Thrombolysis for Wake-Up Stroke Versus Non-Wake-Up Unwitnessed Stroke: EOS Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stroke with unknown time of onset can be categorized into 2 groups; wake-up stroke (WUS) and unwitnessed stroke with an onset time unavailable for reasons other than wake-up (non-wake-up unwitnessed stroke, non-WUS). We aimed to assess potential differences in the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) between these subgroups. METHODS: Patients with an unknown-onset stroke were evaluated using individual patient-level data of 2 randomized controlled trials (WAKE-UP [Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke], THAWS [Thrombolysis for Acute Wake-Up and Unclear-Onset Strokes With Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg]) comparing IVT with placebo or standard treatment from the EOS (Evaluation of Unknown-Onset Stroke Thrombolysis trial) data set. A favorable outcome was prespecified as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. The IVT effect was compared between the treatment groups in the WUS and non-WUS with multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-four patients from 2 trials were analyzed; 542 had WUS (191 women, 272 receiving alteplase), and 92 had non-WUS (42 women, 43 receiving alteplase). Overall, no significant interaction was noted between the mode of onset and treatment effect (P value for interaction=0.796). In patients with WUS, the frequencies of favorable outcomes were 54.8% and 45.5% in the IVT and control groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.16]). Death occurred in 4.0% and 1.9%, respectively (P=0.162), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in 1.8% and 0.3%, respectively (P=0.194). In patients with non-WUS, no significant difference was observed in favorable outcomes relative to the control (37.2% versus 29.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 [0.58-5.37]). One death and one symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage were reported in the IVT group, but none in the control. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the effect of IVT between patients with WUS and non-WUS. IVT showed a significant benefit in patients with WUS, while there was insufficient statistical power to detect a substantial benefit in the non-WUS subgroup. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: CRD42020166903.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin versus albumin 4% in paediatric toxic shock syndrome: a randomised controlled feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare disease responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) therapy in paediatric TSS could improve shock and organ failure, but more consistent efficacy and safety data are needed. Our objective was to determine whether a randomised clinical trial (RCT) assessing intravenous IG in TSS in children is feasible. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, feasibility, double-blind RCT assessing efficacy of high-dose intravenous IG versus albumin 4% (control group) within the first 12 hours of shock onset. Included patients were aged above 1 month and below 18 years with suspected TSS and septic shock. Feasibility was assessed by measuring inclusion rate, protocol compliance and missing data regarding death and the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) Score. Other secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated during hospital stay, at 60 day and 1 year. RESULTS: 28 patients, admitted in 6 paediatric intensive care units during 36 consecutive months and followed for 1 year, received the allocated treatment: 13 in intravenous IG group, 15 in control group. The median age was 10.6 years and the sex ratio was 1. Inclusion rate was above 50%, protocol deviations were below 30% and missing data regarding death and PELOD-2 Score below 10%. No difference concerning secondary clinical outcomes between groups was observed, and more adverse events were reported in the control group. CONCLUSION: It seems to be feasible to conduct an RCT assessing intravenous IG efficacy and safety in paediatric TSS but must be realised internationally, with choice of a clinically relevant endpoint and a specific design in order to be realistic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02219165.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients presenting sepsis-induced immunosuppression: The GRID randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Septic shock is associated in some patients with a profound immunosuppression. We hypothesized that GM-CSF would reduce the occurrence of ICU-acquired infections in immunosuppressed septic patients. METHODS: Randomized double-blind trial conducted between 2015 and 2018. Adult patients, admitted to ICU, with severe sepsis or septic shock presenting with sepsis-induced immunosuppression defined by mHLA-DR < 8000 ABC (antibodies bound per cell) at day 3 were included. Patients were randomized to receive GM-CSF 125 µg/m2 or placebo for 5 days at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the difference in the number of patients presenting≥1 ICU-acquired infection at day 28 or ICU discharge. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped because of insufficient recruitment. A total of 98 patients were included, 54 in the intervention group and 44 in the placebo group. The two groups were similar except for a higher body mass index and McCabe score in the intervention group. No significant difference was observed between groups regarding ICU-acquired infection (11% vs 11%, p = 1.000), 28-day mortality (24% vs 27%,p = 0.900), or the number or localization of the ICU infections. CONCLUSION: GM-CSF had no effect on the prevention of ICU-acquired infection in sepsis immunosuppression, but any conclusion is limited by the early termination of the study leading to low number of included patients.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With White Matter Hyperintensities in the WAKE-UP Trial.

BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin (WMH) are the most prominent imaging feature of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). Previous studies suggest a link between cSVD burden and intracerebral hemorrhage and worse functional outcome after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to determine the impact of WMH burden on efficacy and safety of thrombolysis in the MRI-based randomized controlled WAKE-UP trial of intravenous alteplase in unknown onset stroke. METHODS: The design of this post hoc study was an observational cohort design of a secondary analysis of a randomized trial. WMH volume was quantified on baseline fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of patients randomized to either alteplase or placebo in the WAKE-UP trial. Excellent outcome was defined as score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin Scale after 90 days. Hemorrhagic transformation was assessed on follow-up imaging 24-36 hours after randomization. Treatment effect and safety were analyzed by fitting multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Quality of scans was sufficient in 441 of 503 randomized patients to delineate WMH. Median age was 68 years, 151 patients were female, and 222 patients were assigned to receive alteplase. Median WMH volume was 11.4 mL. Independent from treatment, WMH burden was statistically significantly associated with worse functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.92]), but not with higher chances of any hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.60-1.01]). There was no interaction of WMH burden and treatment group for the likelihood of excellent outcome (P=0.443) or any hemorrhagic transformation (P=0.151). In a subgroup of 166 patients with severe WMH, intravenous thrombolysis was associated with higher odds of excellent outcome (odds ratio, 2.40 [95% CI, 1.19-4.84]) with no significant increase in the rate of hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio, 1.96 [95% CI, 0.80-4.81]). CONCLUSIONS: Although WMH burden is associated with worse functional outcome, there is no association with treatment effect or safety of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ischemic stroke of unknown onset. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01525290.

Patient-Reported Quality of Life After Intravenous Alteplase for Stroke in the WAKE-UP Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intravenous alteplase improves functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke. However, little is known about the effects on self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: WAKE-UP was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-guided intravenous alteplase in stroke with unknown onset time. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 90 days, comprising the EQ-5D index and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). We calculated the effect of treatment on EQ-5D index and EQ VAS using multiple linear regression models. Mediation analysis was performed on stroke survivors to explore the extent to which the effect of alteplase on HRQoL was mediated by functional outcome. RESULTS: Among 490 stroke survivors, the EQ-5D index was available for 452 (92.2%), of whom 226 (50%) were assigned to treatment with alteplase and 226 (50%) to placebo. At 90 days, mean EQ-5D index was higher, reflecting a better health state, in patients randomized to treatment with alteplase than with placebo (0.75 vs 0.67) with an adjusted mean difference of 0.07 (95% CI 0.02-0.12, p = 0.005). In addition, mean EQ VAS was higher with alteplase than with placebo (72.6 vs 64.9), with an adjusted mean difference of 7.6 (95% CI 3.9-11.8, p < 0.001). Eighty-five percent of the total treatment effect of alteplase on the EQ-5D index was mediated using the mRS score while there was no significant direct effect. By contrast, the treatment effect on the EQ VAS was mainly through the direct pathway (60%), whereas 40% was mediated by the mRS. DISCUSSION: Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures reveals a potential benefit of intravenous alteplase for HRQoL beyond improvement of functional outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290; EudraCT number, 2011-005906-32.

Evaluation of a training program for emergency medical service physician dispatchers to reduce emergency departments visits.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (ED) have seen an increasing number of older patients who are mostly referred following a call to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Long waiting times in settings, which are not designed to meet older patients' needs, may increase the risk of hospital-acquired complications. Unnecessary visits should therefore be avoided as much as possible. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether a program to provide geriatric knowledge and tools to the dispatching physicians of the EMS could decrease ED referrals of older patients. METHODS: Design: Before-and-after study with two 6-month periods before and after intervention. PARTICIPANTS: All calls received by a dispatching physician of the Rhône EMS from 8 am to 6 pm concerning patients aged 75 years or above during the study period. INTERVENTION: A program consisting of training dispatching physicians in the specific care of older patients and the developing, with a multidisciplinary team, of specific tools for dispatching physicians. OUTCOME: Proportion of ED referrals of patients aged 75 years or above after a call to the EMS. RESULTS: A total of 2671 calls to the Rhône EMS were included corresponding to 1307 and 1364 patients in the pre-and post-intervention phases, respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportion of referrals to the ED between the pre-intervention (61.7%) and the post-intervention (62.8%) phases (p = 0.57). Contact of the patients with their General Practitioner (GP) in the month preceding the call was associated with a 22% reduced probability of being referred to an ED. CONCLUSIONS: No beneficial effect of the intervention was demonstrated. This strategy of intervention is probably not effective enough in such time-constraint environment. Other strategies with a specific parallel dispatching of geriatric calls by geriatricians should be tested to avoid these unnecessary ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials NCT02712450.

Sex differences in imaging and clinical characteristics of patients from the WAKE-UP trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sex-based differences in acute ischemic stroke are a well-known phenomenon. We aimed to explore these differences between women and men in the Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial. METHODS: We compared baseline demographic and imaging characteristics (visual fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR] positivity, relative FLAIR signal intensity, collateral status) between women and men in all screened patients. In randomized patients (i.e., those with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-FLAIR mismatch), we evaluated a modifying role of sex on the treatment effect of alteplase in multivariable logistic regression, with treatment adjusted for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and age. Dependent variables were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days and distribution of mRS scores at 90 days. RESULTS: Of 1362 screened patients, 529 (38.8%) were women. Women were older than men, had higher baseline NIHSS scores and smoked less frequently. FLAIR positivity of the DWI lesion was equally present in women (174/529, 33.1%) and men (273/833, 33.3%; p = 1.00) and other imaging variables also did not differ between the sexes. In a total of 503 randomized patients, of whom 178 were women (35.4%), sex did not modify the treatment effect of alteplase on mRS score 0-1 or on the total distribution of mRS scores. CONCLUSION: As in many other stroke trials, more men than women were included in the WAKE-UP trial, but the presence of a visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch and the relative FLAIR signal intensity did not differ between the sexes. The treatment effect of alteplase was not modified by sex.

Impact of procedural success on clinical outcome after MitraClip: Results from the MITRA-FR trial.

BACKGROUND: Differences in procedural success rates have been proposed to explain the divergent results between the MITRA-FR trial (Percutaneous Repair with the MitraClip Device for Severe Functional/Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) and the COAPT trial (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation). AIM: To examine whether MITRA-FR patients who had successful clip implantation achieved a better outcome than the control group. METHODS: Based on the per protocol population of MITRA-FR, we compared the outcome in 71 patients in whom optimal clip implantation was achieved (group 1: mitral regurgitation grade ≤ 1 + at discharge) with that in 23 patients with non-optimal clip implantation (group 2: mitral regurgitation grade ≥ 2 + at discharge) and that in 137 patients in the control group (group 3). The primary endpoint was all-cause death or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure at 24 months. RESULTS: Event-free survival was not different across the groups (42±6% in group 1, 30±10% in group 2 and 31±4% in group 3; log-rank P=0.32). In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for age, sex, rhythm, aetiology, left ventricular ejection fraction and mitral regurgitation severity, group was not associated with variations in outcome: using Group 3 as reference, hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.27 (P=0.43) in group 1; and hazard ratio 0.98 95% confidence interval 0.54-1.76 (P=0.94) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome of patients in whom optimal procedural result was achieved at discharge was not different compared with the control group. Our results do not support the hypothesis that the differences in rates of residual mitral regurgitation at discharge between MITRA-FR and COAPT explain the divergent results between the two trials.

Early effect of thrombolysis on structural brain network organisation after anterior-circulation stroke in the randomized WAKE-UP trial.

The symptoms of acute ischemic stroke can be attributed to disruption of the brain network architecture. Systemic thrombolysis is an effective treatment that preserves structural connectivity in the first days after the event. Its effect on the evolution of global network organisation is, however, not well understood. We present a secondary analysis of 269 patients from the randomized WAKE-UP trial, comparing 127 imaging-selected patients treated with alteplase with 142 controls who received placebo. We used indirect network mapping to quantify the impact of ischemic lesions on structural brain network organisation in terms of both global parameters of segregation and integration, and local disruption of individual connections. Network damage was estimated before randomization and again 22 to 36 h after administration of either alteplase or placebo. Evolution of structural network organisation was characterised by a loss in integration and gain in segregation, and this trajectory was attenuated by the administration of alteplase. Preserved brain network organization was associated with excellent functional outcome. Furthermore, the protective effect of alteplase was spatio-topologically nonuniform, concentrating on a subnetwork of high centrality supported in the salvageable white matter surrounding the ischemic cores. This interplay between the location of the lesion, the pathophysiology of the ischemic penumbra, and the spatial embedding of the brain network explains the observed potential of thrombolysis to attenuate topological network damage early after stroke. Our findings might, in the future, lead to new brain network-informed imaging biomarkers and improved prognostication in ischemic stroke.

Alteplase for Stroke With Unknown Onset Time in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with worse stroke outcomes, data regarding the influence of CKD on intravenous thrombolysis outcomes are scarce. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with unknown onset time in patients with CKD. METHODS: Patients with an acute stroke of unknown onset time from the EOS trials (Evaluation of Unknown Onset Stroke Thrombolysis) collaboration were evaluated using an individual patient-level database of randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous thrombolysis with placebo/standard treatment. CKD was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min/1.73m2 Mixed-effect logistic-regression analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 22 to 36 hours and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Baseline data on renal function were available for 688 of 843 patients. Of these, CKD was present in 146 (21%), including 69 of 351 patients receiving alteplase and 77 of 337 patients receiving placebo/standard treatment. Overall, treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome, and CKD did not modify the treatment effect (Pinteraction=0.834). A favorable outcome was observed in 31 of 69 (46%) patients with CKD in the alteplase group and in 28 of 77 (36%) patients with CKD in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.55-2.58]). Among patients with CKD, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 2 patients (3%) in the alteplase group but in none of the controls (P=0.133). At 90 days, death was reported in 3 patients (4%) in the alteplase group compared with 2 patients (3%) in the controls (P=0.539). CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis indicates that the benefit of alteplase does not differ between stroke patients with unknown onset time with and without CKD, although the statistical power was lacking to confirm the efficacy in subgroups. This study only applies to mild-to-moderate or predialysis CKD.

Safety and efficacy of prophylactic levetiracetam for prevention of epileptic seizures in the acute phase of intracerebral haemorrhage (PEACH): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of early seizures (occurring within 7 days of stroke onset) after intracerebral haemorrhage reaches 30% when subclinical seizures are diagnosed by continuous EEG. Early seizures might be associated with haematoma expansion and worse neurological outcomes. Current guidelines do not recommend prophylactic antiseizure treatment in this setting. We aimed to assess whether prophylactic levetiracetam would reduce the risk of acute seizures in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: The double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PEACH trial was conducted at three stroke units in France. Patients (aged 18 years or older) who presented with a non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage within 24 h after onset were randomly assigned (1:1) to levetiracetam (intravenous 500 mg every 12 h) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done with a web-based system and stratified by centre and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline. Treatment was continued for 6 weeks. Continuous EEG was started within 24 h after inclusion and recorded over 48 h. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one clinical seizure within 72 h of inclusion or at least one electrographic seizure recorded on continuous EEG, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment and who had a continuous EEG performed. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02631759, and is now closed. Recruitment was prematurely stopped after 48% of the recruitment target was reached due to a low recruitment rate and cessation of funding. FINDINGS: Between June 1, 2017, and April 14, 2020, 50 patients with mild-to-moderate severity intracerebral haemorrhage were included: 24 were assigned to levetiracetam and 26 to placebo. During the first 72 h, a clinical or electrographic seizure was observed in three (16%) of 19 patients in the levetiracetam group versus ten (43%) of 23 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 0·16, 95% CI 0·03-0·94, p=0·043). All seizures in the first 72 h were electrographic seizures only. No difference in depression or anxiety reporting was observed between the groups at 1 month or 3 months. Depression was recorded in three (13%) patients who received levetiracetam versus four (15%) patients who received placebo, and anxiety was reported for two (8%) patients versus one (4%) patient. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the levetiracetam group versus the placebo group were headache (nine [39%] vs six [24%]), pain (three [13%] vs ten [40%]), and falls (seven [30%] vs four [16%]). The most frequent serious adverse events were neurological deterioration due to the intracerebral haemorrhage (one [4%] vs four [16%]) and severe pneumonia (two [9%] vs two [8%]). No treatment-related death was reported in either group. INTERPRETATION: Levetiracetam might be effective in preventing acute seizures in intracerebral haemorrhage. Larger studies are needed to determine whether seizure prophylaxis improves functional outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.

Association of White Blood Cell Count With Clinical Outcome Independent of Treatment With Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Introduction: Higher white blood cell (WBC) count is associated with poor functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, little is known about whether the association is modified by treatment with intravenous alteplase. Methods: WAKE-UP was a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]-based thrombolysis in unknown onset stroke. WBC count was measured on admission and again at 22-36 h after randomization to treatment (follow-up). Favorable outcome was defined by a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) 90 days after stroke. Further outcome were stroke volume and any hemorrhagic transformation (HT) that were assessed on follow-up CT or MRI. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between outcome and WBC count and treatment group. Results: Of 503 randomized patients, WBC count and baseline parameters were available in 437 patients (µ = 64.7 years, 35.2% women) on admission and 355 patients (µ = 65.1 years, 34.1% women) on follow-up. Median WBC count on admission was 7.6 × 109/L (interquartile range, IQR, 6.1-9.4 × 109/L) and 8.2 × 109/L (IQR, 6.7-9.7 × 109/L) on follow-up. Higher WBC count both on admission and follow-up was associated with lower odds of favorable outcome, adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale Score, temperature, and treatment (alteplase vs. placebo, adjusted odds ratio, aOR 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.94 and aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.97). No interaction between WBC count and treatment group was observed (p = 0.11). Furthermore, WBC count on admission and follow-up was significantly associated with HT (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05-1.24 and aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.26). Finally, WBC count on follow-up was associated with larger stroke volume (aOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.08-6.07). Conclusion: Higher WBC count is associated with unfavorable outcome, an increased risk of HT, and larger stroke volume, independent of treatment with alteplase. Whether immunomodulatory manipulation of WBC count improves stroke outcome needs to be tested. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01525290.

Delayed hospitalisation for heart failure after transcatheter repair or medical treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation: a landmark analysis of the MITRA-FR trial.

BACKGROUND: In the MITRA-FR trial, transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) was not associated with a 2-year clinical benefit in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). AIMS: This landmark analysis aimed at investigating a potential reduction of the hospitalisation rate for heart failure (HF) between 12 and 24 months after inclusion in the MITRA-FR trial in patients randomised to the intervention group (TMVR with the MitraClip device), as compared with patients randomised to the control group (guideline-directed medical therapy [GDMT]). METHODS: The MITRA-FR trial randomised 307 patients with SMR for TMVR on top of GDMT (TMVR group; n=152) or for GDMT alone (control group; n=155). We conducted a 12-month landmark analysis in surviving patients who were not hospitalised for HF within the first 12 months of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the 1-year cumulative number of HF hospitalisations. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients (TMVR group: 67; GDMT group: 73) were selected for this landmark analysis with similar characteristics at inclusion in the trial. The primary endpoint was 28 events per 100 patient-years in the TMVR group, as compared with 60 events per 100 patient-years in the GDMT group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-1.02; p=0.057). CONCLUSIONS: In this landmark analysis of the MITRA-FR trial, the cumulative rate of HF hospitalisation between 12 and 24 months among patients treated with TMVR on top of GDMT was approximately half as many as those of patients treated with GDMT alone, a difference which did not reach statistical significance in the setting of a low number of events.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Quantification to Predict Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch Status in Ischemic Stroke With Unknown Onset.

BACKGROUND: Visual rating of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch can be challenging. We evaluated quantification of DWI and FLAIR to predict DWI-FLAIR mismatch status in ischemic stroke. METHODS: In screened patients from the WAKE-UP trial (Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke), we retrospectively studied relative DWI (rDWI SI) and FLAIR signal intensity (rFLAIR SI). We defined the optimal mean rFLAIR SI and interquartile range of the rDWI SI in the DWI lesion to predict DWI-FLAIR mismatch status. We investigated agreement between each quantitative parameter and the DWI-FLAIR mismatch and the association between both quantitative parameters. We evaluated the predictive value of the quantitative parameters for excellent functional outcome by logistic regression, adjusted for DWI lesion volume, treatment, age, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. RESULTS: In the rFLAIR and rDWI SI analysis, 213/369 and 241/421 subjects respectively had a DWI-FLAIR mismatch. A mean rFLAIR SI cutoff of 1.09 and interquartile range rDWI SI cutoff of 0.47 were optimal to predict the DWI-FLAIR mismatch with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% (95% CI, 71%-83%) and 67% (95% CI, 59%-74%), and 76% (95% CI, 70%-81%) and 72% (95% CI, 65%-79%), respectively. For both quantitative parameters, agreement with the DWI-FLAIR mismatch was fair (73%, κ=0.44 [95% CI, 0.35-0.54] for rFLAIR and 74%, κ=0.48 [95% CI, 0.39-0.56] for rDWI). Both quantitative parameters correlated moderately (Pearson R=0.54 [95% CI, 0.46-0.61]; P<0.001, n=367). The interquartile range rDWI SI (n=188), but not the mean rFLAIR SI (n=172), was an independent predictor of excellent functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.67 per 0.1 unit increase of interquartile range rDWI SI, 95% CI, 0.51-0.89, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between the quantitative and qualitative approach may be insufficient to advocate DWI or FLAIR quantification as alternative for visual rating.

Cerebral Microbleeds and Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke: An Analysis of the WAKE-UP Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in patients with acute ischemic stroke and are associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. Whether CMBs modify the treatment effect of thrombolysis is unknown. METHODS: We performed a prespecified analysis of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial including patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of symptom onset and diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch on MRI receiving alteplase or placebo. Patients were screened and enrolled between September 2012 and June 2017 (with final follow-up in September 2017). Patients were randomized to treatment with IV thrombolysis with alteplase at 0.9 mg/kg body weight or placebo. CMB status (presence, number, and distribution) was assessed after study completion by 3 raters blinded to clinical information following a standardized protocol. Outcome measures were excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1, and symptomatic ICH according to National Institutes of Neurological Disease and Stroke trial criteria 22 to 36 hours after treatment. RESULTS: Of 503 patients enrolled in the WAKE-UP trial, 459 (91.3%; 288 [63%] men) were available for analysis. Ninety-eight (21.4%) had at least 1 CMB on baseline imaging; 45 (9.8%) had exactly 1 CMB; 37 (8.1%) had 2 to 4 CMBs; and 16 (3.5%) had ≥5 CMBs. Presence of CMBs was associated with a nonsignificant increased risk of symptomatic ICH (11.2% vs 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-5.43, p = 0.052) but had no effect on functional outcome at 90 days (mRS score ≤1: 45.8% vs 50.7%; adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.59-1.64, p = 0.955). Patients receiving alteplase had better functional outcome (mRS score ≤1: 54.6% vs 44.6%, adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.43, p = 0.022) without evidence of heterogeneity in relation to CMB presence (p of the interactive term = 0.546). Results were similar for subpopulations with strictly lobar (presumed cerebral amyloid angiopathy related) or not strictly lobar CMB distribution. DISCUSSION: In the randomized-controlled WAKE-UP trial, we saw no evidence of reduced treatment effect of alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke with ≥1 CMBs. Additional studies are needed to determine the treatment effect of alteplase and its benefit-harm ratio in patients with a larger number of CMBs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01525290; ClinicalTrialsRegister.EU identifier 2011-005906-32. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset and diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch who received IV alteplase, CMBs are not significantly associated with functional outcome at 90 days.

Estimating nocturnal stroke onset times by magnetic resonance imaging in the WAKE-UP trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences have gained a role to guide treatment of patients with unknown time of stroke symptom onset. Evolution of signal intensities in FLAIR is associated with time since stroke onset with continuous linear increases. AIMS: Estimating symptom onset during night-sleep in patients from the WAKE-UP trial based on relative signal intensities FLAIR (FLAIR-rSI) from acute stroke lesions an independent dataset (PRE-FLAIR study). METHODS: FLAIR-rSI was quantified in stroke lesions in PRE-FLAIR and WAKE-UP. The PRE-FLAIR study was a multicenter observational trial establishing FLAIR as a surrogate parameter for time since stroke onset. WAKE-UP was a randomized controlled trial that revealed a benefit for alteplase in patients selected based on a DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Stroke onset times were recorded in PRE-FLAIR and used to fit a linear regression model with FLAIR-rSI, adjusted for patient age and lesion volume. The model was applied to FLAIR-rSI of stroke lesions to estimate onset times in those patients enrolled in WAKE-UP who had symptom onset during night-sleep. RESULTS: FLAIR-rSI was quantified in 399 patients from PRE-FLAIR. Linear regression indicated a significant association of age (p = 0.001), lesion volume (p = 0.005) and FLAIR-rSI (p < 0.001) with time since symptom onset (adjusted R2 = 0.179). In 813 patients from WAKE-UP, distribution of times of last seen well, symptom recognition and MRI examination were recorded. Median times of last seen well were 1 h before midnight (IQR 2.4 h) and symptom recognition 7 h after midnight (IRQ 2.2 h). Based on the FLAIR-rSI profiles, we estimated median stroke onset 6.1 h after midnight (IQR 2.7 h). CONCLUSION: Nocturnal strokes during night-sleep may predominantly occur during the early morning hours. Our results are in line with evidence of characteristic diurnal patterns of cardiovascular events.

The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Digestive or Lung Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a chronic disease with an incidence of 24.5 million and 9.6 million deaths worldwide in 2017. Lung and colorectal cancer are the most common cancers for both sexes and, according to national and international recommendations, platinum-based chemotherapy is the reference adjuvant treatment. This chemotherapy can be moderately to highly emetogenic. Despite antiemetic therapy, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) may persist. Moreover, cancer patients are increasingly interested in alternative and complementary medicines and have expressed the desire that nonpharmacological treatments be used in hospitals. Among alternative and complementary medicines, foot reflexology significantly decreases the severity of CINV in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to assess the benefits of foot reflexology as a complement therapy to conventional treatments regarding the severity of acute CINV in patients with digestive or lung cancer. The secondary objectives assessed were the frequency and severity of delayed CINV, quality of life, anxiety, and self-esteem. METHODS: This study was conducted between April 2018 and April 2020 in the Hospices Civils de Lyon, France. This was an open-label randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into two groups: the intervention group (ie, conventional care with foot reflexology; n=40) and the control group (ie, conventional care without foot reflexology; n=40). Foot reflexology sessions (30 minutes each) were performed on outpatients or inpatients. Eligible participants were patients with lung or digestive cancer with an indication for platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: The severity of acute nausea and vomiting was assessed with a visual analog scale during the second cycle of chemotherapy. A significant increase of at least 2 points was observed for the control group (7/34, 21%; P=.001). Across all cycles, the foot reflexology group showed a trend toward less frequent delayed nausea (P=.28), a significantly less frequent consumption of antiemetic drugs (P=.04), and no significant difference for vomiting (P=.99); there was a trend toward a perception of stronger severity for delayed nausea in the control group (P=.39). Regarding quality of life and anxiety, there was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group (P=.32 and P=.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study's results indicate that foot reflexology provides significantly better management of acute nausea severity and decreased consumption of antiemetic drugs in patients with lung or digestive cancer. In order to fulfill patients' desires to use nonpharmacological treatments and complementary and alternative medicines in hospitals, foot reflexology could be provided as a complementary intervention to conventional antiemetic drugs. Foot reflexology did not result in adverse effects. To assess the benefits of foot reflexology in routine practice, a larger study with several health care centers would be needed with a cluster randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03508180; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03508180. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/17232.

Cost-Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Thrombolysis for Patients With Stroke With Unknown Time of Onset.

OBJECTIVES: Patients waking up with stroke symptoms are often excluded from intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (IV-tpa). The WAKE-UP trial, a European multicenter randomized controlled trial, proved the clinical effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-guided IV-tpa for these patients. This analysis aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared to placebo. METHODS: A Markov model was designed to analyze the cost-effectiveness over a 25-year time horizon. The model consisted of an inpatient acute care phase and a rest-of-life phase. Health states were defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Initial transition probabilities to mRS scores were based on WAKE-UP data and health state utilities on literature search. Costs were based on data from the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, literature, and expert opinion. Incremental costs and effects over the patients' lifetime were estimated. The analysis was conducted from a formal German healthcare perspective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Treatment with IV-tpa resulted in cost savings of €51 009 and 1.30 incremental gains in quality-adjusted life-years at a 5% discount rate. Univariate sensitivity analysis revealed incremental cost-effectiveness ratio being sensitive to the relative risk of favorable outcome on mRS for placebo patients after stroke, the costs of long-term care for patients with mRS 4, and patient age at initial stroke event. In all cases, IV-tpa remained cost-effective. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis proved IV-tpa cost-effective in >95% of the simulations results. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided IV-tpa compared to placebo is cost-effective in patients with ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset.

Serious Adverse Events and Their Impact on Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke in the WAKE-UP Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: During the first days and weeks after an acute ischemic stroke, patients are prone to complications that can influence further treatment, recovery, and functional outcome. In clinical trials, severe complications are recorded as serious adverse events (SAE). We analyzed the effect of SAE on functional outcome and predictors of SAE in the randomized controlled WAKE-UP trial (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke). METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of WAKE-UP, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of magnetic resonance imaging-guided intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke and unknown time of onset. Functional outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale 90 days after the stroke. SAE were reported to a central safety desk and recorded and categorized by organ system using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology. We used logistic regression analysis to determine the effect of SAE on functional outcome and linear multiple regression analysis to identify baseline predictors of SAE. RESULTS: Among 503 patients randomized, 199 SAE were reported for n=110 (22%) patients. Of those patients who did suffer a SAE, 20 (10%) had a fatal outcome. Patients suffering from at least one SAE had a lower odds of reaching a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.21-0.61], P<0.001). Higher age (P=0.04) and male sex (P=0.01) were predictors for the occurrence of SAE. CONCLUSIONS: SAEs were observed in about one in 5 patients, were more frequent in elderly and male patients and were associated with worse functional outcome. These results may help to assess the risk of SAE in future stroke trials and create awareness for severe complications after stroke in clinical practice. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01525290. URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu; Unique identifier: 2011-005906-32.