Extracorporeal Blood Purification with CytoSorb in 359 Critically Ill Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients with inflammatory dysregulation and organ disfunction may benefit from blood purification, although the use of this technique has not been described in large case series. We evaluated clinical outcomes and survival in high-risk intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent extracorporeal blood purification. METHODS: 359 consecutive ICU patients treated with CytoSorb were included. RESULTS: Main admission diagnoses were 120 (34%) refractory cardiac arrest under mechanical chest compression; 101 (28%) profound cardiogenic shock; 81 (23%) post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock; and 37 (10%) respiratory failure. Fifteen patients (4%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We observed 49% 30-day mortality, 57% ICU mortality, and 62% hospital mortality, all lower than the 71% mortality predicted by SAPS II and 68% predicted by SOFA score. Parameters of shock and organ failure, above all vasoactive inotropic score, reduced during CytoSorb treatment. Multivariable analysis identified SAPS II, lactate dehydrogenase, ICU stay duration, vasoactive inotropic score, lactates, intra-aortic counterpulsation on top of VA-ECMO, and total bilirubin as predictors of mortality. No CytoSorb-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: CytoSorb treatment was effective in reducing laboratory parameters of shock and vasoactive inotropic score with possible survival implications in a large population of critically ill patients.

CytoSorb purification in critically ill SARS-CoV-2 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience with CytoSorb treatment in patients with refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Retrospective observational study on 15 patients treated in a University Hospital. RESULTS: All patients were male, with a mean age of 55 ± 14 years; eight patients (53%) were on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) due to refractory ARDS and all (100%) under mechanical ventilation at the time of CytoSorb use. We observed reduction in the level of C reactive protein (-52%, p = 0.002), total bilirubin (-46%, p = 0.03), direct bilirubin (-50%, p = 0.02), and D-dimers (-39%, p = 0.04) during CytoSorb treatment and a trend toward reduction in lactate dehydrogenase (-20%, p = 0.2), creatine phosphokinase (-38%, p = 0.1), and fibrinogen (-15%, p = 0.07). Eight patients died (53%) and seven (47%) were discharged from the ICU, of which five had recovery of the native lung function and two were successfully bridged to lung transplantation on VV ECMO support. No difference between survivors and non-survivors was present at baseline. Patients received three CytoSorb cycles on average: mean duration of CytoSorb cycle was 17 h 21 min, but premature circuit clotting despite appropriate level of systemic anticoagulation was frequently observed. CONCLUSIONS: CytoSorb treatment was effective in improving several laboratory parameters and inflammation in our experience and no treatment-related adverse effects were recorded. In the light of the unique pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, CytoSorb treatment is extremely promising, since it might both reduce inflammation and activation of coagulation.