Donor complications of contralateral C7 nerve transfer in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Contralateral C7 (CC7) nerve transfer is a reconstructive option in the upper limb when there are limited donor options. Promising results have been reported in the adult population but its role in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury (BPBI) is unclear. A major concern with this technique is the potential impact on the contralateral, unaffected limb. Our aim was to review the available literature on the use of this transfer in BPBI, to determine the incidence of short- and long-term deficits at the donor site. METHODS: The relevant literature was identified from searches of Embase, Ovid Emcare and Ovid MEDLINE, for combinations of terms relating to CC7 nerve transfer and BPBI. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included in this review, from the eight papers that were eligible for inclusion, from a total of 16 papers identified. Patient age ranged from three to 93 months and the shortest follow-up period was six months. Post-operative motor deficits at the donor site included reduced range of shoulder abduction; triceps weakness; and phrenic nerve palsy. All motor deficits recovered within six months. The only sensory deficit reported was reduced sensation in the median nerve distribution which, in all cases, resolved within four weeks. Finally, synchronous donor limb motion and sensation were reported in 46.6% of patients. CONCLUSION: CC7 nerve transfer in BPBI appears to have few long-term donor limb complications. Sensory and motor deficits are reportedly transient. The impact of synchronous motion and sensation on upper limb function in this patient cohort is not yet known.

Pharmacologic rescue of motor and sensory function by the neuroprotective compound P7C3 following neonatal nerve injury.

Nerve injuries cause pain, paralysis and numbness that can lead to major disability, and newborns often sustain nerve injuries during delivery that result in lifelong impairment. Without a pharmacologic agent to enhance functional recovery from these injuries, clinicians rely solely on surgery and rehabilitation to treat patients. Unfortunately, patient outcomes remain poor despite application of the most advanced microsurgical and rehabilitative techniques. We hypothesized that the detrimental effects of traumatic neonatal nerve injury could be mitigated with pharmacologic neuroprotection, and tested whether the novel neuroprotective agent P7C3 would block peripheral neuron cell death and enhance functional recovery in a rat neonatal nerve injury model. Administration of P7C3 after sciatic nerve crush injury doubled motor and sensory neuron survival, and also promoted axon regeneration in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with P7C3 also enhanced behavioral and muscle functional recovery, and reversed pathological mobilization of spinal microglia after injury. Our findings suggest that the P7C3 family of neuroprotective compounds may provide a basis for the development of a new neuroprotective drug to enhance recovery following peripheral nerve injury.

CT angiography-guided single-stage release of adjacent webspaces in non-Apert syndactyly.

UNLABELLED: We describe the CT angiography protocol and surgical technique utilized at our institution for single-stage release of adjacent web-spaces in non-Apert syndactyly. In a series of seven consecutive hands we analyse syndactyly anatomy, CT angiographic findings, operative details, and complications. Outcomes were assessed with a functional activity evaluation, range of motion, and a parental visual analogue scale. Seven affected hands in four patients underwent single-stage release of adjacent webspaces. In all cases, the CT angiogram correctly predicted the presence of at least one artery supplying each digit. There were no cases of digital ischemia or loss. Angiographically guided, single-stage release of adjacent webspaces is technically feasible and benefits patients by reducing the number of surgical stages and allowing complete release to be achieved at an earlier age compared with the standard multi-stage approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.