A Laboratory Medicine Perspective on the Investigation of Phaeochromocytoma and Paraganglioma.

Phaeochromocytomas (PC) and sympathetic paragangliomas (PGL) are potentially malignant tumours arising from the adrenal medulla (PC) or elsewhere in the sympathetic nervous system (PGL). These tumours usually secrete catecholamines and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, so accurate and timely diagnosis is essential. The initial diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) is often dependent on biochemical testing. There is a range of pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors influencing the analytical and diagnostic performance of biochemical tests for PPGL. Pre-analytical factors include patient preparation, sample handling and choice of test. Analytical factors include choice of methodology and the potential for analytical interference from medications and other compounds. Important factors in the post-analytical phase include provision of appropriate reference ranges, an understanding of the potential effects of various medications on metanephrine concentrations in urine and plasma and a consideration of PPGL prevalence in the patient population being tested. This article reviews these pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical factors that must be understood in order to provide effective laboratory services for biochemical testing in the diagnosis of PPGL.

The clinical and laboratory investigation of dysbetalipoproteinemia.

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (type III hyperlipoproteinemia) is a potentially underdiagnosed inherited dyslipidemia associated with greatly increased risk of coronary and peripheral vascular disease. The mixed hyperlipidemia observed in this disorder usually responds well to appropriate medical therapy and lifestyle modification. Although there are characteristic clinical features such as palmar and tuberous xanthomata, associated with dysbetalipoproteinemia, they are not always present, and their absence cannot be used to exclude the disorder. The routine lipid profile cannot distinguish dysbetalipoproteinemia from other causes of mixed hyperlipidemia and so additional investigations are required for confident diagnosis or exclusion. A range of investigations that have been proposed as potential diagnostic tests are discussed in this review, but the definitive biochemical test for dysbetalipoproteinemia is widely considered to be beta quantification. Beta quantification can determine the presence of "ß-VLDL" in the supernatant following ultracentrifugation and whether the VLDL cholesterol to triglyceride ratio is elevated. Both features are considered hallmarks of the disease. However, beta quantification and other specialist tests are not widely available and are not high-throughput tests that can practically be applied to all patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Using apolipoprotein B (as a ratio either to total or non-HDL cholesterol or as part of a multi-step algorithm) as an initial test to select patients for further investigation is a promising approach. Several studies have demonstrated a high degree of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity using these approaches and apolipoprotein B is a relatively low-cost test that is widely available on high-throughput platforms. Genetic testing is also important in the diagnosis, but it should be noted that most individuals with an E2/2 genotype do not suffer from remnant hyperlipidemia and around 10% of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia cases are caused by rarer, autosomal dominant mutations in APOE that will only be detected if the gene is fully sequenced. Wider implementation of diagnostic pathways utilizing apo B could lead to more rational use of specialist investigations and more consistent detection of patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia. Without the application of a consistent evidence-based approach to identifying dysbetalipoproteinemia, many cases are likely to remain undiagnosed.

Evaluation of the Non-HDL Cholesterol to Apolipoprotein B Ratio as a Screening Test for Dysbetalipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is associated with the accumulation of remnant lipoproteins and premature cardiovascular disease. Identification of dysbetalipoproteinemia is important because family members may be affected. Diagnostic testing involves demonstration of ß-lipoprotein in the VLDL fraction or characterization of apo E3. These investigations are complex and relatively expensive. The ratios of apo B to total cholesterol and triglycerides have been proposed as screening tests. However, the ratio of non-HDL cholesterol to apo B (NHDLC/apoB) could offer improved performance as the confounding effect of variations in HDL cholesterol is removed. METHODS: We evaluated NHDLC/apoB as a screening test for dysbetalipoproteinemia, using ß-quantification analysis as a reference standard. Data from 1637 patients referred over a 16-year period for ß quantification were reviewed retrospectively. In 63 patients, diagnostic criteria for dysbetalipoproteinemia (VLDL cholesterol/triglyceride ratio ≥0.69 and presence of ß-VLDL) were fulfilled, and 1574 patients had dysbetalipoproteinemia excluded. RESULTS: Mean NHDLC/apoB in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia was 7.3 mmol/g (SD, 1.5 mmol/g) and with dysbetalipoproteinemia excluded was 4.0 mmol/g (SD, 0.5 mmol/g). The optimum cutoff of >4.91 mmol/g achieved a diagnostic sensitivity of 96.8% (95% CI, 89.0-99.6) and specificity of 95.0% (95% CI, 93.8-96.0). NHDLC/apoB offered improved performance compared to total cholesterol/apoB [diagnostic sensitivity 92.1% (95% CI, 82.4-97.4) and specificity 94.5% (95% CI, 93.2-95.6) with a cutoff of >6.55 mmol/g]. NHDL/apoB reference ranges were not sex-dependent, although there was a significant difference between men and women for total cholesterol/apoB. CONCLUSIONS: NHDLC/apoB offers a simple first-line test for dysbetalipoproteinemia in selecting patients with mixed hyperlipidemia for more complex investigations.