Serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: dose optimization from a laboratory classroom study.

Objective: To evaluate treatment responder rate using the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-5 (ADHD-RS-5) score based on optimized dose level of serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate (SDX/d-MPH) and changes in ADHD severity in children (aged 6-12 years) with ADHD. Methods: During a 21-day dose-optimization phase, 155 patients initiated treatment with 39.2/7.8 mg SDX/d-MPH in the first week and then were titrated to an optimum dose; 5 patients were downtitrated to 26.1/5.2 mg, 76 were uptitrated to 52.3/10.4 mg, and 69 remained at 39.2/7.8 mg during the following 2 weeks. Responder threshold values were 30% and 50% based on the percent change from baseline (day 0) to days 7, 14, and 21 in the ADHD-RS-5 score. The Conners 3rd Edition-Parent score was used to assess weekly changes in ADHD severity during the dose-optimization and treatment phases. Results: Of the 5 subjects whose dose was optimized at 26.1/5.2 mg, ≥80% across all days had ≥50% responder rate. Of the 69 subjects whose dose was optimized at 39.2/7.8 mg, 81.2% had ≥50% responder rate by day 21. Of the 76 subjects whose dose was optimized to 52.3/10.4 mg, 72.4% had ≥50% responder rate by day 21. Changes in ADHD severity, based on mean Conners 3rd Edition-Parent scores, improved from baseline at each visit during dose optimization for each subscale. At the dose-optimization phase, Conners 3rd Edition-Parent scores improved from baseline for SDX/d-MPH in all subscales. Conclusion: A high percentage of subjects were responders upon reaching their final optimized dose. SDX/d-MPH demonstrated significant reductions in ADHD severity in children based on the Conners 3rd Edition-Parent scores. Determining the optimal dosage of SDX/d-MPH and its effect on ADHD severity could enable the development of a more clinically relevant treatment regimen in children with ADHD.

A study of once-a-week donepezil transdermal system's bioequivalence to oral donepezil in healthy volunteers: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of an article published in the Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. It describes an adhesive patch placed on the skin's surface, also referred to as a transdermal delivery system (or TDS), that delivers donepezil (called donepezil TDS going forward) through the skin of patients with mild, moderate, and severe dementia of the Alzheimer's type. This summary focuses on how fast and how much of the medication donepezil enters the body through the skin, and how it compares with taking a pill form of donepezil by mouth (oral donepezil). This summary also looks at how much donepezil is circulating through the body with the use of the once-a-week donepezil TDS versus the once-a-day donepezil pill. We show that the same amount of donepezil circulates through the body when donepezil TDS is used once a week as when a participant takes an oral donepezil pill once a day. WHY IS THIS STUDY IMPORTANT?: Dementia is a term used to describe a person's decreasing ability to remember, think, or make decisions necessary to successfully complete daily activities. Alzheimer's disease is a disorder that progresses slowly, with the symptoms of dementia getting worse over many years. When viewed under a microscope, the visible features of Alzheimer's disease within the brain are protein deposits called plaques between brain cells and protein strands within brain cells that appear as tangles. One of the many features that cannot be seen with the naked eye in the Alzheimer's brain is the low level of a chemical called acetylcholine that allows certain nerve cells in the brain involved with memory to communicate with one another. Donepezil, a drug that is widely used to treat dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease, increases the amount of acetylcholine in the brain. Donepezil is usually in pill form and taken by mouth. However, one problem with taking oral donepezil is that it can cause stomach or intestinal side effects like diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. These side effects may be bad enough that people stop taking their medication. In 2022, for the first time, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved a donepezil TDS marketed under the name Adlarity. Donepezil TDS is for use in patients who have mild, moderate, and severe dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease. It is applied once a week to skin on the patient's back, upper buttocks, or thigh. Donepezil TDS allows the drug donepezil to be absorbed into the body directly through the skin, which means that the drug does not go through the digestive system. This means that many stomach and intestinal side effects (the undesirable effects of the drug) can potentially be reduced. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In healthy volunteers, we showed that donepezil TDS allows a similar amount of the drug into the body as the oral donepezil pill. This is done using a type of examination known as pharmacokinetics (how much, how fast, and how steadily donepezil is taken into the bloodstream). In healthy participants, donepezil TDS had overall fewer stomach and intestinal side effects (like constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting) than the oral donepezil pill, although more participants reported abdominal pain with donepezil TDS than with oral donepezil. Donepezil TDS also had fewer instances of nervous system side effects (like dizziness and sleepiness) than the oral donepezil pill. These findings support using donepezil TDS to treat patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Comparison of Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Donepezil Transdermal Delivery System with Oral Donepezil.

BACKGROUND: Donepezil is approved for treatment of dementia of the Alzheimer type and is currently available only in tablet forms in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To compare steady-state pharmacokinetics of once-weekly 10-mg/d and 5-mg/d Corplex™ donepezil transdermal delivery systems (TDS) with once-daily 10-mg oral donepezil. METHODS: Open-label, randomized, crossover study (NCT04617782) enrolled healthy participants aged 18-55 years. All participants received 5-mg/d donepezil TDS during the 5-week Period 1, followed by 10-mg/d TDS or 10-mg/d oral donepezil in the 5-week Period 2; treatments were switched in Period 3. Bioequivalence was assessed at steady state on Week 5. RESULTS: All 60 enrolled participants received 5-mg/d TDS, 55 received 10-mg/d TDS, and 56 received oral donepezil. Adjusted geometric mean ratio (% [90% CI]) for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (0-168 h) were 88.7 (81.7-96.2) and 108.6 (100.5-117.4) for 10-mg/d and 86.1 (79.8-92.9) and 105.3 (97.6-113.6) for dose-normalized 5-mg/d TDS and were generally within the 80% -125% range for establishing bioequivalence with oral donepezil. Skin adhesion was similar for both TDSs (>80% of patches remaining ≥75% adhered throughout the wear period). Overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was similar across treatments. Compared with 10-mg/d TDS, oral donepezil was associated with higher incidence of gastrointestinal and nervous system AEs (14.5% versus 53.6% and 14.5% versus 30.4%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Donepezil TDSs are bioequivalent to oral donepezil at steady state and have a safety profile that supports their use in treating dementia of the Alzheimer type.

Dose Proportionality and Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Serdexmethylphenidate/Dexmethylphenidate, a Novel Prodrug Combination to Treat Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: The study was designed to determine (1) the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH) after oral administration of three dosage strengths of a new treatment containing d-MPH and a novel prodrug, serdexmethylphenidate (SDX); (2) the dose proportionality of the different SDX/d-MPH dosages; and (3) the steady-state PK profile of d-MPH and SDX after multiple dosing of SDX/d-MPH. Methods: Twenty-three healthy volunteers (aged 18-55 years) under fasted conditions received in a crossover design SDX/d-MPH 26.1/5.2 mg (Treatment A), 39.2/7.8 mg (Treatment B), and 52.3/10.4 mg (Treatment C) for a total d-MPH hydrochloride equivalent dose of 20, 30, and 40 mg, respectively. After a 96-hour washout period, all participants received four consecutive daily doses of SDX/d-MPH 52.3/10.4 mg. Blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma d-MPH and SDX and for PK analysis. Results: Administration of all three doses of SDX/d-MPH resulted in a rapid rise and slow decline in the plasma concentration of d-MPH. For Treatments A, B, and C, mean (± standard deviation) maximum concentrations (Cmax) were 7.1 ± 2.1, 9.8 ± 2.8, and 13.8 ± 3.8 ng/mL, and overall exposures (AUC0-last) were 97.2 ± 28.8, 142.5 ± 41.2, and 199.8 ± 57.2 h*ng/mL, respectively. Dose-normalized Cmax, AUC0-last, and AUC0-inf for d-MPH were similar when comparing the high and low doses versus the middle dose. Power model regression analysis revealed that Cmax and AUC0-inf proportionally increased with an increase in SDX/d-MPH dose. In the multiple-dose study, d-MPH reached steady state before the third dose, and SDX after the first dose. Conclusion: The PK profile of SDX/d-MPH is characterized by a rapid rise and a gradual decline in d-MPH concentration, with proportional Cmax and AUC0-inf across doses. The PK attributes of SDX/d-MPH may optimize symptom control from early morning to early evening, while the demonstrated dose proportionality may facilitate initial dose titration and ongoing dose adjustment.

Oral, intranasal, and intravenous abuse potential of serdexmethylphenidate, a novel prodrug of d-methylphenidate.

OBJECTIVES: Serdexmethylphenidate (SDX) chloride (Cl) is a novel prodrug of d-methylphenidate (d-MPH). These studies evaluated the abuse potential of SDX Cl when administered orally, intranasally (IN), and intravenously (IV). METHODS: Three randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies were conducted in recreational drug users to evaluate the abuse-related effects of oral SDX (120 and 240 mg) vs. extended-release (ER) d-MPH (80 mg) and phentermine (60 mg); IN SDX (80 mg) vs. d-MPH (40 mg), and IV SDX (30 mg) vs. d-MPH (15 mg). Abuse-related subjective measures, pharmacokinetics, and safety were assessed. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of maximum (Emax) Drug Liking (DL) (0-100-point scale) was significantly higher following d-MPH vs. placebo, validating the studies. In the oral study, DL Emax was significantly higher following 80 mg ER d-MPH (Emax = 81.5) than 120 mg SDX (Emax = 62.8, p < .001) and 240 mg SDX (Emax = 63.8, p = .006); and following 60 mg phentermine (Emax = 80.2) than 120 mg SDX (p = .0195), but not 240 mg SDX (p = .0665). DL Emax scores were significantly higher following IN d-MPH vs SDX (Emax = 93.2 vs. 71.0, p < .0001) and following IV d-MPH vs. SDX (Emax = 84.3 vs. 56.6, p = .001). Intravenous SDX was non-inferior to placebo (p = .001) for DL Emax. Secondary endpoints (e.g. Take Drug Again) were generally consistent with the primary endpoint. Maximal and overall d-MPH exposure was lower for SDX than d-MPH for all routes. Adverse events typical of stimulants were more frequent with d-MPH than SDX. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the novel d-MPH prodrug, SDX, has lower abuse potential than d-MPH and support its classification as a C-IV controlled substance.

A Randomized, Controlled Laboratory Classroom Study of Serdexmethylphenidate and d-Methylphenidate Capsules in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily serdexmethylphenidate/dexmethylphenidate (SDX/d-MPH) capsules (Azstarys™) compared with placebo in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a randomized, double-blind, dose-optimized laboratory classroom study. Methods: Children ages 6-12 with ADHD were enrolled. During a 3-week, open-label, Dose Optimization Phase, subjects initiated treatment with 39.2 mg/7.8 mg/day of SDX/d-MPH and were titrated weekly to an optimal dose (maximum dose of 52.3/10.4 mg). During the double-blind Treatment Phase, subjects were randomized to receive their optimal dose of SDX/d-MPH or placebo for 7 days. On day 7, efficacy was assessed in the laboratory classroom using the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale and Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP). To evaluate safety, adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and electrocardiograms were assessed, and suicide risk was assessed. Results: A total of 149 subjects completed the study. In the primary efficacy analysis, the mean postdose change from baseline in SKAMP-Combined scores averaged over the laboratory classroom day was significantly improved with SDX/d-MPH versus placebo (least-squares mean treatment difference [95% confidence interval]: -5.41 [-7.10 to -3.71]; p < 0.001). A significant treatment effect for SDX/d-MPH compared with placebo was observed from 1 to 10 hours postdose. A post hoc analysis more comparable with that conducted in similar studies indicated a 0.5- to 13-hour onset and duration of efficacy. Both average postdose PERMP-Attempted and PERMP-Correct score changes from baseline were significantly improved among those treated with SDX/d-MPH versus placebo (p < 0.001 for both). No serious AEs were reported. During the Dose Optimization Phase, two-thirds of subjects reported AEs; the most common being insomnia and decreased appetite. Conclusions: SDX/d-MPH showed significant improvement in ADHD symptoms compared with placebo in children 6-12 years of age, with a rapid onset and extended duration of treatment effect. SDX/d-MPH was safe, with AEs comparable with those observed with other stimulant treatments.

Pharmacokinetics and Abuse Potential of Asalhydromorphone, a Novel Prodrug of Hydromorphone, After Intranasal Administration in Recreational Drug Users.

OBJECTIVES: Hydromorphone (HM) is a potent µ-opioid receptor agonist with high susceptibility for abuse. A prodrug of hydromorphone, asalhydromorphone (ASAL-HM), has been designed to deter nonoral forms of abuse associated with hydromorphone. This study evaluated the intranasal (IN) pharmacokinetics and exploratory abuse potential of ASAL-HM compared with HM. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover study. SETTING: Clinical research site. SUBJECTS: Healthy adult, nondependent recreational opioid users. METHODS: Subjects (N = 26) were randomized to receive IN administration of 16.1 mg of ASAL-HM and 8.0 mg of HM (molar-equivalent with respect to hydromorphone). Blood samples were taken through 24 hours postdose, and pharmacodynamic end points (Drug Liking, Feeling High, Take Drug Again, Overall Drug Liking) were assessed through eight hours postdose. Nasal irritation and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Relative to IN HM, the rate (Cmax) and extent (area under the curve [AUC0-last, AUC0-inf]) of exposure to hydromorphone following IN ASAL-HM were reduced by ≥50%. Consistent with these findings, scores on "at-the-moment" (i.e., Drug Liking Emax, High Emax) and retrospective (i.e., Take Drug Again, Overall Drug Liking) end points were statistically significantly lower for IN ASAL-HM, with mean/median differences ranging from 11.4 to 25.0 points. ASAL-HM produced greater nasal-related effects, such as nasal burning and facial pain, and a lower incidence of typical opioid-related adverse events such as euphoria, pruritus, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The novel hydromorphone prodrug ASAL-HM produced marked reductions in hydromorphone exposure and abuse-related effects following IN administration compared with HM. ASAL-HM has desirable molecular features for incorporation into putative abuse-deterrent immediate-release and extended-release hydromorphone products.

Rationale and design of REDUCE-IT: Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial.

Residual cardiovascular risk persists despite statins, yet outcome studies of lipid-targeted therapies beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) have not demonstrated added benefit. Triglyceride elevation is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. High-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) reduces triglyceride-rich lipoproteins without raising LDL-C. Omega-3s have postulated pleiotropic cardioprotective benefits beyond triglyceride-lowering. To date, no large, multinational, randomized clinical trial has proved that lowering triglycerides on top of statin therapy improves cardiovascular outcomes. The Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT; NCT01492361) is a phase 3b randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of icosapent ethyl, a highly purified ethyl ester of EPA, vs placebo. The main objective is to evaluate whether treatment with icosapent ethyl reduces ischemic events in statin-treated patients with high triglycerides at elevated cardiovascular risk. REDUCE-IT enrolled men or women age ≥45 years with established cardiovascular disease or age ≥50 years with diabetes mellitus and 1 additional risk factor. Randomization required fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL and <500 mg/dL and LDL-C >40 mg/dL and ≤100 mg/dL with stable statin (± ezetimibe) ≥4 weeks prior to qualifying measurements. The primary endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina. The key secondary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Several secondary, tertiary, and exploratory endpoints will be assessed. Approximately 8000 patients have been randomized at approximately 470 centers worldwide. Follow-up will continue in this event-driven trial until approximately 1612 adjudicated primary-efficacy endpoint events have occurred.

Icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester): Effects on remnant-like particle cholesterol from the MARINE and ANCHOR studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C) is atherogenic and may increase atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Icosapent ethyl is a high-purity prescription eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester (approved as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride [TG] levels in adult patients with TGs ≥500 mg/dL [≥5.65 mmol/L] at 4 g/day). In the MARINE and ANCHOR studies, icosapent ethyl reduced TG and other atherogenic lipid parameter levels without increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. This exploratory analysis evaluated the effects of icosapent ethyl on calculated and directly measured RLP-C. METHODS: MARINE (TGs ≥500 and ≤2000 mg/dL [≥5.65 mmol/L and ≤22.6 mmol/L]) and ANCHOR (TGs ≥200 and <500 mg/dL [≥2.26 and <5.65 mmol/L] despite statin-controlled LDL-C) were phase 3, 12-week, double-blind studies that randomized adult patients to icosapent ethyl 4 g/day, 2 g/day, or placebo. This analysis assessed median percent change from baseline to study end in directly measured (immunoseparation assay) RLP-C levels (MARINE, n = 218; ANCHOR, n = 252) and calculated RLP-C levels in the full populations. RESULTS: Icosapent ethyl 4 g/day significantly reduced directly measured RLP-C levels -29.8% (p = 0.004) in MARINE and -25.8% (p = 0.0001) in ANCHOR versus placebo, and also reduced directly measured RLP-C levels to a greater extent in subgroups with higher versus lower baseline TG levels, in patients receiving statins versus no statins (MARINE), and in patients receiving medium/higher-intensity versus lower-intensity statins (ANCHOR). Strong correlations were found between calculated and directly measured RLP-C for baseline, end-of-treatment, and percent change values in ANCHOR and MARINE (0.73-0.92; p < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Icosapent ethyl 4 g/day significantly reduced calculated and directly measured RLP-C levels versus placebo in patients with elevated TG levels from the MARINE and ANCHOR studies.

Icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester): Effects on plasma apolipoprotein C-III levels in patients from the MARINE and ANCHOR studies.

BACKGROUND: Apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III) regulates lipoprotein and triglyceride (TG) metabolism and may have a causal role in cardiovascular disease. In the Multi-Center, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, 12-Week Study With an Open-Label Extension (MARINE) and ANCHOR studies, icosapent ethyl, a high-purity prescription eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester, reduced TG, and other atherogenic lipid parameters without increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) compared with placebo. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of icosapent ethyl on plasma ApoC-III levels in patients from 2 phase 3 studies. METHODS: MARINE and ANCHOR were 12-week double-blind studies of icosapent ethyl in adult patients. Patients in MARINE had very high TG levels (≥500 and ≤2000 mg/dL) and patients in ANCHOR had high TG levels (≥200 and <500 mg/dL) despite statin control of LDL-C. This post hoc analysis of MARINE and ANCHOR assessed the median percent change from baseline in plasma ApoC-III levels vs placebo and includes subgroup analyses by statin use/efficacy and median ApoC-III levels. RESULTS: We assessed ApoC-III levels in 148 and 612 patients in the MARINE and ANCHOR studies, respectively. In MARINE, the approved prescription dose of icosapent ethyl (4 g/day) significantly reduced ApoC-III levels by 25.1% (P < .0001) vs placebo. In ANCHOR, icosapent ethyl 4 g/day significantly reduced ApoC-III levels by 19.2% (P < .0001) vs placebo; subanalysis by statin efficacy revealed significant reductions vs placebo in the higher-efficacy and medium-efficacy groups (24.6% and 17.2%, respectively; both P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Icosapent ethyl 4 g/day significantly reduced plasma ApoC-III levels in patients with elevated TGs from the MARINE and ANCHOR studies.

Effects of Icosapent Ethyl (Eicosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester) on Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Rosiglitazone in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Icosapent ethyl is a high-purity form of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester approved to reduce triglyceride levels in adults with triglycerides ≥500 mg/dL. Candidates for triglyceride-lowering therapy include patients with diabetes mellitus who may be receiving rosiglitazone. We assessed the effects of icosapent ethyl on the pharmacokinetic parameters of rosiglitazone. METHODS: Subjects received a single 8-mg oral dose of rosiglitazone alone and with oral icosapent ethyl 4 g/day in this open-label drug-drug interaction study. Pharmacokinetic end points included area under the concentration versus time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax) for rosiglitazone with and without icosapent ethyl. RESULTS: Of 30 subjects enrolled, 28 completed the study. Icosapent ethyl 4 g/day at steady-state did not significantly change the single-dose AUC0-inf or Cmax of rosiglitazone 8 mg. Least squares geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for AUC0-inf and Cmax of rosiglitazone given with icosapent ethyl versus rosiglitazone alone were 0.90 (87.00-93.40) and 1.01 (92.02-109.9), respectively. No serious adverse events were reported and no subject discontinued due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: At steady-state concentrations, icosapent ethyl did not inhibit the pharmacokinetics of rosiglitazone. Co-administration of icosapent ethyl and rosiglitazone was safe and well tolerated.

Effects of icosapent ethyl on lipoprotein particle concentration and size in statin-treated patients with persistent high triglycerides (the ANCHOR Study).

BACKGROUND: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester approved at a dose of 4 g/day as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels in adult patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG ≥ 500 mg/dL). OBJECTIVE: In this prespecified exploratory analysis from the ANCHOR study of patients at high cardiovascular risk with TG ≥ 200 and <500 mg/dL despite statin control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, we assessed the effects of IPE on lipoprotein particle concentration and size and examined correlations of atherogenic particles with apolipoprotein B (ApoB). METHODS: Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to measure lipoprotein particle concentration and size. RESULTS: Compared with placebo (n = 211), IPE 4 g/day (n = 216) significantly reduced concentrations of: total (12.2%, P = .0002), large (46.4%, P < .0001), and medium (12.1%, P = .0068) very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles; total (7.7%, P = .0017) and small (13.5%, P < .0001) LDL particles; and total (7.4%, P < .0001) and large (31.0%, P < .0001) high-density lipoprotein particles. Atherogenic lipoprotein particles (total VLDL and total LDL) correlated with ApoB at baseline (R(2) = 0.57) and week 12 (R(2) = 0.65) as did total LDL particle concentration at baseline (R(2) = 0.53) and week 12 (R(2) = 0.59). Compared with placebo, IPE 4 g/day significantly reduced VLDL (7.7%, P < .0001) and high-density lipoprotein (1.2%, P = .0014) particle sizes with a modest but significant increase in LDL particle size (0.5%, P = .0031). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, treatment with IPE 4 g/day for 12 weeks reduced key atherogenic lipoprotein particle concentrations. At both baseline and end of study, atherogenic lipoprotein concentrations correlated with ApoB.

Icosapent Ethyl (Eicosapentaenoic Acid Ethyl Ester): Effects Upon High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Lipid Parameters in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to examine the effects of icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester, IPE) on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and lipid parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome, with and without stable statin therapy. METHODS: This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients with metabolic syndrome treated with IPE 4 grams/day, IPE 2 grams/day, or placebo in phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled studies entitled: MARINE [triglyceride (TG) levels ≥500 and ≤2000 mg/dL] and ANCHOR [TG levels ≥200 and <500 mg/dL, despite low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control with stable statin therapy]. RESULTS: Compared with placebo in patients with metabolic syndrome in MARINE (n=204) and ANCHOR (n=645), at the approved dose of 4 grams/day, IPE significantly lowered hsCRP levels 40.0% (P=0.0007) in MARINE and 23.0% (P=0.0003) in ANCHOR. Compared with placebo in MARINE, which included patients with and without statin therapy, IPE 4 grams/day significantly reduced hsCRP levels 78.0% in statin-treated patients (P=0.0035, n=16). Compared with placebo in MARINE, IPE 4 grams/day significantly reduced TG levels (35.0%; P<0.0001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C; 19.9%; P<0.0001), and apolipoprotein B levels (ApoB) (9.1%; P=0.0015) without raising LDL-C levels. Compared with placebo in ANCHOR, IPE 4 grams/day significantly reduced TG (21.7%; P<0.0001), non-HDL-C (13.5%; P<0.0001), ApoB (8.8%; P<0.0001), LDL-C (5.2%; P=0.0236), and HDL-C levels (4.0%; P=0.0053). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, IPE 4 grams/day significantly lowered hsCRP levels and improved lipids without raising LDL-C levels in patients with metabolic syndrome and high (≥200 and <500 mg/dL) or very high (≥500 and ≤2000 mg/dL) TG levels, with or without stable statin therapy.

Effect of concomitant icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester) on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Icosapent ethyl is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester approved as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride levels in adult patients with triglyceride levels ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L). The objective of this open-label, drug-drug interaction study was to examine the effects of icosapent ethyl on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, a commonly prescribed medication in patients with dyslipidaemia. METHODS: Thirty healthy subjects received atorvastatin 80 mg/day on days 1-7, icosapent ethyl 4 g/day on days 8-28, and co-administration on days 29-35. Primary end-points were natural log-transformed maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) for atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, and 4-hydroxyatorvastatin with and without icosapent ethyl. RESULTS: Of the 30 subjects enrolled, 26 completed the study. The 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC(0-24) least-squares geometric mean ratios were within the 0.80-1.25 bounds. Concomitant administration of icosapent ethyl and atorvastatin was safe and well tolerated and icosapent ethyl did not significantly change the steady state C(max) and AUC(0-24) of atorvastatin, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin, or 4-hydroxyatorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: At steady-state concentrations, icosapent ethyl did not have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin. Co-administration of icosapent ethyl and atorvastatin was safe and well tolerated in healthy adult subjects.

Effect of icosapent ethyl (eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester) on omeprazole plasma pharmacokinetics in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride levels in adult patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. Patients with high serum triglycerides may be taking concurrent medications for associated conditions such as obesity and/or diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of IPE on the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of omeprazole, a commonly used proton pump inhibitor and a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. STUDY DESIGN: Omeprazole (40 mg/day for 7 days) was administered orally without and with 4 g/day IPE at steady state. The primary PK endpoint was area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24); secondary endpoints included maximum observed plasma concentration (C max). Safety was monitored in all subjects who received one or more dose(s) of the study drug. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty healthy adult subjects were enrolled and 28 completed the study. RESULTS: IPE 4 g/day at steady state did not significantly change the AUC0-24 or C max of omeprazole when co-administered at 40 mg/day to steady state. The ratios of least squares geometric means (90 % confidence interval) for AUC0-24 and C max (omeprazole with IPE vs. omeprazole alone) were 0.84 (76.0-91.9) and 1.01 (87.4-116.3), respectively. There were no clinically significant findings from laboratory tests, vital signs, or physical examinations. CONCLUSIONS: At steady-state concentrations, IPE 4 g/day did not inhibit the AUC0-24 or C max of omeprazole 40 mg/day, a CYP2C19 substrate. Co-administration of IPE with omeprazole was safe and well tolerated.

Phase 1 study of the effect of icosapent ethyl on warfarin pharmacokinetic and anticoagulation parameters.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester approved to reduce triglyceride levels in patients with severe (≥5.65 mmol/L) hypertriglyceridemia. EPA, the active metabolite of IPE, is mainly metabolized via ß-oxidation, and studies suggest that omega-3 fatty acids such as EPA may have antithrombotic effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of IPE on the pharmacokinetic and anticoagulation pharmacodynamics of warfarin, a substrate of cytochrome P450 2C9-mediated metabolism. METHODS: Healthy adults received oral warfarin (25 mg) on day 1, oral IPE (4 g/day) on days 8-35, and co-administration on Day 29. Primary pharmacokinetic end points were area under the concentration-versus-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) for R- and S-warfarin; pharmacodynamic end points were area under the international normalized ratio (INR) effect-time curve after the warfarin dose (AUC(INR)) and maximum INR (INR(max)). RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects completed the study. AUC(0-∞) and C max ratios of geometric means for both R- and S-warfarin following co-administration of warfarin with versus without IPE were within the 90 % confidence intervals of 0.80-1.25. AUC(INR), INR(max), and ratios were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: IPE 4 g/day did not significantly change the single-dose AUC(0-∞) or C(max) of R- and S-warfarin or the anticoagulation pharmacodynamics of warfarin when co-administered as racemic warfarin at 25 mg. Co-administration of these drugs was safe and well tolerated in this study of healthy adult subjects.

Pharmacokinetics of Eicosapentaenoic Acid in Plasma and Red Blood Cells After Multiple Oral Dosing With Icosapent Ethyl in Healthy Subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester. This randomized, open-label study characterized EPA pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Four healthy subject groups received IPE for 28 days: three received 2 g/day (1 × 1,000 mg BID, 2 × 1,000 mg QD, or 2 × 500 mg BID); one received 4 g/day (2 × 1,000 mg BID) administered with meals. Blood sampling was before the morning dose on days 1, 14, 26, 28, and at specified intervals during an 18-day pharmacokinetic period. EPA was measured in plasma (total and unesterified) and red blood cells (RBCs) by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Mean plasma total EPA increased from 19 µg/mL to a peak (Cmax) of 366 µg/mL at 5 hours postdosing 4 g/day IPE on Day 28. Mean RBC EPA Cmax after 4 g/day was 89 µg/mL (baseline, 12 µg/mL). Mean steady state (SD) for half-life, clearance, and volume of distribution of total EPA were 79 (47) hours, 757 (283) mL/h, and 82 (56) L, respectively. Steady state for total and unesterified plasma EPA was reached by Day 28, whereas RBC levels were still increasing. CONCLUSIONS: EPA pharmacokinetic profile demonstrated a slowly cleared, extensively distributed molecule with dose linearity and comparable exposures with BID and QD regimens.

Icosapent ethyl, a pure EPA omega-3 fatty acid: effects on plasma and red blood cell fatty acids in patients with very high triglyceride levels (results from the MARINE study).

INTRODUCTION: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester. We evaluated IPE's effects on plasma and red blood cell (RBC) fatty acids (FA) and the relationship to triglyceride (TG) lowering. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a predefined, exploratory analysis (N=229) of FA plasma concentration and RBC membrane content from the double-blind, placebo-controlled MARINE study. RESULTS: Mean placebo-adjusted plasma EPA levels increased from baseline by 792% and 402% and the arachidonic acid/EPA plasma ratio decreased from baseline by 99% and 88% with IPE 4 g/day and 2 g/day, respectively (all P<.0001). Overall, the fractional pool of omega-3 FAs increased; there was a decrease or no change for omega-6 FAs. The increase in EPA levels with increased IPE dose corresponded with the TG-lowering effect. Similar FA shifts were observed in RBCs. CONCLUSIONS: IPE significantly increased plasma and RBC FAs, which correlated to TG lowering.

Effects of icosapent ethyl on lipid and inflammatory parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus-2, residual elevated triglycerides (200-500 mg/dL), and on statin therapy at LDL-C goal: the ANCHOR study.

BACKGROUND: Icosapent ethyl (IPE) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels in adult patients with severe (≥500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia. ANCHOR was a 12-week, phase 3 study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of IPE in patients (N = 702) with residual high fasting TG levels (≥200 and <500 mg/dL) despite having optimized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (≥40 and <100 mg/dL) on statin therapy. Among patients randomized to IPE (4 g/day or 2 g/day) or placebo, 514 (73%) had diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the ANCHOR study was conducted to assess the effects of IPE on median placebo-adjusted percent change from baseline in efficacy end point parameters in 3 subgroups: total (all subjects with diabetes-overall median baseline glycosylated hemoglobin A1c [A1c] = 6.8%), better-controlled diabetes (below median baseline A1c), and less-controlled diabetes (above median baseline A1c). RESULTS: Baseline efficacy parameters were similar among all groups except high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), which was higher in the total and less-controlled diabetes groups. Compared with placebo, IPE 4 g/day significantly reduced TG, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, VLDL-TG, oxidized LDL, and remnant-like particle cholesterol in all 3 diabetes groups, LDL-C in the total diabetes group, and hsCRP in the total and less-controlled diabetes groups. Decreases in hsCRP and Apo B were much greater in patients with less-controlled diabetes. There were no significant increases in fasting plasma glucose, A1c, insulin, or homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance in any group. CONCLUSION: IPE 4 g/day significantly improved lipid and lipid-related parameters without worsening glycemic control in patients with diabetes and mixed dyslipidemia, with possibly greater effects among those with less-controlled diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01047501.

Icosapent ethyl for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia.

INTRODUCTION: Icosapent ethyl (IPE; Vascepa) is a high-purity prescription form of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) ethyl ester recently approved in 2012 to reduce triglyceride (TG) levels in adult patients with severe (≥ 500 mg/dL) hypertriglyceridemia. Elevated TG levels are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease. Currently available TG-lowering agents (fibrates, niacins, omega-3 fatty acid products containing both EPA and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) may be associated with adverse effects such as flushing, hepatotoxicity, myopathy, elevated glucose levels, and/or increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). AREAS COVERED: This review describes IPE chemistry, pharmacokinetics, and clinical studies. In two Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials, one in patients with very high TG levels (≥ 500 mg/dL; MARINE) and the other in statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk with well-controlled LDL-C and residual high TG levels (≥ 200 to < 500 mg/dL; ANCHOR), IPE lowered levels of TG, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and other atherogenic lipoproteins without increasing LDL-C levels. EXPERT OPINION: IPE is safe and effective for managing high TG levels, and it offers a new alternative with potential benefits over currently available treatments for dyslipidemia. The ongoing cardiovascular outcomes REDUCE-IT trial will provide valuable information on the efficacy of IPE to prevent cardiovascular events in high-risk patients already taking statins.