Impact of superior hypogastric nerve block during uterine fibroid embolisation on pain scores, opioid requirements, and same-day discharge: a case-control study.

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) in managing periprocedural pain associated with uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) and in facilitating same-day discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively enrolled case-control study with retrospective analysis comprising 119 eligible patients who underwent UFE for symptomatic fibroids was undertaken at a UK teaching hospital between January 2016 and September 2022. SHNB was administered to 62 participants in addition to systemic analgesia; 57 participants received systemic analgesia alone. SHNB was performed mid-UFE using 20 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine. Pain scores were assessed using an 11-point (0-10) verbal numerical rating scale (NRS). The study received research and ethics committee approval. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square and independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value of <0.05 defined significance. RESULTS: Participants who received SHNB experienced significantly less pain during the first 6 h post-procedure (averaged median pain score 2.6 versus 3.8, p=0.031). SHNB reduced the proportion of participants requiring post-procedural anti-emetics (45% versus 63%, p<0.05). For participants entered on the day-case pathway (SHNB = 34, no-SHNB = 16), those who received SHNB had a higher rate of successful same-day discharge (62% versus 31%, p=0.044). This SHNB group required significantly less opioids for periprocedural pain relief (median oral morphine equivalents; 44 mg versus 80 mg, p=0.020). No SHNB-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: SHNB is safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain, opioid requirements, and anti-emetic use in patients undergoing UFE for symptomatic fibroids. SHNB, as an adjunct to analgesic optimisation, facilitates same-day discharge, which is often limited by severe post-embolisation pain.

Comparison of bilateral to unilateral total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) has become the treatment of choice in many centers for patients with inguinal hernia (IH). Our aim was to compare the morbidity outcomes of bilateral vs unilateral IH repair using the laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal (TEP) technique, to determine whether undertaking bilateral IH repair places patients at additional risk. METHODS: Manuscripts published up to the end of 2021 on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Patients (> 16 years) undergoing a primary elective unilateral or bilateral TEP operation, using the standard 3-port laparoscopic technique, were identified. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible. Where this was not possible, vote counting was conducted using effect direction plots. RESULTS: Eight observational studies, with a total of 18,153 patients were included. Operative time was significantly longer for bilateral operations. There was no significant difference in conversion to open, post-operative seroma, urinary retention, haematoma, and length of hospital stay. There was an increased rate of hernia recurrence in patients undergoing bilateral IH repair. CONCLUSION: Although limited by the observational nature of the included studies, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest a differential burden of morbidity between unilateral and bilateral TEP IH repair. As all included papers are from observational studies only, evidence from all outcomes is at best very low quality. This manuscript thereby highlights a need for randomized controlled trials to be conducted in this area.

Safety of short 3-hour recovery and same-day discharge following lower-limb angioplasty in outpatients with intermittent claudication and critical limb ischaemia.

AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of short recovery day-case pathway following lower-limb angioplasty in both intermittent claudication and critical limb ischaemia patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of the medical records of consecutive outpatients treated with lower-limb angioplasty over a 1-year period within an interventional radiology (IR) day-case unit in a high-volume vascular centre. Standard post-angioplasty care at York Teaching Hospital is discharge 3 h after puncture site haemostasis without the routine use of closure devices. The rates of successful same-day discharge, procedure success, complications, and re-admissions were calculated with 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: The cohort included 301 patients (57% intermittent claudication and 43% critical limb ischaemia) undergoing 605 angioplasties using access sheath size ranging from 4 to 7 F. Closure devices were used in only 7% of patients. Successful same-day discharge achieved in 98% of patients (294/301), with seven admitted overnight because of complications. Eleven patients (3.6%) were re-admitted within 30 days. Technical success rates were 92%, and 96% when including partially successful interventions, with 4% technical failure. Twelve patients (4%) developed minor complications and four major complications (1%). There were no significant differences in complication rates between small and larger sheath sizes (p>0.05). No procedure-related death was recorded within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Lower-limb angioplasty can be performed safely as day-case procedure with a short recovery protocol within IR departments for both patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). This may significantly increase patient throughput and alleviate pressure on stretched hospital inpatient resources by safely discharging patients on the day of procedure.

Is computed tomography of the body overused? An audit of 2068 attendances in a large acute hospital.

Computed tomography (CT) delivers a substantial proportion of the medical radiation dose to the population. The National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) recommends that "CT examinations should only be carried out after there has been proper clinical justification for the examination of each individual by an experienced radiologist". The aim of this study was to review the indications for body CT in a large acute hospital in order to identify groups of patients in whom CT might not be "clinically justified". We reviewed the age, sex and diagnosis of all patients undergoing CT of the abdomen and pelvis (including lumbar spine) in our department in 1992. All requests had been checked by a senior radiologist before booking. CT was performed in 1078 male patients and in 990 females. Patients examined for benign disease were younger (mean age 52 years) than patients with malignant disease (mean age 57 years). Of 915 examinations performed for benign disease, 293 (32%) were orthopaedic in nature and included 255 (87%) for back pain. CT was carried out for benign non-orthopaedic disease in 97 women under 50 years old, usually following other tests with inconclusive or normal results. 49 of these examinations were reported as normal. Of 191 patients who had more than one CT examination, 158 (83%) were undergoing follow-up for malignant disease. All 39 patients who underwent CT on three or more occasions had life-threatening conditions, either malignancy or complicated acute pancreatitis. We have been unable to find substantial numbers of patients in whom CT was performed inappropriately. Substitution of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for CT of the spine will help population dose reduction. The benign condition responsible for the largest radiation dose from CT is complicated acute pancreatitis, and it may be possible to substitute MRI for CT in these patients. Women under 50 years old with normal CT form an important group for clinical audit.

Aggressive versus withdrawn unpopular children: variations in peer and self-perceptions in multiple domains.

The present study examines whether subgroups of unpopular children differ in terms of competence in multiple domains. Specifically, subgroups of aggressive unpopular, withdrawn unpopular, and aggressive-withdrawn unpopular and average status children were identified on the basis of peer evaluations. The subgroups were then compared in terms of peer and self-perceptions of competence in various nonsocial and social domains. Results indicated that the 3 subgroups of unpopular children exhibited distinct profiles according to peer perceptions, with aggressive-withdrawn unpopular children being viewed as deficient in virtually every area assessed, and aggressive unpopular and withdrawn unpopular children viewed as exhibiting particular strengths and weaknesses across domains. In terms of self-perceptions, results indicated that withdrawn-unpopular children expressed more accurate, but negative self-evaluations, while children in the aggressive subgroups tended to overestimate their competencies.

Assessment.

The role of the occupational therapist in today's health care system is discussed in relation to the large numbers of patients with treatment problems and the relatively small numbers in the profession. The importance of good, efficient assessment procedures is emphasized in order to maximize the profession's helpfulness. Review of current practices among occupational therapists in carrying out the assessment function is presented along with data from a survey of therapists in physical disabilities practice. The article concludes with a plea for the increased use of standardized evaluation tools by occupational therapists to both make their efforts more effective and to build credibility for the services of the profession.