Icenticaftor, a CFTR Potentiator, in COPD: A Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Rationale: CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) dysfunction is associated with mucus accumulation and worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms. Objectives: The aim of this phase IIb dose-finding study was to compare a CFTR potentiator, icenticaftor (QBW251), with placebo in patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis. Methods: Patients with COPD on triple therapy for at least three months were randomized to six treatment arms (icenticaftor 450, 300, 150, 75, or 25 mg or placebo twice daily [b.i.d.]) in a 24-week, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in trough FEV1 and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS) total and cough and sputum scores after 24 weeks. Multiple comparison procedure-modeling was conducted to characterize dose-response relationship. Rescue medication use, exacerbations, and change in serum fibrinogen concentration after 24 weeks were assessed in exploratory and post hoc analyses, respectively. Measurements and Main Results: Nine hundred seventy-four patients were randomized. After 12 weeks of icenticaftor treatment, no dose-response relationship for change from baseline in trough FEV1 was observed; however, it was observed for E-RS cough and sputum score. A dose-response relationship was observed after 24 weeks for trough FEV1, E-RS cough and sputum and total scores, rescue medication use, and fibrinogen. A dose of 300 mg b.i.d. was consistently the most effective. Improvements for 300 mg b.i.d. versus placebo were also seen in pairwise comparisons of these endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: The primary endpoint was negative, as icenticaftor did not improve trough FEV1 over 12 weeks. Although the findings must be interpreted with caution, icenticaftor improved trough FEV1; reduced cough, sputum, and rescue medication use; and lowered fibrinogen concentrations at 24 weeks. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04072887).

Ligelizumab impairs IgE-binding to plasmacytoid dendritic cells more potently than omalizumab and restores IFN-α production and FOXP3+ Treg generation.

BACKGROUND: Ligelizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody binding IgE with higher affinity than omalizumab that is under clinical investigation for several IgE-mediated diseases. We previously showed that omalizumab removes IgE bound to FcεRI on plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and restores their ability to produce IFN-α and regulatory T cells (Tregs). The aim of this work is to investigate the capacity of ligelizumab to regulate functional properties of pDCs in comparison with omalizumab. METHODS: pDCs were isolated from atopic donors and IgE was detached from FcεRI on pDCs with designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) bi53-79. pDCs were resensitized with IgE alone or in the presence of ligelizumab or omalizumab prior to IgE-FcεRI crosslinking and Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) stimulation. Flow cytometry, ELISA, coculture experiments and intranuclear staining were performed to determine cytokine production and Treg generation. An antigen-specific model of resensitization and IgE-crosslinking was also performed. RESULTS: The levels of serum total free IgE show a non-linear positive correlation with the frequency of IgE+ pDCs displaying IgE bound to FcεRI within the 43 individual donors included in the study. Ligelizumab displays stronger capacity than omalizumab to block the binding of free IgE to FcεRI on human pDCs, resulting in a greater restoration of TLR9-L-induced IFN-α production. Ligelizumab also restores the ability of pDCs to generate FOXP3+ Tregs as previously reported for omalizumab. CONCLUSIONS: The uncovered novel molecular mechanisms of ligelizumab to regulate functional properties of pDCs from atopic donors might have important clinical implications for anti-IgE treatments in different IgE-mediated diseases.

The rationale for development of ligelizumab in food allergy.

Food allergy (FA) is a growing healthcare problem worldwide and the rising prevalence in many countries can be attributed to lifestyle, environmental, and nutritional changes. Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated FA is the most common form of FA affecting approximately 3%-10% of adults and 8% of children across the globe. Food allergen-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions mediated by IgE and high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI) complexes on mast cells and basophils are a major hallmark of the disease. FA can affect several aspects of health-related quality of life and impose a substantial financial burden on patients and healthcare systems. Although currently there is one United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved treatment for peanut allergy (Palforzia), the main treatment approaches are based on allergen avoidance and symptom management. Thus, there is an urgent need for more effective and ideally disease-modifying strategies. Given the crucial role of IgE in FA, anti-IgE monoclonal antibodies are considered promising therapeutic agents. Talizumab was the first humanized anti-IgE antibody to demonstrate substantial protection against allergic reactions from accidental peanut exposure by substantially increasing the peanut reactivity threshold on oral food challenge. However, development of talizumab was discontinued and further trials were performed using omalizumab. In double-blind, Phase 2, placebo-controlled trials in patients with multi-FAs, sustained dosing with omalizumab, or omalizumab in combination with oral immunotherapy, enabled rapid desensitization to multiple trigger foods. In this review, we describe the development of ligelizumab (a derivative of talizumab), a next generation, humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, its existing clinical evidence, and its potential in the management of FA. When compared with omalizumab, ligelizumab binds with ∼88-fold higher affinity for human IgE and recognizes a different epitope that substantially overlaps with the binding site of FcεRI. These properties translate into a high potency to block IgE/FcεRI signaling in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Given its efficient suppression of IgE levels, good safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, ligelizumab clearly warrants further studies for the potential management of FA.

Ligelizumab treatment for severe asthma: learnings from the clinical development programme.

OBJECTIVE: Ligelizumab is a humanised IgG1 anti-IgE antibody that binds IgE with higher affinity than omalizumab. Ligelizumab had greater efficacy than omalizumab on inhaled and skin allergen provocation responses in mild allergic asthma. This multi-centre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to test ligelizumab in severe asthma patients not adequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticoids plus long-acting ß2-agonist. METHODS: Patients received 16 weeks ligelizumab (240 mg q2w), omalizumab or placebo subcutaneously, and ACQ-7 was measured as primary outcome at Week 16. In addition, the study generated dose-ranging data of ligelizumab and safety data. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients, age 47.4 ± 13.36 years, were included in the study. Treatment with ligelizumab did not significantly improve asthma control (ACQ-7) and exacerbation rates compared to omalizumab and placebo. Therefore, primary and secondary objectives of the study were not met. The compound was well tolerated, and the safety profile showed no new safety findings. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrated faster clearance and lower serum concentrations of ligelizumab than historical omalizumab data, and exploratory in vitro data showed differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds. CONCLUSION: Ligelizumab failed to demonstrate superiority over placebo or omalizumab. Although ligelizumab is more potent than omalizumab at inhibiting IgE binding to the high-affinity FcεRI, there is differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds. Therefore, the data suggest that different anti-IgE antibodies might be selectively efficacious for different IgE-mediated diseases.

Safety and efficacy of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator potentiator icenticaftor (QBW251).

BACKGROUND: This is the first-in-human study of icenticaftor, an oral potentiator of the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) channel. Restoration of CFTR activity has shown significant clinical benefits, but more studies are needed to address all CFTR mutations. METHODS: Safety, pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics of icenticaftor were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Efficacy was assessed in adult CF patients with ≥1 pre-specified CFTR Class III or IV mutation (150 and 450 mg bid), or homozygous for F508del mutation (450 mg bid). Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in lung clearance index (LCI2.5). Secondary endpoints included %predicted FEV1 and sweat chloride level. RESULTS: Class IV mutations were present in 22 patients, Class III in 2 (both S549N), and 25 were homozygous for F508del. Icenticaftor was well-tolerated in healthy and CF subjects with no unexpected events or discontinuations in the CF groups. The most frequent study-drug related adverse events in CF patients were nausea (12.2%), headache (10.2%), and fatigue (6.1%). Icenticaftor 450 mg bid for 14 days showed significant improvements in all endpoints versus placebo in patients with Class III and IV mutations; mean %predicted FEV1 increased by 6.46%, LCI2.5 decreased by 1.13 points and sweat chloride decreased by 8.36 mmol/L. No significant efficacy was observed in patients homozygous for a single F508del. CONCLUSIONS: Icenticaftor was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers and CF patients, and demonstrated clinically meaningful changes in lung function and sweat chloride level in CF patients with Class III and IV CFTR mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02190604.

Tegaserod in patients with mechanical sensitivity and overlapping symptoms of functional heartburn and functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: While functional heartburn (FH) and functional dyspepsia (FD) are recognized clinical entities, symptoms often overlap across both disorders. Despite their frequency, little is known of the underlying pathophysiology of overlapping symptoms. This study evaluated the effect of the 5-HT(4) agonist, tegaserod, on visceral sensitivity and symptom improvement in patients with overlapping symptoms of FH and FD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with overlapping symptoms of FH and FD (ROME II) and mechanical hypersensitivity (Barostat examination) were randomized to tegaserod 6 mg bid or placebo for 2 weeks with treatment crossover after a 2-week washout period. Esophageal and gastric Barostat sensory tests were performed and patients rated their overall symptoms at study end. When carry-over was detected, data were presented for period 1 only. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were screened of whom 30 were randomized and 25 completed. Mechanical hypersensitivity was reported by 83% of 47 patients completing esophageal and gastric baseline Barostat examinations. Tegaserod did not significantly alter balloon volume to pain (primary variable); however, pressure to gastric pain increased (p = 0.044 vs. placebo). The severity of heartburn, regurgitation, early fullness, and bloating was significantly lower following tegaserod vs. placebo treatment (p = 0.026, p = 0.021, p = 0.016, and p = 0.030). Overall symptom improvement was reported by 52% tegaserod vs. 32% placebo patients (p = 0.275), and treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that tegaserod may increase the gastric pain threshold and decrease the severity of individual symptoms in patients with overlapping FH and FD. However, these findings must be considered within the context of the study limitations, including the small number of subjects, potential for and presence of a carry-over effect, along with the impact of Barostat balloon use on the assessment of gastric function.

Exploratory Study of Tegaserod for Dyspepsia in Women Receiving PPIs for Heartburn.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Tegaserod is a selective serotonin receptor (5-HT(4)) agonist that relieves dysmotility symptoms associated with constipation. Here we explore its effects on functional dyspepsia symptoms and heartburn during continued proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. METHODS: In this multicenter pilot study, following a 2-week screening/baseline period, women with functional dyspepsia and persisting heartburn treated with PPIs received add-on open-label tegaserod 6 mg twice daily (bid) for 4 weeks. Treatment responders were then randomized 1:1 to continue double-blind tegaserod or placebo therapy for 6 weeks. Efficacy variables included the proportion of days with satisfactory relief of dyspepsia symptoms (early satiety, postprandial fullness and bloating) as well as the change in individual symptom severity scores for these three cardinal dyspepsia symptoms. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using a validated questionnaire, the Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Of 101 women enrolled, 71 completed open-label treatment, and 70 responders were randomized to double-blind treatment. The proportion of days with satisfactory relief of dyspepsia symptoms (least squares mean, LSM) increased with tegaserod and placebo, to 0.69 and 0.62, respectively at study end (P = 0.366). Similarly, both groups showed improvements in the composite daily symptom severity score (overall LSM change from baseline of 1.55 and 1.57, P = 0.934), and the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (overall LSM change of -39.0 and -37.8, P = 0.537). Tegaserod was well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common AE (8.1% tegaserod, 0% placebo). There were no serious AEs or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: A significant treatment effect was not demonstrated in this study using a treatment-withdrawal methodology. In future studies of functional dyspepsia patients with heartburn, a more rigorous parallel-group study design should be considered.