RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of pediatric food allergy (FA) has increased in the past 2 decades. The previous literature suggests that FA presents burdens, both economically and psychosocially, to children and their caregivers, especially families in lower-income strata. Using data from a previously published needs assessment, the Food Allergy Management in Low-Income Youth study, the FA Passport and Workbook tools were developed to address identified needs. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the utility of the FA Passport in helping families insured by Medicaid to manage FA better and improve quality of life. METHODS: Families insured through Illinois Medicaid were recruited from two Chicago-based allergy clinics. Caregivers of children with FA completed a pretest evaluating knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding FA management. A clinician guided caregivers through the FA Passport. The caregivers then completed a posttest immediately afterward and again 3 months later. Changes were evaluated from baseline responses and direct feedback was elicited about the tool. RESULTS: The FA Passport successfully improved caregiver-reported confidence with epinephrine autoinjector use (from 69% to 93%), caregiver anaphylaxis recognition (from 66% to 73%), and reported quality of life, and it nearly doubled caregiver comfort regarding leaving the child in the care of others (from 40% to 75.7%). Caregivers rated the FA Passport tool as extremely helpful overall (9.4 out of 10). CONCLUSIONS: The FA Passport is a novel FA clinical support tool that addresses barriers to proper FA management described in previous studies. It proved effective at improving caregiver comfort with regarding leaving the food-allergic children with other caregivers, increasing FA knowledge, and improving the quality of life in families affected by FA.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Epinefrina , Alérgenos , CuidadoresRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of women seeking fertility care in a state with mandated insurance coverage for fertility testing and treatment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey. SETTING: Academic fertility center in Illinois. PATIENTS: Of 5,000 consecutive fertility care patients, 1,460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Details about demographic characteristics and health care access on the basis of patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 36.1 years; 75.5% were White, 10.2% Asian, 7.3% Black, 5.7% Latinx, and 1.3% Other. Most women had a bachelor's (35.5%) or master's degree (40.5%) and an annual household income of >$100,000 (81.5%). Black and Hispanic women traveled twice as far (median 10 miles) as White and Asian women (median 5 miles for both) for treatment. Black women (14.7%) were more likely to report that their race was a barrier to getting fertility treatment compared with White (0.0%), Hispanic (5.1%), and Asian (5.4%) women. Black and Hispanic women were approximately twice as likely to report income level (26.5% and 20.3%, respectively) and weight (7.8% and 8.9%, respectively) as barriers compared with White and Asian respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial and socioeconomic disparities exist among fertility patients accessing care. Beyond providing all Americans with health insurance that covers fertility treatment, further research in the general population is needed to understand the complex social, cultural, racial, and economic factors that prohibit many individuals from accessing needed fertility care.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To better understand the beliefs about a causal role of emotional stress maintained by women seeking fertility care. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was distributed to fertility care patients at an academic fertility center in Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample. RESULTS: Members of our sample (N = 1460) were between 20 and 58 years (mean = 36.2, SD = 4.4). Most respondents were White (72.2%), were in a heterosexual relationship (86.8%), and felt that their physician understood their cultural background (79.4%). Of the sample, 28.9% believed emotional stress could cause infertility, 69.0% believed emotional stress could reduce success with fertility treatment, and 31.3% believed that emotional stress could cause a miscarriage, with evidence of significant racial differences. Less than a quarter (23.8%) of the sample believed emotional stress had no impact on fertility. Lower household income and educational attainment were associated with a greater belief in emotional stress as a causative factor in reproduction with regard to infertility, fertility treatment, and miscarriage. CONCLUSION: The majority of women seeking fertility care believe emotional stress could reduce the success of fertility treatment. Furthermore, beliefs about emotional stress and reproduction significantly differ based on race/ethnicity, income, and education. Particular attention should be paid to specific groups of women who may more likely not be aware of the lack of a proven biological relationship between emotional stress and reproduction.
Assuntos
Fertilidade/fisiologia , Infertilidade/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , Reprodução/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Infertilidade/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although infertility affects an estimated 6.1 million individuals in the United States, only half of those individuals seek fertility treatment and the majority of those patients are White and of high socioeconomic status. Research has shown that insurance mandates are not enough to ensure equal access. Many workplaces, schools, and medical education programs have made efforts in recent years to improve the cultural humility of providers in efforts to engage more racially and economically underrepresented groups in medical care. However, these efforts have not been assessed on a population of patients receiving fertility care, an experience that is uniquely shaped by individual social, cultural, and economic factors. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to better understand the racial, cultural, economic, and religious factors that impact patient experiences obtaining fertility care. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional self-administered survey was administered at an academic fertility center in Chicago, Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive fertility care patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample. No interventions were used. Descriptive univariate frequencies and percentages were calculated to summarize sociodemographic and other relevant patient characteristics (eg, race or ethnicity, age, household income, religious affiliation, insurance coverage). Rates of endorsing perceived physician cultural competency were compared among demographic subgroups using Pearson chi-squared tests with 2-sided P<.05 indicative of statistical significance. To identify the key determinants of patient-reported worry regarding 9 different fertility treatment outcomes and related concerns, a series of multiple logistic regression models were fit to examine factors associated with patient report of being "very worried" or "extremely worried." RESULTS: Members of our sample (N=1460) were between 20 and 58 years of age (meanadjusted, 36.2; standard deviation, 4.4). Among Black participants, 42.3% reported that their physician does not understand their cultural background compared with 16.5% of White participants (P<.0001). Participants who identified as Latinx were significantly more likely than White participants to report being very/extremely worried about side effects of treatment, a miscarriage, ectopic pregnancies, and birth defects (P<.05, P=.02, P=.002, P=.001, respectively). Individuals who identify as Hindu were nearly 4 times more likely to report being very/extremely worried about experiencing an ectopic pregnancy than nonreligious participants (P<.0002). Respondents most strongly identified the biology or physiology of the couple (meanadjusted, 21.6; confidence interval, 20.4-22.7) and timing or age (meanadjusted, 27.8; confidence interval, 26.5-29.1) as being associated with fertility. Overall, respondents most strongly disagreed that the ability to bear children rests upon God's will (meanadjusted, 65.4; confidence interval, 63.7-67.1), which differed most significantly by race (P<.0001) and religion (P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Of the patient characteristics investigated, racial and ethnic subgroups showed the greatest degree of variation in regard to worries and concerns surrounding the experience of fertility treatment. Our findings emphasize a need for improved cultural humility on behalf of physicians, in addition to affordable psychological support for all patients seeking fertility care.
Assuntos
Infertilidade/psicologia , Infertilidade/terapia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Povo Asiático , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Chicago , Estudos Transversais , Cultura , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Infertilidade/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Gravidez Múltipla/psicologia , Religião , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , População BrancaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although sensor-based monitoring of daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and short-acting ß-agonist medications may improve asthma outcomes, the effectiveness of these interventions in diverse pediatric populations remains unclear. METHODS: Caregiver and child dyads were randomly assigned to receive inhaler sensors that allowed for caregiver and clinician electronic monitoring of medications. End points included Asthma Control Test scores (≥19 indicated asthma control) and asthma health care use. Caregiver quality of life (QoL) and child ICS adherence were also assessed. Multilevel models were used to estimate adjusted changes from baseline. RESULTS: Dyads were assigned to the control (n = 127) or intervention (n = 125) arms. At the end line, the mean Asthma Control Test score increased from 19.1 (SE = 0.3) to 21.8 (SE = 0.4) among the intervention and from 19.4 (SE = 0.3) to 19.9 (SE = 0.4) among the control (Δintervention-control = 2.2; SE = 0.6; P < .01). Adjusted rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations among the intervention were significantly greater (incidence rate ratioemergency department = 2.2; SE = 0.5; P < .01; incidence rate ratiohospital = 3.4; SE = 1.4; P < .01) at endline than the control. Caregiver QoL was greater among the intervention at the endline (Δintervention-control = 0.3; SE = 0.2; P = .1) than the control. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that sensor-based inhaler monitoring with clinical feedback may improve asthma control and caregiver QoL within diverse populations. Higher health care use was observed among the intervention participants relative to the control, indicating further refinement is warranted.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Adesão à Medicação , Telemetria , Adolescente , Cuidadores/psicologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Qualidade de Vida , SmartphoneRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The experiences of Black children with food allergy (FA) are not well characterized, particularly with respect to bullying victimization and other psychosocial outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate bullying experiences of Black and White children with FA, including associations with peer relationships, anxiety, and school policies. METHODS: Surveys were administered to parents of 252 children with physician-diagnosed FA enrolled in the multisite FORWARD cohort. The surveys assessed demographics, atopic disease, bullying victimization, and school FA management practices and policies. Descriptive statistics of bullying by race were compared by χ2 tests. Multiple logistic regression analyses adjusting for race, age, parental education, household income, child sex, and multi-FA compared adjusted probabilities of bullying victimization by school policies. RESULTS: Nearly 20% of school-aged children were bullied for FA with no substantial racial differences overall, though for children ages 11 years and up, White children reported higher rates of bullying. However, Black children experienced non-FA-related bullying twice as frequently as White children (38.6% vs 17.7%; P = .002). Most of the caregivers (85.7%) who intervened in their child's bullying reported that it was helpful. Among parents, 17.3% reported that they were teased or bullied owing to their child's FA. More than half of the respondents (54.8%) reported that some allergens are banned from their child's school, most typically peanut. In schools banning peanuts, FA-related bullying was less frequently reported by all students who have food allergy. CONCLUSION: Bullying owing to FA is common, and caregivers, medical professionals, and school administrators can help reduce bullying by screening for bullying and supporting and educating school policies.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Bullying/psicologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/terapia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Instituições Acadêmicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite major differences in health profiles and rates of health care utilization between African American and White children with food allergy (FA), the detailed phenotypic variables that can potentially impact these outcomes have not been thoroughly studied. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize phenotypic differences such as allergies to different foods and allergic comorbidities between African American and White children with FA enrolled in the Food Allergy Outcomes Related to White and African American Racial Differences study. METHODS: Our active, prospective, multicenter cohort study is currently enrolling African American and White children aged 0 to 12 years diagnosed with FA and followed by allergy/immunology clinics at 4 urban tertiary centers in the United States. To evaluate associations between race and phenotypic variables, we used multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for important demographic and confounding factors, as well as potential household clustering. RESULTS: As of May 2020, there were 239 African Americans and 425 Whites with complete intake information enrolled in the study. In comparison with Whites, we found that African Americans had significantly higher adjusted odds of allergy to finfish (odds ratio [OR]: 2.54, P < .01) and shellfish (OR: 3.10, P < .001). African Americans also had higher adjusted odds of asthma than Whites (asthma prevalence of 60.5% in African Americans and 27.2% in Whites; OR: 2.70, P < .001). In addition, shellfish allergy was associated with asthma, after controlling for race. CONCLUSION: Among a diverse cohort of children with physician-diagnosed FA, we observed that African American children had higher odds of allergy to shellfish and finfish, and higher rates of asthma. Interestingly, having asthma was independently associated with allergy to shellfish, after controlling for race.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Frutos do Mar , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy were published with recommendations on early introduction of peanut-containing foods based on infants' clinical history. OBJECTIVE: We sought to conduct a nationwide US survey to assess Guidelines implementation among allergists and immunologists who manage infants for food allergy. METHODS: Survey invitations were delivered to 3281 nonretired, US members of the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology, board certified in allergy and immunology. The survey assessed awareness and implementation of the Guidelines and barriers to implementation. Descriptive statistics were generated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent (946 of 3281) of surveyed allergists/immunologists responded, and 87.1% (825 of 946) of responders met eligibility criteria. Among eligible responders, 97.1% were aware of the Guidelines. Of these, 64.5% reported full implementation of the Guidelines as published, 34.4% reported partial implementation, and 1.1% reported using none of the Guidelines. Barriers to Guidelines use included parental (47.6%) and self (21.8%) concerns about allergic reactions, lack of referrals (33.6%), parents uninterested in early feeding (28.2%), and lack of clinic time (20.9%). The 2 most common deviations from the Guidelines were considering additional factors not specified in the Guidelines such as family history (50.2%) and conducting skin prick testing in non-high-risk children (43.9%). Of respondents using the Guidelines, 45.7% indicated they needed more education or training. CONCLUSIONS: Essentially all allergists/immunologists who responded to the survey reported full or partial Guidelines implementation. Parental concerns and lack of referrals are major identifiable barriers. Improved Guidelines messaging to parents and referring physicians is warranted.
Assuntos
Alergistas , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Amendoim/prevenção & controle , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Pessoal de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Importance: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend waiting 3 to 5 days between the introduction of new complementary foods (solid foods introduced to infants <12 months of age), yet with advances in the understanding of infant food diversity, the guidance that pediatric practitioners are providing to parents is unclear. Objective: To characterize pediatric practitioner recommendations regarding complementary food introduction and waiting periods between introducing new foods. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this survey study, a 23-item electronic survey on complementary food introduction among infants was administered to pediatric health care professionals from February 1 to April 30, 2019. Responses were described among the total sample and compared among subgroups. Survey invitations were emailed to 2215 members of the Illinois Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the national American Academy of Pediatrics' Council on Early Childhood. Participants were required to be primary medical practitioners, such as physicians, resident physicians, or nurse practitioners, providing pediatric care to infants 12 months or younger. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome measures were recommendations on age of complementary food introduction and waiting periods between the introduction of new foods. Categorical survey items were reported as numbers (percentages) and 95% CIs. Means (SDs) were used to describe continuous survey items. Results: The survey was sent to 2215 practitioners and completed by 604 (response rate, 27.3%). Of these respondents, 41 were excluded because they did not provide care for infants or pediatric patients. The final analyses included responses from 563 surveys. Of these, 454 pediatricians (80.6%), 85 resident physicians (15.1%), and 20 nurse practitioners (3.6%) completed the survey. Only 217 practitioners (38.6%; 95% CI, 34.1%-44.6%) recommended waiting 3 days or longer between food introduction; 259 practitioners (66.3%; 95% CI, 61.4%-70.8%) recommended waiting that amount of time for infants at risk for food allergy development (P = .02). A total of 264 practitioners (46.9%; 95% CI, 42.8%-51.0%) recommended infant cereal as the first food, and 226 practitioners (40.1%; 95% CI, 36.1%-44.2%) did not recommend a specific order. A total of 268 practitioners (47.6%; 95% CI, 43.5%-51.7%) recommended food introduction at 6 months for exclusively breastfed (EBF) infants, and 193 (34.3%; 95% CI, 30.5%-38.3%) recommended food introduction at 6 months for non-EBF infants (P < .001); 179 practitioners (31.8%; 95% CI, 28.1%-35.8%) recommended food introduction at 4 months for EBF infants, and 239 practitioners (42.5%; 95% CI, 38.4%-46.6%) recommended food introduction at 4 months for non-EBF infants (P < .001). A need for additional training on complementary food introduction was reported by 310 practitioners (55.1%; 95% CI, 50.9%-59.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, most pediatric practitioners did not counsel families to wait 3 days or longer between introducing foods unless infants were at risk for food allergy development. The findings suggest that the current recommendation limits infant food diversity and may delay early peanut introduction. Because the approach to food allergy prevention has changed, a reevaluation of published feeding guidelines may be necessary.
Assuntos
Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente/fisiologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pediatras/educação , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
Importance: The 2017 Addendum Guidelines for the Prevention of Peanut Allergy in the United States recommend that pediatricians assess infant peanut allergy risk and introduce peanut in the diet at age 4 to 6 months. Early introduction has the potential to prevent peanut allergy development. Objectives: To measure the rates of guideline awareness and implementation and to identify barriers to and factors associated with implementation among US pediatricians. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based study survey used a 29-item electronic survey instrument that was administered to pediatricians practicing across the United States from June 1, 2018, to December 1, 2018. Invitations to complete a survey were emailed to all pediatricians in the American Academy of Pediatrics vendor database. Eligible participants were nonretired US-based pediatricians providing general care to infants aged 12 months or younger. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the prevalence of guideline implementation, which was measured by 1 survey item about awareness followed by a second item about implementation. Secondary outcomes included identification of guidelines-focused services provided by pediatricians, knowledge of the guidelines (measured with 3 clinical scenarios), barriers to guideline implementation, need for training, and facilitators of guideline implementation. Results: A total of 1781 pediatricians were eligible to participate and completed the entire survey. Most respondents self-identified as white (1287 [72.5%]) and female (1210 [67.4%]) individuals. Overall, 1725 (93.4%; 95% CI, 92.2%-94.5%) pediatricians reported being aware of the guidelines. Of those pediatricians who had knowledge of the guidelines, 497 (28.9%; 95% CI, 26.8%-31.1%) reported full implementation and 1105 (64.3%; 95% CI, 62.0%-66.6%) reported partial implementation. Common barriers to implementation included parental concerns about allergic reactions (reported by 575 respondents [36.6%; 95% CI, 34.3%-39.1%]), uncertainty in understanding and correctly applying the guidelines (reported by 521 respondents [33.2%; 95% CI, 30.9%-35.6%]), and conducting in-office supervised feedings (reported by 509 respondents [32.4%; 95% CI, 30.1%-34.8%]). Many pediatricians (1175 [68.4%; 95% CI, 66.1%-70.5%]) reported a need for further training on the guidelines. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey found that most pediatrician respondents appeared to know of the 2017 guidelines, but less than one-third of respondents reported full implementation. Results of this study may inform future efforts to eliminate barriers to guideline implementation and adherence, thereby reducing the incidence of peanut allergy in infants.