Real-world experience supporting the role of oncologic resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers.

Background: Complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the gold standard for patients with localized cholangiocarcinoma (CC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, this is not always feasible, and recurrence rates remain high. Objectives: To understand the real-world proportions and reason for treatment failure in resected biliary tract cancers. Design and methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of patients with GBC or CC [intrahepatic (IHCC) or extrahepatic (EHCC)] resected between 2005 and 2019 using the BC Cancer provincial database. A chart review was conducted to characterize demographics, treatments received and outcomes. Results: In total, 594 patients were identified of whom 416 (70%) had disease recurrence. Most GBCs (96%) were diagnosed incidentally, and repeat oncologic resection was performed in 45%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was received in 51% of patients diagnosed after 2017 (mostly capecitabine). Patient co-morbidities, disease progression and patient preference were the commonest reasons for not proceeding with adjuvant chemotherapy. One-third of patients did not complete all planned cycles. Median overall survival was significantly higher in those with complete (R0) versus incomplete (R1) resection [31.6 versus 18 months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35-0.53] and in those with versus without re-resection for GBC [29.4 versus 19 months, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.73]. There was a trend towards improved survival with versus without adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02). Only 25% in the more contemporary cohort (2017-2019) had an R0 resection and completed adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: Complete resection, including reresection for incidentally diagnosed GBCs, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved outcomes in this retrospective cohort, yet many patients were not able to complete these treatments. Neoadjuvant strategies may improve treatment delivery and ultimately, outcomes.

Optimizing the number of variants tracked to follow disease burden with circulating tumor DNA assays in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Background: The number of somatic mutations detectable in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is highly heterogeneous in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The optimal number of mutations required to assess disease kinetics is relevant and remains poorly understood. Objectives: To determine whether increasing panel breadth (the number of tracked variants in a ctDNA assay) would alter the sensitivity in detecting ctDNA in patients with mCRC. Design: We used archival tissue sequencing to perform an in silico assessment of the optimal number of tracked mutations to detect and monitor disease kinetics in mCRC using sequencing data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 trial. Methods: For each patient, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 16 of the most clonal (highest variant allele frequency) somatic variants were selected from archival tissue-based whole-exome sequencing and assessed for the proportion of variants detected in matched ctDNA at baseline, week 8, and progression timepoints. Results: Data from 110 patients were analyzed. Genes most frequently encountered among the top four highest VAF variants in archival tissue were TP53 (51.9% of patients), APC (43.3%), KRAS (42.3%), and SMAD4 (9.6%). While the frequency of detecting at least one tracked variant increased when expanding beyond variant pool sizes of 1 and 2 in baseline (p = 0.0030) and progression (p = 0.0030) ctDNA samples, we observed no significant benefit to increases in variant pool size past four variants in any of the ctDNA timepoints (p < 0.05). Conclusion: While increasing panel breadth beyond two tracked variants improved variant re-detection in ctDNA samples from patients with treatment refractory mCRC, increases beyond four tracked variants yielded no significant improvement in variant re-detection.

Controversies and management of deficient mismatch repair gastrointestinal cancers in the neoadjuvant setting.

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype is a distinct molecular signature across gastrointestinal cancers characterized by high tumor mutational burden and high neoantigen load. Tumors harboring dMMR are highly immunogenic and heavily infiltrated by immune cells; consequently, they are uniquely vulnerable to therapeutic strategies enhancing immune antitumor response such as checkpoint inhibitors. The MSI-H/dMMR phenotype arose as a powerful predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors with evidence supporting significantly improved outcomes in the metastatic setting. On the other hand, the genomic instability characteristic of MSI-H/dMMR tumors appears to be associated with decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy, and the benefits of standard adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy approaches in this subtype are being increasingly questioned. Here, we review the prognostic and predictive impact of MMR status in localized gastric and colorectal cancers, and highlight the emerging clinical data incorporating checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting.

Circulating tumor DNA in early-stage colon cancer: ready for prime time or needing refinement?

Liquid biopsies are the detection of molecular information in fluids from patients with cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), the most promising liquid biopsy strategy is the use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma. In early-stage CRC, the potential for ctDNA to impact care stems from the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) to guide adjuvant therapy after curative intent treatment and in identifying recurrences during surveillance. As for any new diagnostic test, ctDNA assays must overcome pre-analytical and analytical challenges before clinical implementation. We will discuss important logistical and assay considerations that clinicians and patients should understand when assessing ctDNA assays. We will also delve into important concepts to aid in interpreting ctDNA results and potential incidental findings that may arise. Sequencing errors, germline variants, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) must be addressed to properly interpret results. CHIP is also an important consideration that impacts patient prognosis through association with cardiovascular and hematologic diseases. With this background in place, we next review the best available evidence for the use of ctDNA in early-stage colon cancer. Observational cohorts have established MRD after surgery as a significant prognostic factor for recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer. It also has the ability to anticipate clinical recurrence before standard investigations when used in surveillance. The first and only interventional randomized trial to date evaluating ctDNA is DYNAMIC. The study demonstrated the noninferiority of a MRD detection-guided approach in selecting patients with stage II colon cancer for adjuvant treatment. Notwithstanding the important results, there are still important questions to be answered before ctDNA enters prime time in the clinic. However, future appears bright and ongoing trials will help clarify how to best use this technology in early-stage colon cancer.

Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes From a Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a population-based cohort of metastatic well-differentiated grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) to describe their characteristics, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. METHODS: The British Columbia provincial database was queried for G3 NETs diagnosed 2004 to 2021, and charts were reviewed to describe clinical features and outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified, most were diagnosed with pancreatic (58.5%) or midgut (26.8%) primary tumor and Ki-67 was less than 55% in 68.3%. The primary was resected in 19 (46.3%) with median disease-free survival of 25.2 months. Once metastatic, patients received a median of one line of systemic therapy. Median overall survival with metastatic disease was 33.8 months. Median progression-free survival was longest in patients treated with capecitabine-temozolomide (20.6 months) or somatostatin analogs (7.9 months), while etoposide-platinum provided little benefit (2.4 months). Limited data of efficacy for targeted therapies and radionuclide therapy was available. Seven patients (17.1%) were also treated with local therapies, which were associated with improved overall survival (median not reached, hazard ratio, 0.23; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine-temozolomide and somatostatin analogs were associated with clinically meaningful benefit, and use of local therapies provided benefits in selected patients. Multidisciplinary discussion is essential to optimize individual outcomes in this heterogeneous population.

Transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Current and future approaches to clinical care: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology Review Paper.

Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematological malignancy in the USA and Europe. Despite improvements in the 5-year and overall survival rates over the past decade, older adults (aged ≥65 years) with multiple myeloma continue to experience disproportionately worse outcomes than their younger counterparts. These differences in outcomes arise from the increased prevalence of vulnerabilities such as medical comorbidities and frailty seen with advancing age that can influence treatment-delivery and tolerance and impact survival. In general, geriatric assessments can help identify those patients more likely to benefit from enhanced toxicity risk-prediction and aid treatment decision-making. Despite the observed benefits of geriatric assessments and other screening frailty tools, provider and systems-level barriers continue to influence the overall perception of the feasibility of geriatric assessments in clinical practice settings. Clinical trials are underway evaluating the efficacy and safety of various multiple myeloma therapies in less fit/frail older adults, with a minority examining fitness-based/risk-adapted approaches. Thus, significant gaps exist in knowing which myeloma therapies are most appropriate for older and more vulnerable adults with multiple myeloma. The purpose of this Review is to discuss how geriatric assessments can be used to guide the management of transplant-ineligible patients; and to highlight frontline therapies for standard-risk and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities [i.e., t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p)] associated with multiple myeloma. We also discuss the current shortcomings of the existing clinical approaches to care and highlight ongoing clinical trials evaluating newer fitness-based approaches to managing transplant-ineligible patients.