Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Br J Anaesth ; 133(5): 934-939, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39401865

RESUMO

Patient-physician communication is an integral part of daily anaesthetic practice. Although it is an undeniably powerful means of building a solid therapeutic alliance, several of its fundamental aspects are often overlooked, which can hinder successful communication in the preoperative period. We outline these underexploited elements by analysing the various phases of preoperative patient-physician interactions to provide the practising anaesthesiologist with a useful framework for achieving thoughtful and patient-centred communication.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Comunicação , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Humanos , Anestesiologia/métodos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos
5.
Health Sci Rep ; 7(11): e70164, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39474339

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Over the past decades, the number of cardiac patients (e.g., with advanced heart failure or existing cardiovascular comorbidities that expose them to a heightened risk of acute cardiovascular decompensation) requiring noncardiac surgery is rising. For this patient population, potentially curative surgical treatments may be denied due to their prohibitive perioperative risk. Around 30% of patients undergoing general thoracic surgery experience cardiovascular complications of varying severity that may ultimately result in refractory heart failure and/or hemodynamic instability. In both these scenarios, perioperative implantation of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) may improve patient outcomes by both expanding preoperative surgical eligibility criteria and enabling safer management of unexpected periprocedural complications. This scoping review seeks to summarize the current existing evidence on the role of tMCS for cardiac assistance in thoracic surgery and provide a thorough overview. Methods: We will perform a scoping review adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and the extension for Scoping Reviews of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist (PRISMA). We will carry out a comprehensive search of several online databases to identify studies on the perioperative implantation of tMCS in patients undergoing thoracic surgery to provide cardiac assistance either due to their heightened preoperative cardiac risk (pre-emptive tMCS) or for acute cardiac failure due to inherent surgical complications (bail-out tMCS). Standardized forms will be employed to perform data charting and extraction. Results: Retrieved studies will be presented through a narrative synthesis following initial categorization, supplemented by descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative data if adequate inter-study homogeneity is observed and further complemented by figures and tables. Conclusion: The planned scoping review aims to assess the safety and feasibility of perioperative implantation of tMCS in patients undergoing thoracic surgery either to mitigate their heightened cardiovascular risk or as a rescue strategy in the event of life-threatening surgical complications. It will identify knowledge gaps, offer direction for future research, and improve clinical practices within the field.

6.
J Clin Med ; 13(18)2024 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39336907

RESUMO

Background/Objective: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) poses a substantial public health concern. A collective evaluation of clinical trials is crucial for understanding systemic trends and progress within a specific research area of interest, ultimately shaping future directions. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of trials in the adult OHCA population registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Methods: Aided by medical subject headings (MeSH), we systematically searched the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Trends over time were assessed with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. The association between publication year and annual number was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Out of 152 trials spanning the 2003-2023 period, 29.6% were observational and 70.4% were interventional. Compared with the observational trials, interventional trials were more often randomized (RCT) and achieved full publication status in 84% of cases (p = 0.03). The primary focus of interventional trials was "procedures" (43%), "devices" (23%), and "drugs" (21%). Observational studies focused on "biomarkers" (16%) and "diagnostic test" (13%) (p < 0.001). A decrement in the number of interventional trials with a sample size ≥100 patients across three temporal study points was observed. Nevertheless, published studies predominantly had a sample size ≥100 patients (76%), in contrast to unpublished trials (p ≤ 0.001). An increase in the number of interventional studies funded by the "academic/university" sector was also recorded. Conclusions: Clinical trials on OHCA primarily involved interventions aimed at treatment and were more often randomized, single-center, with small (<100) sample sizes, and funded by the "academic/university" sector.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA