Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 50(2): 399-407, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997255

RESUMO

Direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) reduce hospital length-of-stay (LOS) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in clinical trials. There is a paucity of literature describing real world utility of DOACs, particularly in intermediate-risk patients. To evaluate if the utilization of DOACs vs. non-DOACs in acute PE patients, reduces LOS without a difference in safety in patients defined as low and intermediate-risk of mortality by the European Society of Cardiology. This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from a single center registry of consecutive adult outpatients diagnosed with acute PE who survived to hospital discharge. Primary outcome was median hospital LOS. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmission, survival, and incidence of major and minor bleeding. There were 307 outpatients admitted with acute PE 88 (28.7%) low-risk, 213 (69.4%) intermediate-risk, and 6 (2.0%) high-risk. Two hundred and twenty-six (73.6%) received a DOAC. There was a statistically significant shorter median LOS in all patients treated with a DOAC (2.9 days, IQR 1.8-4.7) vs non-DOAC (4.9 days, IQR 3-8.9) (Generalized Linear Model p < 0.001). There was a shorter median LOS between intermediate-risk patients treated with a DOAC (3.6 days, IQR 2-5.8) vs non-DOAC (5, IQR 3-9). There was no difference in 30-day readmission, survival, or bleeding complications in both cohorts. There was a reduction in LOS in low and intermediate risk patients treated with a DOAC without a difference in 30-day safety and efficacy. Treating acute PE patients with DOACs including intermediate-risk patients, compared to conventional anticoagulation, may facilitate early discharge, and potentially reduce hospital costs.


Assuntos
Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Crit Care Med ; 45(12): 2040-2045, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28953498

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Risk stratification for acute pulmonary embolism using imaging presence of right ventricular dysfunction is essential for triage; however, comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography has limited availability. We assessed the accuracy and timeliness of Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellow's performance of goal-directed echocardiograms and intensivists' interpretations for evaluating right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism. DESIGN: Prospective observational study and retrospective chart review. SETTING: Four hundred fifty bed urban teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Adult in/outpatients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism. INTERVENTIONS: Pulmonary critical care fellows performed and documented their goal-directed echocardiogram as normal or abnormal for right ventricular size and function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Gold standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed on schedule unless the goal-directed echocardiogram showed critical findings. Attending intensivists blinded to the clinical scenario reviewed these exams at a later date. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients were evaluated for acute PE. Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellows performed 154 goal-directed echocardiograms, 110 with complete cardiology-reviewed transthoracic echocardiography within 48 hours for comparison. Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellow's area under the curve for size and function was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), respectively. Intensivists' 1/2 area under the curve for size and function was (1) 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.94), (1) 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and (2) 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95), (2) 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95). Median time difference between goal-directed echocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiography was 21 hours 18 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate pulmonary critical care fellows' and intensivists' use of goal-directed echocardiography in diagnosing right ventricular dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellows and intensivists made a timely and accurate assessment. Screening for right ventricular dysfunction using goal-directed echocardiography can and should be performed by pulmonary critical care physicians in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo , Disfunção Ventricular Direita/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 31(9): 1357-60, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23896011

RESUMO

Non-opioid analgesics are often administered to emergency department (ED) patients with musculoskeletal pain but if inadequate, opioids are given with associated potential adverse events. We tested the hypothesis that the reduction in pain scores with the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen would be at least 15 mm greater than with either of the agents alone. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of adult ED patients with acute musculoskeletal pain. Patients were randomized to oral ibuprofen 800 mg, acetaminophen 1 g, or their combination. Pain scores across the groups were compared with repeated measures analysis of variance at 20, 40, and 60 minutes. A sample of 30 patients in each group had 80% power to detect a 15 mm difference in pain scores across the groups (α = .05). Thirty patients were randomized to each study group. Mean (SD) age was 36 (15), 54% were male, 73% were white, and 13% were Hispanic. Groups were well balanced in baseline characteristics including initial pain scores (59, 61, and 62 for ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and their combination). Pain decreased over the one hour study period for all groups (P < .001) with mean (SD) scores about 20 mm lower on the Visual Analogue Scale than the mean initial score. However, there was no significant difference among treatments (P = .59). The need for rescue analgesics was similar across groups. We conclude that the combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen did not reduce pain scores or the need for rescue analgesics compared with either agent alone in ED patients with pain secondary to acute musculoskeletal injuries.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Dor Musculoesquelética/tratamento farmacológico , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA