Phase 1 clinical trials of the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccines encoding influenza A virus H5 hemagglutinin.

BACKGROUND: Development of vaccines against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 subtypes posing a pandemic threat remains a priority. Limitations in manufacturing capacity and production time of conventional inactivated vaccines highlight the need for additional approaches. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies involving a total of 103 healthy adults who received two intramuscular injections of Vaxfectin-adjuvanted plasmid DNA vaccine or placebo 21 days apart. Vaccine cohorts received either a monovalent vaccine containing an A/Vietnam/1203/04 H5 hemagglutinin-encoding plasmid or a trivalent vaccine with plasmids encoding H5, NP, and M2 proteins in doses from 0.1 to 1mg of DNA/injection. RESULTS: All doses were well tolerated without vaccine-related serious adverse events or discontinuations. In the monovalent cohorts, hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers of > or =40 and 4-fold rises from baseline were achieved in 47-67% of subjects and H5-specific T-cell responses in 75-100%. Trivalent cohorts had lower HI response rates (< or = 20%), but 72% of subjects achieved T-cell and/or antibody responses to one or more antigens. CONCLUSIONS: Vaxfectin-adjuvanted monovalent H5 DNA vaccines were well tolerated and induced HI response rates and titers in the reported range of inactivated protein-based H5 vaccines, suggesting that adjuvanted DNA vaccines with rapid vaccine production could be useful for pandemic control.

Safety and immunogenicity of a bivalent cytomegalovirus DNA vaccine in healthy adult subjects.

BACKGROUND: VCL-CB01, a candidate cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA vaccine that contains plasmids encoding CMV phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) and glycoprotein B (gB) to induce cellular and humoral immune responses and that is formulated with poloxamer CRL1005 and benzalkonium chloride to enhance immune responses, was evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial. METHODS: VCL-CB01 was evaluated in 44 healthy adult subjects (22 CMV seronegative and 22 CMV seropositive) 18-43 years old. Thirty-two subjects received 1- or 5-mg doses of vaccine on a 0-, 2-, and 8-week schedule, and 12 subjects received 5-mg doses of vaccine on a 0-, 3-, 7-, and 28-day schedule. RESULTS: Overall, the vaccine was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. Local reactions included mild to moderate injection site pain and tenderness, induration, and erythema. Systemic reactions included mild to moderate malaise and myalgia. All reactions resolved without sequelae. Through week 16 of the study, immunogenicity, as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay and/or ex vivo interferon (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay, was documented in 45.5% of CMV-seronegative subjects and in 25.0% of CMV-seropositive subjects who received the full vaccine series, and 68.1% of CMV-seronegative subjects had memory IFN-gamma T cell responses at week 32. CONCLUSION: The safety and immunogenicity data from this trial support further evaluation of VCL-CB01.