Examining nursing processes in primary care settings using the Chronic Care Model: an umbrella review.

BACKGROUND: While there is clear evidence that nurses can play a significant role in responding to the needs of populations with chronic conditions, there is a lack of consistency between and within primary care settings in the implementation of nursing processes for chronic disease management. Previous reviews have focused either on a specific model of care, populations with a single health condition, or a specific type of nurses. Since primary care nurses are involved in a wide range of services, a comprehensive perspective of effective nursing processes across primary care settings and chronic health conditions could allow for a better understanding of how to support them in a broader way across the primary care continuum. This systematic overview aims to provide a picture of the nursing processes and their characteristics in chronic disease management as reported in empirical studies, using the Chronic Care Model (CCM) conceptual approach. METHODS: We conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews published between 2005 and 2021 based on the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool. RESULTS: Twenty-six systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, covering 394 primary studies. The methodological quality of most reviews was moderate. Self-care support processes show the most consistent positive outcomes across different conditions and primary care settings. Case management and nurse-led care show inconsistent outcomes. Most reviews report on the clinical components of the Chronic Care Model, with little mention of the decision support and clinical information systems components. CONCLUSIONS: Placing greater emphasis on decision support and clinical information systems could improve the implementation of nursing processes. While the need for an interdisciplinary approach to primary care is widely promoted, it is important that this approach not be viewed solely from a clinical perspective. The organization of care and resources need to be designed to support contributions from all providers to optimize the full range of services available to patients with chronic conditions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021220004.

Multicentre implementation of a nursing competency framework at a provincial scale: A qualitative description of facilitators and barriers.

RATIONALE: Nurses are responsible for engaging in continuing professional development throughout their careers. This implies that they use tools such as competency frameworks to assess their level of development, identify their learning needs, and plan actions to achieve their learning goals. Although multiple competency frameworks and guidelines for their development have been proposed, the literature on their implementation in clinical settings is sparser. If the complexity of practice creates a need for context-sensitive competency frameworks, their implementation may also be subject to various facilitators and barriers. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To document the facilitators and barriers to implementing a nursing competency framework on a provincial scale. METHODS: This multicentre study was part of a provincial project to implement a nursing competency framework in Quebec, Canada, using a three-step process based on evidence from implementation science. Nurses' participation consisted in the self-assessment of their competencies using the framework. For this qualitative descriptive study, 58 stakeholders from 12 organizations involved in the first wave of implementation participated in group interviews to discuss their experience with the implementation process and their perceptions of facilitators and barriers. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of the data yielded five themes: finding the 'right unit' despite an unfavourable context; taking and protecting time for self-assessment; creating value around competency assessment; bringing the project as close to the nurses as possible; making the framework accessible. CONCLUSION: This study was one of the first to document the large-scale, multi-site implementation of a nursing competency framework in clinical settings. This project represented a unique challenge because it involved two crucial changes: adopting a competency-based approach focused on educational outcomes and accountability to the public and valorizing a learning culture where nurses become active stakeholders in their continuing professional development.

Adaptation and validation of a nursing competencies framework for clinical practice on a continuum of care from childhood to adulthood: A Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Too few of nursing competencies framework exceed applicability to a given environment, are validated by a research process or used to guide continuing development of nursing competencies. OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were: 1) to adapt and validate a nursing competencies framework from the continuum of care from childhood to adulthood and 2) to explore implementation strategies. DESIGN: A collaborative approach including nurses from different practice perspectives. A modified Delphi method supported the adaptation and the validation of a nursing competencies framework. SETTING: This study was conducted in a pediatric and an adult care university hospitals in Montreal. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two nurses were recruited from both university hospitals. METHODS: A modified Delphi study was conducted. An online questionnaire, containing dichotomous and open-ended questions, was used to collect data on the nursing competencies framework and the suggested implementation strategies for its use. Consensus percentage was calculated, and thematic analysis was used to analyze nurses' comments and implementation strategies suggested. RESULTS: The nursing competencies framework (NCF), adapted and validated in this study, includes seven competencies and four development stages, from advanced beginner to clinical expert nurses. After three rounds, the nursing competencies framework describes the professional role from the continuum of care from childhood to adulthood, and proposes a self-assessment tool that promotes professional development and continuing education of nurses. Moreover, four strategies for implementing the framework in the clinical setting obtained a consensus of 70% or more. CONCLUSIONS: A nursing competencies framework was validated by a rigorous research process and adapted to diverse contexts of care. The results revealed a common vision of the nursing practice for patients and their families on the life course from childhood to adulthood. This innovative framework carries the potential to be a relevant and unique reference tool. The nursing competencies framework can provide guidance for the development of nurses' competencies in clinical setting. Additionally, it is a relevant reference that should be use for knowing the scope and the standards of the professional practice in nursing education.

Measured and perceived effects of audit and feedback on nursing performance: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: The use of audit and feedback (A&F) interventions in health care has been demonstrated to generally be effective on medical teams. However, literature suggests that the response of nurses to this type of intervention may differ from that of other types of health professionals, in relation to their roles, power, and to the configuration of nursing care activities. To our knowledge, no review has been conducted on A&F interventions with nurses. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the evidence of measured and perceived effects of A&F interventions on nurses' performance. METHODS: A mixed methods systematic review design with thematic and narrative synthesis is used. Studies reporting quantitative and qualitative data on the effects of A&F interventions specific to nursing care are considered for inclusion. Studies will be appraised for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Quantitative and qualitative data will be summarized in narrative and tabular form and will be synthetized using a segregated methodologies approach. DISCUSSION: Results will describe the characteristics of A&F with nurses, as well as the measured and perceived effects specific to nursing care. The associations between the characteristics and the effects as well as the concordance between measured and perceived effects will be presented. We anticipate that combining the evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies will allow us to provide relevant insight that can inform the design of better suited A&F interventions for nurses. Audit and feedback interventions demonstrate potential for improving the performance of nursing care. As their effectiveness varies greatly depending on the context and the professionals involved, a better understanding of the associations between its characteristics and the measured and perceived effects is valuable for improving the effectiveness of A&F. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018104973.