Is ultrasonography accurate for the diagnosis of gallbladder polyps? A review of cholecystectomy specimens from patients diagnosed with gallbladder polyps over a 14-years period.

INTRODUCTION: Incidence of gallbladder polyps is 0,3-12%. It is important to differentiate pseudopolyps (cholesterol polyps, adenomyomatosis, inflammatory polyps), which do not have the capacity to become malignant, from true polyps (adenomas and adenocarcinomas). The main risk factors for malignancy are >6-10 mm, growth, sessile morphology, Indian ethnicity and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Ultrasound is the gold standard for diagnosis. Most polyps diagnosed by ultrasound are pseudopolyps. The main objective of this study is to analyse whether ultrasound is accurate for diagnosing true polyps in patients undergoing surgery for this reason. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with prospective data entry of patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyps from 2007 to 2021. Surgery was indicated in symptomatic patients and in those with risk factors. The study has been approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of our hospital. RESULTS: We included 124 patients in our study. An elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in all of them. The mean age was 55,4 years and 61% were women. Of all patients, 65% were symptomatic at diagnosis. Only 3 patients had true polyps (2,4%). All of them were tubular adenomas. The rest of patients were false positives (97,6%). The adenoma size was 11, 6 and 5 mm, respectively. The surgical indication was due to polyp size or due to associated biliary symptoms. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography is not accurate for the diagnosis of gallbladder polyps. Validation of other complementary tests for the diagnosis of gallbladder polyps in asymptomatic patients could be relevant to avoid unnecessary surgeries.

Pancreatic non-functioning neuroendocrine tumor: a new entity genetically related to Lynch syndrome.

Some pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) are associated with hereditary syndromes. An association between Lynch syndrome (LS) and P-NETs has been suggested, however it has not been confirmed to date. We describe the first case associating LS and P-NETs. Here we report a 65-year-old woman who in the past 20 years presented two colorectal carcinomas (CRC) endometrial carcinoma (EC), infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma, small intestine adenocarcinoma, two non-functioning P-NETs and sebomatricoma. With the exception of one P-NET, all these conditions were associated with LS, as confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). LS is caused by a mutation of a mismatch repair (MMR) gene which leads to a loss of expression of its protein. CRC is the most common tumor, followed by EC. Pancreatic tumors have also been associated with LS. Diagnosis of LS is based on clinical criteria (Amsterdam II and Bethesda) and genetic study (MMR gene mutation). The association between LS and our patient's tumors was confirmed by IHC (loss of expression of proteins MLH1 and its dimer PMS2) and the detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) using PCR.

Organ-preserving surgery for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head: a matched case-control study.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative results of various preservative surgery (PS) techniques with those of two types of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: The subjects of this study were 65 patients treated surgically for chronic pancreatitis, or benign or borderline tumors. We defined PS as any of the following: duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR), uncinatectomy (UC), and cystic tumor enucleation (EN). The two types of PD were Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (WPD) and pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD). RESULTS: Benign lesions were treated with PD in 41 patients and PS in 24 patients. Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 17 patients, PPPD in 24, DPPHR in 20, EN in 3, and UC in 1. The main indication for surgery was chronic pancreatitis (66%). Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was seen in 41% of patients in the PD group but none in the PS group (P = 0.04). However, there were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of pancreatic fistulas or other complications. Reoperation was required in five of the PD patients, but none of the PS patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical techniques for preserving pancreatic tissue are effective for carefully selected patients with benign pancreatic disorders.

[Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Diagnostic and therapeutic management]. / Neoplasias quísticas del páncreas. Manejo diagnóstico y terapéutico.

Management of the cystic lesions of the pancreas is of interest to general and pancreatic surgeons and physicians of other disciplines: gastroenterology, internal medicine, endoscopy, radiology, pathology, etc. The majority of cystic lesions are inflammatory pseudo-cysts. Cystic neoplasms represents only 10% of cystic lesions of the pancreas and 1% of pancreatic tumours. Preoperative diagnosis is crucial given the differences in natural history of the spectrum of benign, malignant, and borderline lesions. Serous cystadenoma is a benign lesion that requires non-surgical management if there are no symptoms. Mucinous neoplasms are premalignant lesions that mainly require pancreatic resection. Despite improved radiographic imaging techniques, definitive diagnosis is only made after studying the resection sample. The pancreatic surgical risk is a problem for the appropriate management of these patients.

[Indications and results of pancreatic surgery preserving the duodenopancreatic region]. / Indicaciones y resultados de la cirugía conservadora en las lesiones localizadas en la cabeza pancreática.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery that preserves the duodenopancreatic region has become well-established in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and some groups have begun to use these techniques to treat benign tumors and even those with uncertain potential malignancy. However, the technical complexity of this type of intervention may be greater than that of cephalic duodenopancreatectomy and complications may be even more frequent and consequently the indications for these procedures are debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the experience accumulated at our center over the past few years in the use of pancreatic surgery preserving the duodenopancreatic region (PS). MATERIAL AND METHODS. Between 1996 and 2006, we carried out PS in 24 patients with disease localized in the head of the pancreas. PS was defined as any of the following techniques: resection of the head of the pancreas with duodenal preservation (RHPDP), uncinatectomy (UC) and cystic tumor enucleation (EN). RESULTS: RHPDP was performed in 20 patients (83%), UC in 1 (4%) and EN in 3 (13%). Surgery was performed for CP in 11 patients, serous cystoadenoma in 4, intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in 5 and miscellaneous injuries in the four remaining patients. Overall, the series showed 54% morbidity with no post-operative mortality. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (7-43). CONCLUSION: After analyzing the experience accumulated over the years, showing nil mortality and acceptable morbidity, we believe that the use of these 3 techniques for preserving the pancreatic parenchyma is useful when their suitability is rigorously indicated. Subsequent studies should look in depth at improving quality of life and physiological effects, depending on the technique used.

Emergency operations for nondiverticular perforation of the left colon.

OBJECTIVE: Although diverticulitis is the most common cause of large bowel perforation, other disease may result in left colonic peritonitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the incidence, management, and outcome of patients with different causes of nondiverticular left colonic perforations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1992 to September 2000, 212 surgical patients underwent emergency operation for distal colonic peritonitis. Perforations were caused by diverticulitis in 133 patients (63%) and by a nondiverticular process in 79 (37%). Mortality and morbidity in patients with nondiverticular perforation of the distal large bowel its relationship with the general conditions, the grade and the cause of peritonitis were analysed. Four types of surgical procedures were used. Hartmann's procedure was performed in 40 patients (51%); intraoperative colonic lavage, resection, and primary anastomosis (ICL) in 27 patients (34%); colostomy in 7 (9%); and subtotal colectomy in 5 (6%). RESULTS: Perforated neoplasm, the most common cause of peritonitis, was observed in 30 patients, colonic ischemia in 20, iatrogenia in 13, and other causes in 16 patients. One or more complications were observed in 57 patients (72%); among causes of perforation, colonic ischemia was significantly associated with the longest hospital stay and highest mortality. Eighteen patients (23%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Left large bowel perforation by nondiverticular disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The prognosis of patients is determined by the development of septic shock and colonic ischemia, as underlying disease, may influence patient survival.