Safety and Efficacy of Gabapentin for Pain in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Gabapentin has shown benefits for a variety of pain etiologies in adult patients, with off-label use as an adjunctive agent in pediatric patients occurring more frequently. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the studies which evaluate safety and efficacy of gabapentin for the treatment of pediatric pain. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the literature was conducted via PubMed query with controlled vocabulary and key terms using indexed medical subject heading. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2023, were selected utilizing a predetermined exclusion criteria independently by 2 authors, with a third independent author available for discrepancies. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was performed by 2 authors independently to include study design, patient population and characteristics, drug dosing, and outcomes. Studies were then assessed for their independent risk of bias utilizing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach to risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies describing 195 pediatric patients who received gabapentin were included. Of the 11 studies, 9 were randomized controlled trials, 1 was a prospective multicenter study, and 1 was an open-label pilot study. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneity of pain type and gabapentin dosing regimens within the included studies made conclusions difficult to quantify. Efficacy likely depends significantly on etiology of pain; however, per these studies, gabapentin is likely safe to use for a variety of pediatric patient populations as a multimodal agent.

Low- versus high-dose nitroglycerin infusion in the management of acute pulmonary edema.

BACKGROUND: Nitroglycerin (NTG) is commonly used for the management of pulmonary edema in acute heart failure presentations. Although commonly initiated at low infusion rates, higher infusion rates have favorable pharmacodynamic properties and may improve outcomes in the management of acute pulmonary edema. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the clinical outcomes including the time to resolution of severe hypertension when using an initial low dose (<100 µg/min) versus high-dose (≥100 µg/min) strategy. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at a single, tertiary academic emergency department in Atlanta, GA. We describe the blood pressure effects and key safety outcomes (intubation, hypotension, intensive care unit admissions) during the first hour of treatment of acute pulmonary edema. RESULTS: 41 patients were included in the final sample. 27 (66%) received low dose NTG and 14 (34%) received high dose NTG. The high dose group reached their blood pressure faster on average (hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.2-10.1). 8/14 (57%) of patients in the high dose group reached their BP target within the first hour of treatment, compared to 6/27 (22%) in the low dose group. Observed incidence of safety outcomes were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher initial NTG doses may be an effective way to decrease times to achieve blood pressure targets and should be the focus of future trials.