General practitioners' assessment and management of chronic kidney disease in older patients- a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly managed in general practice, with established guidelines for diagnosis and management. CKD is more prevalent in the older population, and is associated with lifestyle diseases as well as social deprivation. Older patients also commonly experience multimorbidity. Current CKD guidelines do not take age into account, with the same diagnostic and management recommendations for patients regardless of their age. We sought to investigate general practitioners' (GPs') approach to older patients with CKD, and whether their assessment and management differed from guideline recommendations. We explored the reasons for variation from guideline recommendations. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study of Australian GPs. An online anonymous survey about the use of CKD guidelines, and assessment and management of CKD was sent to 9500 GPs. Four hundred and sixty-nine (5%) of GPs responded, and the survey was completed by 399 GPs. Subsequently, 27 GPs were interviewed in detail about their diagnostic and management approach to older patients with declining kidney function. RESULTS: In the survey, 48% of GPs who responded found the CKD guidelines useful for diagnosis and management. Four themes arose from our interviews: age-related decline in kidney function; whole person care; patient-centred care; and process of care that highlighted the importance of continuity of care. GPs recognised that older patients have an inherently high risk of lower kidney function. The GPs reported management of that higher risk focused on managing the whole person (not just a single disease focus) and being patient-centred. Patient-centred care expressed the importance of quality of life, shared decision making and being symptom focused. There was also a recognition that there is a difference between a sudden decline in kidney function and a stable but low kidney function and GPs would manage these situations differently. CONCLUSIONS: GPs apply guidelines in the management of CKD in older patients using a patient-centred and whole person approach to care. Older patients have a high prevalence of multimorbidity, which GPs carefully considered when applying existing CKD-specific guidelines. Future iterations of CKD Guidelines need to give due consideration to multimorbidity in older patients that can adversely impact on kidney function in addition to the expected age-related functional decline.

Chronic kidney disease - alternative labels used by Australian general practitioners. A qualitative interview study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for terminology defining chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been in use for 20 years. Age is not currently considered in the guideline definition of CKD. In previous studies, General Practitioners (GPs) have been reluctant to give older patients the label of CKD. AIM: Our study aimed to determine what language general practitioners are using to describe or label chronic kidney disease with their older patients, and to explore the reasons for their use of alternative language. DESIGN & SETTING: This was a descriptive qualitative interview study of Australian GPs. METHOD: Twenty-seven GPs were recruited via email and interviewed regarding their management of CKD., GPs were asked what language and terminology they used when discussing a diagnosis of CKD with their older patients. RESULTS: "Labelling of CKD", the language that GPs use when talking about CKD with their patients, emerged as a major theme from the initial GP interviews. Sub-themes emerged, including: types of labels, alternate labels and rationale for alternate labelling. GPs used descriptions of "reduced kidney function" to explain CKD to their patients, either in parallel with the diagnosis of CKD or instead of it. GPs had concerns about the words "chronic" and "disease" and used different terminology to explain these words to patients when diagnosing them with CKD. CONCLUSION: GPs use alternative descriptions to explain mild decrease in kidney function with older patients. Alternative labels that denote level of risk to older patients, without creating unnecessary concern about normal age-related kidney function need to be explored.