Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PeerJ ; 11: e16310, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37901455

RESUMO

We collected oral and/or rectal swabs and serum from dogs and cats living in homes with SARS-CoV-2-PCR-positive persons for SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing. Pre-COVID-19 serum samples from dogs and cats were used as negative controls, and samples were tested in duplicate at different timepoints. Raw ELISA results scrutinized relative to known negative samples suggested that cut-offs for IgG seropositivity may require adjustment relative to previously proposed values, while proposed cut-offs for IgM require more extensive validation. A small number of pet dogs (2/43, 4.7%) and one cat (1/21, 4.8%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and 28.6 and 37.5% of cats and dogs were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, respectively.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças do Gato , Doenças do Cão , Animais , Gatos , Cães , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Animais de Estimação , North Carolina/epidemiologia , RNA Viral/genética , Doenças do Cão/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina G
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA