Multiregional sequencing and circulating tumour DNA analysis provide complementary approaches for comprehensive disease profiling of small lymphocytic lymphoma.

We aimed at molecularly dissecting the anatomical heterogeneity of small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), by analysing a cohort of 12 patients for whom paired DNA from a lymph node biopsy and circulating cells, as well as plasma-circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) was available. Notably, the analyses of the lymph node biopsy and of circulating cells complement each other since a fraction of mutations (20·4% and 36·4%, respectively) are unique to each compartment. Plasma ctDNA identified two additional unique mutations. Consistently, the different synchronous sources of tumour DNA complement each other in informing on driver gene mutations in SLL harbouring potential prognostic and/or predictive value.

Phenotypic Characteristics of the Tumour Microenvironment in Primary and Secondary Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

(1) Background: The intra-tumoural heterogeneity (ITH) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its microenvironment (TME) across primary and secondary disease is poorly characterised. (2) Methods: Intra-tumoural (IT) and peri-tumoural (PT) staining of matched primary and secondary samples was conducted to evaluate the distribution of CD4+/FOXP3+ and CD8+/PD1+ T-cells. Samples underwent PD-L1/2 immunostaining, tumour mutational burden (TMB) evaluation, and high-resolution T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing to derive T-cell clonality and targeted transcriptomics. (3) Results: We analysed 24 samples from matched primary (n = 11) and secondary (n = 13; 5 synchronous, 6 metachronous) deposits, 11 being extrahepatic (84.6%). IT CD8+ density was lower than PT in both primary (p = 0.005) and secondary deposits (p = 0.01), consistent with immune exclusion. PD-L1+ tumours displayed higher IT and PT CD8+/PD1+ cell density compared to PD-L1- (p < 0.05), and primary IT infiltrate was enriched in CD4+/FOXP3+ cells, compared to PT regions (p = 0.004). TCR-sequencing demonstrated enrichment of the top T-cell clonotype in secondary versus primary HCC (p = 0.02), without differences in overall productive clonality (p = 0.35). TMB was similar across primary versus secondary HCC (p = 0.95). While directed gene set analysis demonstrated the uniformity of transcriptional signatures of individual immune cell types, secondary deposits demonstrated higher COLEC12 (p = 0.004), CCL26 (p = 0.02), CD1E (p = 0.02) and CD36 (p = 0.03) expression with downregulation of CXCL1 (p = 0.03), suggesting differential regulation of innate immunity. (4) Conclusion: Immune exclusion is a defining feature of the HCC TME. Despite evidence of homogeneity in somatic TMB, secondary HCC is characterised by the expansion of a distinct T-cell clonotype and differential regulation of innate immune pathways.

Comparative analysis of programmed death ligand 1 expression in paired cytologic and histologic specimens of non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cytologic specimens from transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) or transthoracic needle aspiration are often the only cancer tissue material available for the analysis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This study was aimed at assessing the concordance of PD-L1 expression in histologic and cytologic samples and at evaluating interobserver agreement on specimens in this setting. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight specimens from 60 patients with NSCLC were analyzed. Histologic specimens were represented by endoscopic samples obtained with forceps (biopsies), whereas cytologic specimens were from TBNA and bronchial lavage (BL). PD-L1 expression was quantified with the immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based Ventana SP263 assay. For cytologic specimens, IHC was performed on cell block sections. Two independent pathologists who were blinded to the clinical data evaluated partial or complete membrane IHC staining. Concordance between 2 methods and between 2 pathologists was evaluated with normal and weighted Cohen's κ coefficients, overall agreement, and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was quantified in 138 specimens from 60 patients. Concordance between cytologic and histologic approaches was moderate (κ = 0.56; weighted κ = 0.55). Also, concordance in the biopsy-TBNA and biopsy-BL subgroups was moderate (κ = 0.43 and κ = 0.47, respectively), whereas interobserver agreement was substantial (weighted κ = 0.72). A Bland-Altman plot showed an underestimation in PD-L1 values from cytologic samples in comparison with histologic ones. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that in the absence of available histologic specimens, PD-L1 positivity in cytologic samples could be a reliable data for the oncologist to consider immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. However, a comparison of cytologic and histologic samples has shown an underestimation of PD-L1 values in cytologic samples.

Clinical implications of heterogeneity in PD-L1 immunohistochemical detection in hepatocellular carcinoma: the Blueprint-HCC study.

Programmed cell death ligand-1 immunohistochemical detection (PD-L1 IHC) is a putative predictor of response to PD-1/PD-L1-targeted checkpoint inhibitors. However, there is no gold standard assay in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated 5 PD-L1 IHC assay platforms (E1LN3, 28-8, 22c3, SP263 and SP142) in 100 HCCs reporting PD-L1 expression in malignant (M) and tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TICs) and non-tumorous cirrhotic tissues (NTICs). We found substantial inter-assay heterogeneity in detecting PD-L1 expression in M (R2 = 0.080-0.921), TICs (Cohen's κ = 0.175-0.396) and NTICs (κ = 0.004-0.505). Such diversity may impact on the reliability and reproducibility of PD-L1 IHC assays as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Expression analysis of HMGB1 in histological samples of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

AIMS: High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a chromatin structural protein, expressed ubiquitously in the nuclei of mammalian cells. When transported extracellularly, it acts as a tumour suppressor and oncogenic protein. In malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), high serum levels of HMGB1 have been related to a poor prognosis. Conversely, the significance of HMGB1 expression in MPM tissues is still unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Biopsy samples from 170 patients with MPM were assessed by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to evaluate HMGB1 protein and gene expression. The expression level of HMGB1 protein was scored using a semiquantitative system that sums the intensity (0-3) and the percentage (from 0 to 4) of positively stained cells in nuclei, cytoplasm and in both. The final score was considered as high (>3) or low (<3) expression. Gene expression levels were calculated using the ΔΔCt method. High expression levels of HMGB1 as total (P = 0.0011) and cytoplasmic score (P = 0.0462) were related to a worse disease-specific survival (DSS) in the entire cohort and in the clinicopathological subgroups. No significant correlation was found between HMGB1 gene expression and DSS. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that HMGB1 may be a useful prognostic biomarker in MPM when detected by immunohistochemistry. Conversely, as it is also expressed in normal and reactive mesothelial cells, HMGB1 cannot be considered a diagnostic biomarker in histological samples of mesothelioma.