Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 29(20): 4153-4165, 2023 10 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37363997

RESUMO

PURPOSE: High tumor production of the EGFR ligands, amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG), predicted benefit from anti-EGFR therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a retrospective analysis of clinical trial data. Here, AREG/EREG IHC was analyzed in a cohort of patients who received anti-EGFR therapy as part of routine care, including key clinical contexts not investigated in the previous analysis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients who received panitumumab or cetuximab ± chemotherapy for treatment of RAS wild-type mCRC at eight UK cancer centers were eligible. Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was analyzed for AREG and EREG IHC in six regional laboratories using previously developed artificial intelligence technologies. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 494 of 541 patients (91.3%) had adequate tissue for analysis. A total of 45 were excluded after central extended RAS testing, leaving 449 patients in the primary analysis population. After adjustment for additional prognostic factors, high AREG/EREG expression (n = 360; 80.2%) was associated with significantly prolonged PFS [median: 8.5 vs. 4.4 months; HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-0.95; P = 0.02] and OS [median: 16.4 vs. 8.9 months; HR, 0.66 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; P = 0.002]. The significant OS benefit was maintained among patients with right primary tumor location (PTL), those receiving cetuximab or panitumumab, those with an oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy backbone, and those with tumor tissue obtained by biopsy or surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: High tumor AREG/EREG expression was associated with superior survival outcomes from anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC, including in right PTL disease. AREG/EREG IHC assessment could aid therapeutic decisions in routine practice. See related commentary by Randon and Pietrantonio, p. 4021.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Anfirregulina/metabolismo , Epirregulina/metabolismo , Epirregulina/uso terapêutico , Cetuximab/uso terapêutico , Panitumumabe , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Inteligência Artificial , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intercelular/metabolismo , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 27(8): 2246-2254, 2021 04 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33658300

RESUMO

PURPOSE: There is potential for fecal microbiome profiling to improve colorectal cancer screening. This has been demonstrated by research studies, but it has not been quantified at scale using samples collected and processed routinely by a national screening program. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Between 2016 and 2019, the largest of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme hubs prospectively collected processed guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) samples with subsequent colonoscopy outcomes: blood-negative [n = 491 (22%)]; colorectal cancer [n = 430 (19%)]; adenoma [n = 665 (30%)]; colonoscopy-normal [n = 300 (13%)]; nonneoplastic [n = 366 (16%)]. Samples were transported and stored at room temperature. DNA underwent 16S rRNA gene V4 amplicon sequencing. Taxonomic profiling was performed to provide features for classification via random forests (RF). RESULTS: Samples provided 16S amplicon-based microbial profiles, which confirmed previously described colorectal cancer-microbiome associations. Microbiome-based RF models showed potential as a first-tier screen, distinguishing colorectal cancer or neoplasm (colorectal cancer or adenoma) from blood-negative with AUC 0.86 (0.82-0.89) and AUC 0.78 (0.74-0.82), respectively. Microbiome-based models also showed potential as a second-tier screen, distinguishing from among gFOBT blood-positive samples, colorectal cancer or neoplasm from colonoscopy-normal with AUC 0.79 (0.74-0.83) and AUC 0.73 (0.68-0.77), respectively. Models remained robust when restricted to 15 taxa, and performed similarly during external validation with metagenomic datasets. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiome features can be assessed using gFOBT samples collected and processed routinely by a national colorectal cancer screening program to improve accuracy as a first- or second-tier screen. The models required as few as 15 taxa, raising the potential of an inexpensive qPCR test. This could reduce the number of colonoscopies in countries that use fecal occult blood test screening.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/microbiologia , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Medicina Estatal
3.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(3)2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancers show a highly varied response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiation (RT/CRT) and the impact of the tumor immune microenvironment on this response is poorly understood. Current clinical tumor regression grading systems attempt to measure radiotherapy response but are subject to interobserver variation. An unbiased and unique histopathological quantification method (change in tumor cell density (ΔTCD)) may improve classification of RT/CRT response. Furthermore, immune gene expression profiling (GEP) may identify differences in expression levels of genes relevant to different radiotherapy responses: (1) at baseline between poor and good responders, and (2) longitudinally from preradiotherapy to postradiotherapy samples. Overall, this may inform novel therapeutic RT/CRT combination strategies in rectal cancer. METHODS: We generated GEPs for 53 patients from biopsies taken prior to preoperative radiotherapy. TCD was used to assess rectal tumor response to neoadjuvant RT/CRT and ΔTCD was subjected to k-means clustering to classify patients into different response categories. Differential gene expression analysis was performed using statistical analysis of microarrays, pathway enrichment analysis and immune cell type analysis using single sample gene set enrichment analysis. Immunohistochemistry was performed to validate specific results. The results were validated using 220 pretreatment samples from publicly available datasets at metalevel of pathway and survival analyses. RESULTS: ΔTCD scores ranged from 12.4% to -47.7% and stratified patients into three response categories. At baseline, 40 genes were significantly upregulated in poor (n=12) versus good responders (n=21), including myeloid and stromal cell genes. Of several pathways showing significant enrichment at baseline in poor responders, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, coagulation, complement activation and apical junction pathways were validated in external cohorts. Unlike poor responders, good responders showed longitudinal (preradiotherapy vs postradiotherapy samples) upregulation of 198 immune genes, reflecting an increased T-cell-inflamed GEP, type-I interferon and macrophage populations. Longitudinal pathway analysis suggested viral-like pathogen responses occurred in post-treatment resected samples compared with pretreatment biopsies in good responders. CONCLUSION: This study suggests potentially druggable immune targets in poor responders at baseline and indicates that tumors with a good RT/CRT response reprogrammed from immune "cold" towards an immunologically "hot" phenotype on treatment with radiotherapy.


Assuntos
Mimetismo Biológico/imunologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Transcriptoma , Microambiente Tumoral , Vírus/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Interações Hospedeiro-Patógeno , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Retais/genética , Neoplasias Retais/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia
4.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 3138, 2021 02 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33542447

RESUMO

Liquid biopsy testing utilising Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is rapidly moving towards clinical adoption for personalised oncology. However, before NGS can fulfil its potential any novel testing approach must identify ways of reducing errors, allowing separation of true low-frequency mutations from procedural artefacts, and be designed to improve upon current technologies. Popular NGS technologies typically utilise two DNA capture approaches; PCR and ligation, which have known limitations and seem to have reached a development plateau with only small, stepwise improvements being made. To maximise the ultimate utility of liquid biopsy testing we have developed a highly versatile approach to NGS: Adaptor Template Oligo Mediated Sequencing (ATOM-Seq). ATOM-Seq's strengths and versatility avoid the major limitations of both PCR- and ligation-based approaches. This technology is ligation free, simple, efficient, flexible, and streamlined, and it offers novel advantages that make it perfectly suited for use on highly challenging clinical material. Using reference and clinical materials, we demonstrate detection of known SNVs down to allele frequencies of 0.1% using as little as 20-25 ng of cfDNA, as well as the ability to detect fusions from RNA. We illustrate ATOM-Seq's suitability for clinical testing by showing high concordance rates between paired cfDNA and FFPE clinical samples.


Assuntos
DNA Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , RNA Neoplásico/genética , Alelos , Sequência de Bases , DNA Tumoral Circulante/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo/sangue , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Primers do DNA/síntese química , Primers do DNA/metabolismo , Frequência do Gene , Biblioteca Gênica , Humanos , Biópsia Líquida , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangue , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , RNA Neoplásico/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Br J Cancer ; 117(9): 1286-1294, 2017 Oct 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73-88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty-four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , GTP Fosfo-Hidrolases/genética , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Capecitabina/administração & dosagem , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Classe I de Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases/genética , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA