Impact of multidisciplinary approach and radiologic review on surgical outcome and overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team case discussion including computed tomography (CT) radiologic review on surgical outcome and overall survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Patients with PDAC evaluated in 2008-2011 and 2013-2016 (before and after multidisciplinary team introduction), aged <85 years and staged I-III, were included. Surgical failures and 2-year OS were compared in these periods. Available CT scans of preintervention period (2008-2011) cases were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus, assigning a resectability judgment to evaluate in how many cases a different recommendation would be achieved. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients (49.3% female, age 71±10 years) were included: 132 in 2008-2011 and 184 in 2013-2016. The proportion of patients who underwent upfront surgery was similar in the two periods (51% vs 47% in 2008-2011 vs 2013-2016). Neoadjuvant referral increased from 7% to 21% and surgical resection was excluded for 42% patients in 2008-2011 vs 33% in 2013-2016 (p = 0.002). Adjusting by age, sex, and stage, surgical failures slightly decreased in 2013-2016 (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.51); the decrease was stronger when therapeutic choice complied with CT indications (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.36-1.63); in both cases, the decrease could be due to chance. After correction for age, sex, and stage, the hazard ratio of 2013-2016 for OS was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.64-1.09). In 33/114 (29%) patients, CT retrospective review produced a change in resectability judgment. CONCLUSION: Although differences could be due to chance or generic improvement, the consistency between process and outcome indicators suggests that multidisciplinary team approach with radiologic review may improve outcomes.

Complications and mortality in a cohort of patients undergoing emergency and elective surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an Italian multicenter study. Teachings of Phase 1 to be brought in Phase 2 pandemic.

Since the beginning of the pandemic due to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its related disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), several articles reported negative outcomes in surgery of infected patients. Aim of this study is to report results of patients with COVID-19-positive swab, in the perioperative period after surgery. Data of COVID-19-positive patients undergoing emergent or oncological surgery, were collected in a retrospective, multicenter study, which involved 20 Italian institutions. Collected parameters were age, sex, body mass index, COVID-19-related symptoms, patients' comorbidities, surgical procedure, personal protection equipment (PPE) used in operating rooms, rate of postoperative infection among healthcare staff and complications, within 30-postoperative days. 68 patients, who underwent surgery, resulted COVID-19-positive in the perioperative period. Symptomatic patients were 63 (92.5%). Fever was the main symptom in 36 (52.9%) patients, followed by dyspnoea (26.5%) and cough (13.2%). We recorded 22 (32%) intensive care unit admissions, 23 (33.8%) postoperative pulmonary complications and 15 (22%) acute respiratory distress syndromes. As regards the ten postoperative deaths (14.7%), 6 cases were related to surgical complications. One surgeon, one scrub nurse and two circulating nurses were infected after surgery due to the lack of specific PPE. We reported less surgery-related pulmonary complications and mortality in Sars-CoV-2-infected patients, than in literature. Emergent and oncological surgery should not be postponed, but it is mandatory to use full PPE, and to adopt preoperative screenings and strategies that mitigate the detrimental effect of pulmonary complications, mostly responsible for mortality.

Primary pancreatic perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa): A surgical enigma. A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is a rare mesenchymal tumor, with distinctive morphology and expression of myo-melanocytic markers. Current scientific literature reported just 24 cases of pancreatic PEComas. With our systematic review, we aimed at improving our understanding of the disease, focusing on the knowledge gained on epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: Based on the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic research was carried out on PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and EBSCO using the search terms: ("perivascular epithelioid cell tumor" OR ″PEComa") and ("pancreas "OR″ pancreatic"). RESULTS: The 4th-6th decades of life and female sex (86.9%) turned out as the most affected. Pancreatic head was the most involved site (50%), with a single lesion in almost all cases. The diagnosis was only obtained after histopathological examination (70.8%). The clinical presentation was non-specific, abdominal pain being the main symptom (60.9%). At immunohistochemistry, PEComa showed benign epithelioid predominance and a strong positivity for HMB-45, Melan-A, and α-SMA. Surgical resection was performed in almost all cases, while for one patient the multidisciplinary group chose just endoscopic and imaging follow-up, based on the benign nature of the lesion. CONCLUSIONS: The biological characteristics of pancreatic PEComa remain an enigma. Its prognosis seems to depend on whether atypical ("worrisome") histological features are available or not. Surgery turned out as the most appropriate treatment, without reaching any agreement on surgery timing. Further studies on larger population are needed to better understand the biological features of pancreatic PEComa, in order to set up guidelines in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Transmural Colonic Infarction after Routine Colonoscopy in a Young Patient without Risk Factors.

Colonoscopy is one of the most widely used procedures in medical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of many benign and malignant diseases of the colorectal tract. Colonscopy has become the reference procedure for screening and surveillance of colorectal cancer. The overall rate of adverse events is estimated to be about 2.8 per 1,000 procedures, while complications requiring hospitalization are about 1.9 per 1,000 colonoscopies. Mortality from all causes and colonoscopy-specific mortality are estimated to be 0.07 and 0.007%, respectively. An exceptional fearsome postcolonoscopy complication is colon ischemia (CI); only few cases have been reported worldwide. We present the case of a 43-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department complaining of abdominal pain; fever and rectal bleeding appeared 12 h after a voluntary 'screening' colonoscopy. She had no risk factors for CI. Her laboratory tests showed alterations in inflammatory markers and a computed tomography scan showed a circumferential thickening in the left colon and free fluid in the abdomen. After 12 h of observation and conservative therapy, the clinical state of the patient worsened with the rising of signs of peritonitis. Laparoscopy showed that colon infarction extended from the distal third of the transverse colon to the proximal rectum. Laparotomy, resection of the pathological colon and terminal colostomy were performed. The specimen examined confirmed an extended ischemic colitis and transmural infarction on the antimesocolic side, in the absence of a vasculitis. The patient underwent recanalization after 8 months. CI after colonoscopy is a rare and alarming complication that must be known and taken into account in the differential diagnosis of symptomatic cases after colonoscopy, particularly in patients with known risk factors. The diagnosis is mainly based on clinical data, imaging and especially endoscopy. Treatment is almost always conservative but, in some cases in which the pathological process appears irreversible, surgery becomes mandatory.

Gallbladder's clear cell renal carcinoma metastasis: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is well known for its propensity to metastasize to unusual sites, even after 10 years. Gallbladder metastases are extremely rare, being found in approximately 0.6% of cases, at autopsy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man with a history of right ccRCC underwent total nephrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy, in another Hospital. Three years later, he was hospitalized at our Hospital, with gallbladder metastasis detected during a follow-up CT scan. At clinical examination, the patient did not present any symptoms or signs of gallbladder disease. Several imaging tests were performed to better characterize the lesion. A successful cholecystectomy and hepatic resection of 4b segment were performed, obtaining a R0 resection. The clinical course was uneventful, without any complications. After a 7-month follow-up, the patient is free from disease. DISCUSSION: A typical metastases are those located in a site other than thoracic, skeletal, hepatic, adrenal or encephalic tissue. Cholecystectomy with R0 resection has demonstrated to be the only factor increasing survival, mainly in isolated cases of metastasis, providing an overall 35-60% survival rate at 5 years. CONCLUSION: In the follow-up of patients with a positive history of renal cell carcinoma specially clear cell subtype, all new finding should be taken into account as possible metastases. We ought to consider US and CT-scan behavior of gallbladder metastatic disease in order to orientate our diagnosis. Surgery for metastatic gallbladder disease of renal origin seems to be a feasible therapy which is capable of increasing patients' overall survival.