Monitoring of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity and expression during the early period of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in de novo renal transplant patients.

Measurement of inosine-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity or gene expression was used as a further approach in pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD)-guided mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy. Forty-four de novo kidney transplant patients were enrolled; 35 of these completed the study, and were followed for 24 weeks for clinical status, PK parameters, IMPDH activity and IMPDH1/2 gene expression. IMPDH activity and expression were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells before transplant and at week 2,4,12 and 24, drawn before (t0) and 2 h (t2 h) after MMF administration. No significant correlation was found between IMPDH activity/expression and PK parameters. For both genes, significant enhancement in t2 h expression was observed, then decreases towards week 24 with a trend following steroid dosages. Seven patients experienced acute rejection (AR) and exhibited significantly higher pre-transplant expression of both IMPDH1 (median 3.42 vs. 0.84; p=0.0025), and IMPDH2 genes (135 vs. 104; p=0.0218) with respect to non-rejecting patients. A significant association was also found between pre-transplant IMPDH1 mRNA and haematological complications (p=0.032). This study suggests that high steroid dosages may influence IMPDH1/2 expression, hampering their use as a PD biomarker, particularly during the early post-transplant period. The measurement of pre-transplant levels of IMPDH1/2 may contribute to prediction of individual drug responsiveness to improve the clinical management of patients in MMF therapy.

[Better before than after?]. / Prima è meglio di dopo?

Kidney transplantation before dialysis, or preemptive transplantation, is an optimal therapeutic strategy for end-stage renal disease and offers clinical advantages compared to post-dialysis transplant. Graft and patient survival rates have been shown to be comparable or even better for preemptive transplantation in different studies, avoiding the morbidities and cost of dialysis treatment. Nevertheless, it is not a realistic opportunity for the majority of patients and in our country it is performed only in living-donor, pediatric or combined kidney-pancreas transplantation. Right now, the length of the waiting list and the waiting times for cadaver donor kidneys are the most serious issues and call for ethical reflections. In transplantation, the individual medical advantage and social benefit should always converge.

Incidence of second primary cancer in transplanted patients.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplanted patients have a three- to fourfold higher lifetime risk of developing a cancer than the general population. However, the incidence of a second primary cancer in transplanted patients has never been studied, despite the fact that the presence of regular follow-ups and the increased survival of these patients make them a very attractive model. METHODS: We investigated the incidence of a second primary cancer (SPC) in 7,636 patients who underwent a kidney, liver, lung or heart transplant between 1970 and 2004, and were followed-up for 51,819 person-years. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 499 subjects developed a first cancer (annual incidence: 98.6 x 10,000 PY), and 22 of them developed a SPC (annual incidence: 3.9 x 10,000 PY). The annual incidence of a SPC in the transplanted patients who developed a first cancer was 107.8 x 10,000 PY, giving a standardized incidence ratio of 1.1 (95% CI: 0.83-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: This result shows that the incidence of the SPC was the same as the incidence of a first cancer. Our study does not indicate an increased risk of SPC in transplanted subjects who already suffered a first malignancy.

Kidney transplantation from anti-HBc+ donors: results from a retrospective Italian study.

BACKGROUND: The risk of transmitting a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from donor kidneys with a past HBV serological profile may be negligible. Data on HBV transmission to kidney transplant recipients from donor organs that were anti-HBc/HBsAg in Italy has not been previously reported. Anti-HBc testing in cadaver organ donors has been mandatory in Italy since 2002, when anti-HBc determinations were included in the National Guidelines for donor evaluation. Therefore, prior to that date kidney recipients from anti-HBc/HBsAg donors can be identified retrospectively where stored serum is available for testing. METHODS: The prevalence of anti-HBc Italian organ donors, the incidence of HBV transmission according to the recipients' HBV status (vaccinated, recovered, or naive), and the clinical impact (5-year graft and patient survival rates) in the North Italy Transplant program was evaluated by retrospectively screening for anti-HBc antibodies in the sera of cadaver kidney donors used in transplants from 1997 to 1999. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten donors were found to have been anti-HBc. At the time of the study, no active infection was observed in any of the 344 HBsAg recipients, but 4/140 (2.86%) of the vaccinated recipients were found to have been anti-HBc/HBsAg. None of these patients, however, had any biochemical or clinical history of HBV infection. Patient and graft survival rates of anti-HBc or anti-HBc kidney recipients did not differ statistically. CONCLUSION: Kidney grafts from anti-HBc donors should be considered in all recipients because the benefit obtained from the transplantation out weighs the negligible risk of HBV transmission.

C0 or C2 driven cyclosporine monitoring in long-term pediatric kidney transplant recipients: is there any threat for chronic rejection development?

The clinical management of cyclosporine has evolved greatly during the last decade thanks to the use of pharmacokinetic (PK) studies which confirmed the dose relationship between drug exposure and its biological effects. Therefore, cyclosporine PK monitoring during the early phase of the post-transplant period became essential to avoid over or underexposure to the drug thus preventing the risk of nephrotoxicity or acute rejection episodes. More recently, a simple PK determination based on cyclosporine blood concentration measured 2 h after the morning dose, has proven to be very effective for monitoring cyclosporine exposure in the early postoperative period. In this paper, the authors present a set of PK profiles obtained from a stable, long-term pediatric kidney transplant population and correlate these parameters with the risk of chronic rejection development. The study shows how cyclosporine monitoring based on the sole trough level determination misled a correct therapeutic behavior, as revealed by the PK parameters that were constantly below the therapeutic threshold in a small patient cohort who eventually developed chronic rejection. The C2 determination should be considered as the gold standard for cyclosporine monitoring in long-term pediatric recipients.

Renal transplantation. Strategies to prevent organ rejection--the role of an inter-regional reference center.

This paper summarizes the role of the Inter-Regional Reference Center (RC) of the North Italy Transplant program (NITp), in coordinating a donor procurement and organ transplantation network, with a special focus on the strategies to minimize immunological risk and complications after transplantation. In the NITp, patients enrolled on the renal transplantation (RT) waiting list are typed for HLA-A,B,DRB1 antigens with a genomic method. They are periodically screened for the presence of lymphocytotoxic antibodies in their serum by the RC and their suitability to receive the transplant is checked periodically. Cadaver kidney allocation is ruled by a computerized algorithm, named NITK3, established in 1997, which aims at ensuring quality, equity, transparency and traceability during all the phases of the allocation decision-making process. NITK3 has been set up by the NITp Working Group on the basis of biological, medical and administrative criteria and it is periodically reviewed after the analysis of transplant results. In this paper, we show the results of a preliminary analysis of RTs performed from 1998 to 2002 in nine out of sixteen centers of the NITp area, which demonstrates the general quality of the NITp program in terms of patients and graft survival and the special attention to the patients at higher immunological risk.

A comparative prospective study of two available solutions for kidney and liver preservation.

BACKGROUND: Viaspan (University of Wisconsin [UW]) solution is the gold standard for abdominal organ preservation. Celsior (CEL) is an extracellular-type, low-potassium, low-viscosity solution, initially used for heart and lung preservation. We have performed a prospective multicenter study to compare the role of these cold-storage solutions on kidney and liver recovery after transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 15, 2000 to December 31, 2001, 441 (172 CEL and 269 UW) renal transplants (RT) and 175 (79 CEL and 96 UW) liver transplants (LT) were included in the study. RESULTS: Perfusate volume used was significantly lower in the UW group, being 4,732 +/- 796 mL versus 5,826 + 834 mL in the CEL group (P < 0.001). In LT, median total bilirubin serum levels were significantly higher at 5 and 7 posttransplant days in the UW group (90.6 and 92.3 micromol/L, respectively) as compared with CEL (51.3 and 63.4 micromol/L, respectively). After LT, primary nonfunction (PNF) rates in the CEL and UW groups were 3.8% and 4.2% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 83.3% versus 85.4% (P = NS) and 89.9% versus 90.6% (P = NS). After RT, delayed graft function (DGF) rates were 23.2% and 22.7% (P = NS), respectively; PNF rates were 1.9% and 1.7% (P = NS) respectively, with 1-year graft and patient survival being 92.3% versus 94.2% (P = NS) and 99.4% versus 97.7% (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CEL solution was shown to be as effective as UW in both liver and kidney preservation. In LT patients, biliary function recovery is significantly better in the CEL group. CEL solution represents an efficacious option in multiorgan harvesting.