. High-grade OS is an extremely malignant tumor mainly due to evolution into metastatic disease, usually in the lungs. Survival of these patients has improved since the 1980s thanks to close cooperation between oncologists, oncological surgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Unfortunately, no progress has been made in the last 30 years and new, more effective drugs are needed. This article reviews the biological and pharmacological basis of the treatment of OS. Models of clinical pharmacology of the active drugs, toxic effects and reasons for primary and secondary resistance to old and new drugs are discussed.

Salvage Therapy in Advanced Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is dismal, with median overall survival (OS) of 8-12 months. The role of second-line therapy has been inconsistently investigated over the last 20 years. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of salvage treatment in pretreated adult type STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) excluded. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized phase II/phase III trials exploring second- or beyond therapy lines in pretreated metastatic STS. Two independent investigators extracted data; the quality of eligible studies was resolved by consensus. Hazard ratio (HR) of death and progression (OS and progression-free survival [PFS]) and odds ratio (OR) for response rate (RR) were pooled in a fixed- or random-effects model according to heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane's risk of bias tool, and publication bias with funnel plots. RESULTS: Overall, 10 randomized trials were selected. The pooled HR for death was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.9). Second-line therapy reduced the risk of progression by 49% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.76). This translated into an absolute benefit in OS and PFS by 3.3 and 1.6 months, respectively. Finally, RR with new agents or chemotherapy doublets translated from 4.3% to 7.6% (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.22-2.50). CONCLUSION: Better survival is achieved in patients treated with salvage therapies (chemotherapy, as single or multiple agents or targeted biological agents). A 3-months gain in OS and an almost double RR is observed. Second lines also attained a reduction by 50% the risk of progression. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is some evidence that salvage therapies after first-line failure are able to improve outcome in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Trabectedin, gemcitabine-based therapy, and pazopanib are currently approved drugs used after conventional upfront treatment. This meta-analysis reviews the benefit of new agents used in randomized trials in comparison with no active treatments or older agents for recurrent/progressed STS. The results show that modern drugs confer a statistically significant 3-month benefit in terms of overall survival, and an increase in response rate. Despite a limited improvement in outcome, currently approved second-line therapy should be offered to patients with good performance status.

Long-term treatment with eribulin in heavily pretreated women with metastatic breast cancer: a case series.

During the last decades, much effort has been made to develop and test treatments for advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) able to prolong survival and improve patients' quality of life. In this regard, eribulin represents one of the most recent and interesting discoveries. This tubulin-targeting chemotherapy demonstrated a survival benefit in MBC women who progressed after at least two prior lines of chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic disease (prior therapies should have included an anthracycline and a taxane, in either adjuvant or metastatic setting). Here, we described five cases of heavily pretreated MBC patients who experienced long-lasting control of disease with eribulin.

[The importance of mutational status in prognosis and therapy of GIST]. / Importanza delle mutazioni nella prognosi e terapia medica dei GIST.

GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in gastrointestinal tract and are thought to derive from the cells of Cajal or their precursors that have a constitutional mutation in KIT and PDGFRA genes. There are KIT and PDGFRA genes mutations detected before the start of therapy that are believed to be related to GIST pathogenesis and some secondary mutations causing drug resistance and progression of disease. The most common KIT mutations are detected in exon 11 (66-71%), exon 9 (10-13%), exon 13,14,17 (1% each). PDGFRA mutations (8%) are described in exon 18 (5-6%), 12 (1%) and 14 (1%). No mutations are detected in 5-10% of tumors and those subtypes are called wild type GIST (WT). Imatinib mesilate is a selective inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRA with an antityrosine kinase activity (TKI) used in advanced or metastatic GIST as well as in adjuvant setting after complete resection of neoplasm. Imatinib has radically changed the therapy and prognosis of GIST, but sensitivity of the disease is different on the basis of leading mutations. GIST KIT exon 11 mutated manifests response rate in 80% of cases, exon 9 in 40% and GIST WT in 14%. PDGFRA shows a mild sensitivity to drug (66%) except the exon 18 D842 V mutation which is totally resistant. Unfortunately up to 15% of GIST have a primary resistance to imatinib that means progression of the disease within 6-12 months after the start of therapy. Another 40-50% of GIST develops a secondary resistance after >24 months of TKI treatment. Biopsy of progressing GIST shows multiple clonal origins with distinct mutational changes. Secondary resistance occurs almost exclusively in KIT mutated GIST with the appearances of T670I gatekeeper secondary mutation and less common in 14, 17, 18 exons. After progression of disease second line therapy is represented by sunitinib malate that overcomes the most common resistant mutations excepted PGDFRA D842V. Again, after few months of treatment, new different mutations appear and the disease progresses. Regorafenib is the third line therapy but too few data relates mutational status and regorafenib activity. In adjuvant setting only imatinib has a role. Two important studies (the USA ACOSOG Z 9001 and the German-Scandinavian study) fail to demonstrate that a specific mutation can predict a better DFS and OS in treated patients. On the contrary, volume of the tumor, number of mitosis and site of GIST are strong prognostic and predictive factors. In conclusion mutational analysis in GIST is at present more useful in metastatic setting than in adjuvant therapy. The insurgence of primary and secondary mutations during therapy is a fundamental step for disease progression.

A phase 2 trial of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent nonresectable chondrosarcomas expressing platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α or -ß: An Italian Sarcoma Group study.

BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcoma (CS) is a rare and heterogeneous sarcoma in which, after failure of surgery and radiotherapy, chemotherapy plays only a marginal role. Different molecular pathways have been shown to be activated in CS; in particular, both isoforms of platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) are expressed and phosphorylated. These observations prompted investigation of the activity of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with advanced CS in a phase 2 trial. METHODS: Between January 2007 and June 2009, patients with metastatic, nonresectable CS were treated with 400 mg of IM administered twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Two criteria determined patient trial eligibility: ≥ 1 prior line of chemotherapy and immunohistochemical expression of either PDGFR-α or PDGFR-ß. The primary objective of the trial was objective response. As secondary objectives, the authors selected progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months, overall survival, and clinical benefit (EUDRACT number 2006-006446-33). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled and all demonstrated PDGFR positivity and phosphorylation. No objective response was demonstrated. The 4-month PFS rate was 31% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 16%-53%). The median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI, 6 months-15 months). Neither long-lasting freedom from disease progression nor clinical benefit was observed. The IM dose was temporarily reduced in 60%15 of the patients because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: IM was found to be relatively well-tolerated, but failed to demonstrate meaningful clinical activity in terms of both objective response and freedom from disease progression. Advanced CS remains an incurable disease, and effective targeted therapies are still awaited.

Vinorelbine and fluorouracil plus leucovorin combination (ViFL) in patients with anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was designed in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine (VNB), fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. METHODS: From 12/2003 to 12/2007, 51 women (median age 59) were treated. Performance status (PS) (ECOG) was 0-2 (median 0). The chemotherapy consisted of VNB 25 mg/sqm on day 1 added to FU and LV (following De Gramont schedule) on day 1 and 2. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. 518 cycles of CT were administered (median 12). Most common sites of metastatic spread were: bone, liver, lymph nodes, lung. RESULTS: We recorded three cases of G4 neuthropenia and in one case it was febrile; no others G4 toxicities were seen. G3 toxicities were more common, especially neuthropenia (8 patients) asthenia (4) mucositis (2) and Hand-Foot Syndrome (2). Overall response rate was 27.5% (14 patients had a PR) and disease control rate was 76.5%; 12 patients experienced disease progression. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7.70 months and overall survival (OS) was 18.70 months. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that the ViFL regimen has substantial activity in patients with MBC already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The combination may be considered a valid choice for the treatment of MBC. Better survival results were seen in patients with visceral metastases than bone involvement. The low response rate shows that the ViFL regimen is not suitable for the neoadjuvant setting.

The retinoblastoma family member pRb2/p130 is an independent predictor of survival in human soft tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE: pRb2/p130, a member of the Retinoblastoma gene family, has been shown to be a powerful prognostic factor in several malignancies. We sought to evaluate pRb2/p130 protein expression and its clinical effect in patients affected with soft tissue sarcomas (STS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Expression of pRb2/p130 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections in 41 STSs. Results obtained were correlated with clinicopathologic variables and disease-free and overall survival (OS) in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Expression of pRb2/p130 was diminished in 25 (61%) tumors, whereas the remaining ones (39%) were classified as high expressors. No correlation between pRb2/p130 expression and clinicopathologic variables was observed. However, a direct relationship between pRb2/p130 expression and clinical outcome of the patients was found in the subgroup of nonmetastatic tumors (n = 31). In univariate analysis, reduced pRb2/p130 expression was a negative prognostic factor and correlated with shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.017) survival. In multivariate analysis, reduced pRb2/p130 expression was confirmed to be an independent predictor of shorter OS when considered together with tumor stage and grading (risk ratio, 7.893; confidence interval, 1.618-38.509; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time the potential prognostic value of pRb2/130 expression evaluated on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections in STSs patients. pRb2/p130 immunoreactivity can be used to predict OS in patients with nonmetastatic STSs and, therefore, may represent a new prognostic marker.

Weekly irinotecan plus protracted venous fluorouracil infusion (WI-FI) in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI) is a topoisomerase I inhibitor active as first- or second-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). Its combination with fluorouracil (FU) increases the response rate and prolongs survival. In order to identify a new effective and less toxic schedule of administration, we planned this phase II study with weekly IRI and protracted venous infusion of FU (WI-FI regimen). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Secondary aims were to detect toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts). MATERIALS AND METHODS: On May 2000, a monoinstitutional study commenced with the following schedule of administration: IRI 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 plus a 28-day protracted venous infusion of FU 200 mg/m2/day. The treatment was repeated every 35 days. Cycles were administered until a maximum of 6 courses, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: By March 2005, 52 patients (30 males and 22 females) had entered the study. Their median age was 61.5 years and the median ECOG PS was 1. In total, 223 courses were administered (median 5 cycles/patient). Toxicity was low: neutropenia G3 and asthenia G3 were the most observed toxicities (5 pts each). No other grade 3-4 toxic side-effects were seen. Weekly IRI was interrupted in 11 pts, mostly related to problems with the central venous catheter. Following RECIST criteria, we observed 5 complete responses, 15 partial responses, 17 pts had stable disease, while in 15 disease progressed. The overall response rate was 38.5% and the disease control rate was 71.2%. Thirteen pts underwent surgical resection of their relapsing disease. The median PFS was 8.2 months and the median OS was 16.3 months. CONCLUSION: The WI-FI regimen is an active treatment with a good safety profile in patients with CRC. The low incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities justifies further evaluation of this combination.

High dose methotrexate in adult patients with osteosarcoma: clinical and pharmacokinetic results.

High dose methotrexate (HDMTX) with folinic acid rescue is widely used to treat osteosarcoma, which predominantly afflicts children; the study investigated HDMTX pharmacokinetics (pk) in adult subjects in neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings. Twenty five patients with advanced osteosarcoma (11 females--14 males, median age 26.0 years) were treated by 12 g/m2 HDMTX 4 hour iv infusion (64 total courses, range 1-7 courses). Pk was determined by non-compartmental analysis and population pk modeling. Median (range) bioavailability pk parameters were: C(max) (maximum MTX concentration) 1149.5 microM (692-2,200), AUC(tot) (total area under curve) 6,955.1 micromol*h/l (3,477-12,681). C(max)>1,000 microM gave increased histological responses (p < 0.05). Six covariates (height-weight-hemoglobin-AST-ALT-creatinine) were found to influence MTX volume of distribution (V) and elimination rate constant (K(el)). Toxicity was mild: only two reversible G4 events were observed, related to AUC(tot) >12,000 micromol*h/l (p < 0.001). HDMTX pk and interpatient variability in adults are comparable to those in children. No correlation between C(max)/AUC(tot) and subject age/sex was found, even in the population pk model. The excretion mechanism is not affected by sex/age differences. HDMTX can safely be administered to adults: as in younger patients, a good clinical response can be predicted by C(max), while severe toxicity depends on highest AUC(tot) values.