Single Session Intermittent Heat Exposure With More Frequent and Shorter Cooling Breaks Facilitates Greater Training Intensity and Elicits Physiological Responses Comparable to Continuous Heat Exposure.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of shorter, more frequent rest breaks with per-cooling as an alternative heat-acclimation session on physiological, perceptual, and self-paced maximal cycling performance, compared with continuous heat exposure. METHODS: Thirteen participants completed 1 continuous and 3 intermittent-heat-exposure (IHE) maximal self-paced cycling protocols in a random order in heat (36 °C, 80% relative humidity): 1 × 60-minute exercise (CON), 3 × 20-minute exercise with 7.5-minute rest between sets (IHE-20), 4 × 15-minute exercise with 5-minute rest between sets (IHE-15), and 6 × 10-minute exercise with 3-minute rest between sets (IHE-10). Mixed-method per-cooling (crushed-ice ingestion and cooling vest) was applied during rest periods of all IHE protocols. RESULTS: Total distance completed was greater in IHE-10, IHE-15, and IHE-20 than in CON (+11%, +9%, and +8%, respectively), with no difference observed between IHE protocols. Total time spent above 38.5 °C core temperature was longer in CON compared with IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+62% and +78%, respectively) but similar to IHE-10 (+5%). Furthermore, a longer time above 38.5 °C core temperature occurred in IHE-10 versus IHE-15 and IHE-20 (+54% and +69%, respectively). Sweat loss did not differ between conditions. CONCLUSION: IHE with per-cooling may be a viable alternative heat-acclimation protocol in situations where training quality takes precedence over thermal stimulus or when both factors hold equal priority.

Vascular adaptation to exercise: a systematic review and audit of female representation.

Biological sex is a salient factor in exercise-induced vascular adaptation. Although a male bias is apparent in the literature, the methodological quality of available studies in females is not yet known. This systematic review with narrative synthesis aimed to assess available evidence of exercise interventions on endothelial function, measured using flow-mediated dilation, in otherwise healthy individuals and athletes. A standardized audit framework was applied to quantify the representation of female participants. Using a tiered grading system, studies that met best-practice recommendations for conducting physiological research in females were identified. A total of 210 studies in 5,997 participants were included, with 18% classified as athletes. The primary exercise mode and duration were aerobic (49%) and acute (61%), respectively. Despite 53% of studies (n = 111) including at least one female, female participants accounted for only 39% of the total study population but 49% of the athlete population. Majority (49%) of studies in females were conducted in premenopausal participants. No studies in naturally menstruating, hormonal contraceptive-users or in participants experiencing menstrual irregularities met all best-practice recommendations. Very few studies (∼5%) achieved best-practice methodological guidelines for studying females and those that did were limited to menopause and pregnant cohorts. In addition to the underrepresentation of female participants in exercise-induced vascular adaptation research, there remains insufficient high-quality evidence with acceptable methodological control of ovarian hormones. To improve the overall methodological quality of evidence, adequate detail regarding menstrual status should be prioritized when including females in vascular and exercise research contexts.

Mixed-Method Precooling Enhances Self-Paced 20-km Cycling Time-Trial Performance When Apparent Temperature Is >46 °C but May Not Be a Priority in <46 °C.

PURPOSE: Precooling (PreC) may only benefit performance when thermal strain experienced by an individual is sufficiently high. We explored the effect of mixed-method PreC on 20-km cycling time-trial (CTT) performance under 3 different apparent temperatures (AT). METHODS: On separate days, 12 trained or highly trained male cyclists/triathletes completed six 20-km CTTs in 3 different ATs: hot-dry (35 °C AT), moderately hot-humid (40 °C AT), and hot-humid (46 °C AT). All trials were preceded by 30 minutes of mixed-method PreC or no PreC (control [CON]). RESULTS: Faster 2.5-km-split completion times occurred in PreC compared with CON in 46 °C AT (P = .02), but not in 40 °C AT (P = .62) or 35 °C AT (P = .57). PreC did not affect rectal and body temperature during the 20-km CTT. Skin temperature was lower throughout the CTT in PreC compared with CON in 46 °C AT (P = .01), but not in 40 °C AT (P = 1.00) and 35 °C AT (P = 1.00). Heart rate had a greater rate of increase during the CTT for PreC compared with CON in 46 °C AT (P = .01), but not in 40 °C AT (P = .57) and 35 °C AT (P = 1.00). Ratings of perceived exertion (P < .001) and thermal comfort (P = .04) were lower for PreC compared with CON in 46 °C AT only, while thermal sensation was not different between PreC and CON. CONCLUSION: Mixed-method PreC should be applied prior to 20-km CTTs conducted in hot-humid conditions (≥46 °C AT). Alternatively, mixed-method PreC may be a priority in moderately hot-humid (∼40 °C AT) conditions but should not be in hot-dry (∼35 °C AT) conditions for 20-km CTT.

Hip adduction and abduction strength and adduction-to-abduction ratio changes across an Australian Football League season.

OBJECTIVES: Pre-season hip strength testing only represents the athlete's level of conditioning at that time point, and may change over an Australian Football (AF) season. This study aimed to examine if there are changes in hip adduction, abduction and the adduction-to-abduction ratio between preferred and non-preferred kicking legs throughout an AF season. The influence of training load and player characteristics was also examined. DESIGN: Cross-sectional repeated measures. METHODS: 38 uninjured elite AF players were included. Maximal isometric hip adduction and abduction strength were measured at four time points: start of pre-season (T1), end of pre-season (T2), mid-season (T3) and post-season (T4) using a hand held dynamometer with external belt fixation. RESULTS: Hip adduction strength and hip-adduction-to-abduction ratio were greater in T3 compared to T1 (adduction by 22.71N, p<0.001, ratio by 0.15N, p<0.001) and hip adduction and abduction were weaker in T4 compared to T1 (adduction by 18.6N, p=0.004, abduction by 24.67N, p<0.001). No differences were found between the preferred and non-preferred leg in adduction (p=0.409) or abduction (p=0.602) strength. There was an interaction between leg and time point for the adduction-to-abduction ratio; at T3 and T4, the ratio of the preferred kicking leg was significantly lower than the non-preferred kicking leg (T3 by 0.14N, p=0.020, T4 by 0.15N, p=0.019). Training load was not significantly associated with strength changes. CONCLUSIONS: Hip strength does change over an AF season. Regular in-season hip strength testing should occur to more accurately reflect player condition compared to one pre-season measurement.

Effect of pre-cooling on repeat-sprint performance in seasonally acclimatised males during an outdoor simulated team-sport protocol in warm conditions.

Whether precooling is beneficial for exercise performance in warm climates when heat acclimatised is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of precooling on repeat-sprint performance during a simulated team-sport circuit performed outdoors in warm, dry field conditions in seasonally acclimatised males (n = 10). They performed two trials, one with precooling (PC; ice slushy and cooling jacket) and another without (CONT). Trials began with a 30-min baseline/cooling period followed by an 80 min repeat-sprint protocol, comprising 4 x 20-min quarters, with 2 x 5-min quarter breaks and a 10-min half-time recovery/cooling period. A clear and substantial (negative; PC slower) effect was recorded for first quarter circuit time. Clear and trivial effects were recorded for overall circuit time, third and fourth quarter sprint times and fourth quarter best sprint time, otherwise unclear and trivial effects were recorded for remaining performance variables. Core temperature was moderately lower (Cohen's d=0.67; 90% CL=-1.27, 0.23) in PC at the end of the precooling period and quarter 1. No differences were found for mean skin temperature, heart rate, thermal sensation, or rating of perceived exertion, however, moderate Cohen's d effect sizes suggested a greater sweat loss in PC compared with CONT. In conclusion, repeat- sprint performance was neither clearly nor substantially improved in seasonally acclimatised players by using a combination of internal and external cooling methods prior to and during exercise performed in the field in warm, dry conditions. Of practical importance, precooling appears unnecessary for repeat-sprint performance if athletes are seasonally acclimatised or artificially acclimated to heat, as it provides no additional benefit. Key PointsPre-cooling did not improve repeated sprint performance during a prolonged team-sport circuit in field conditions.If individuals are already heat acclimatised/acclimated, pre-cooling is unnecessary for performance enhancement.Acclimation/acclimatisation seems to be the more powerful method for protecting against heat strain.