Real-world effectiveness and safety of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, for inflammatory bowel diseases: A prospective national observational cohort study (ReFLECT study).

BACKGROUND: ReFLECT was a French, prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the infliximab (IFX) biosimilar CT-P13 in a real-world setting. Here, we describe the results for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Eligible patients with IBD were recruited and received intravenous CT-P13 induction and/or maintenance therapy; patients were either naive to IFX (IFX-naive) or previously treated with IFX originator or another IFX biosimilar (IFX-switched). The primary objective was CT-P13 persistence, which was measured as a time-dependent variable during a two-year follow-up period with four prespecified visits. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: The adult IBD population comprised 530 patients with Crohn's disease (CD), including 327 categorized as IFX-naive, 188 as IFX-switched, 11 as other (i.e., previously received IFX but received another treatment before switching to CT-P13), and 4 with missing data; and 221 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), including 152 categorized as IFX-naive, 59 as IFX-switched, 8 as other, and 2 with missing data. After two years of follow-up, the rates of CT-P13 persistence were 71.7 % (95 % CI: 66.7, 77.0) and 63.7 % (55.3, 73.3) in patients with CD and UC, respectively. CT-P13 persistence was greater for IFX-switched patients than for IFX-naive patients (CD: 83.7 % [95 % CI: 78.0, 89.9] vs 65.7 % [58.6, 73.7]; UC: 91.2 % [81.7, 100.0] vs 53.4 % [43.0, 66.2]). The main reason for CT-P13 discontinuation was loss of response (CD/UC) in both IFX-naive (14.7 %/21.7 %) and IFX-switched (7.4 %/5.1 %) groups. Among patients (CD and UC, respectively), 51.3 % and 45.2 % reported ≥1 adverse event (AE), and 13.2 % and 12.7 % reported serious AEs, respectively. CONCLUSION: After two years of follow-up, the effectiveness of intravenous CT-P13 was maintained in >80 % of IFX-switched patients. CT-P13 induced effective therapeutic maintenance in IFX-naive patients. CT-P13 had an acceptable safety profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02925338.

Treatment burden, adherence, and quality of life in children with daily GH treatment in France.

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe in a real-life setting the treatment burden and adherence and quality of life (QOL) of children treated with daily injections of growth hormone and their relationship with treatment duration. Design: This non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional French study involved children aged 3-17 years treated with daily growth hormone injections. Methods: Based on a recent validated dyad questionnaire, the mean overall life interference total score (100 = most interference) was described, with treatment adherence and QOL, using the Quality of Life of Short Stature Youth questionnaire (100 = best). All analyses were performed according to treatment duration prior to inclusion. Results: Among the 275/277 analyzed children, 166 (60.4%) had only growth hormone deficiency (GHD). In the GHD group, the mean age was 11.7 ± 3.2 years; median treatment duration was 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.8-6.4). The mean overall life interference total score was 27.7 ± 20.7 (95% CI (24.2; 31.2)), with non-significant correlation with treatment duration (P = 0.1925). Treatment adherence was good (95.0% of children reported receiving >80% of planned injections over the last month); it slightly decreased with treatment duration (P = 0.0364). Children's overall QOL was good (81.5 ± 16.6 and 77.6 ± 18.7 according to children and parents, respectively), but subscores of the coping and treatment impact domains were <50. Similar results were observed in all patients independently of the condition requiring treatment. Conclusions: This real-life French cohort confirms the treatment burden of daily growth hormone injections, as previously reported in an interventional study.

The effect of tofacitinib on residual pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Post hoc analysis of pooled data from nine randomised controlled trials to assess the effect of tofacitinib (oral Janus kinase inhibitor for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)) on residual pain in patients with RA or PsA with abrogated inflammation. METHODS: Patients who received ≥1 dose of tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, adalimumab or placebo with/without background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and had abrogated inflammation (swollen joint count (SJC)=0 and C reactive protein (CRP)<6 mg/L) after 3 months' therapy were included. Assessments included Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain at month 3 (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] 0-100 mm). Scores were summarised descriptively; treatment comparisons assessed by Bayesian network meta-analyses (BNMA). RESULTS: From the total population with RA/PsA, 14.9% (382 of 2568), 17.1% (118 of 691) and 5.5% (50 of 909) of patients receiving tofacitinib, adalimumab and placebo, respectively, had abrogated inflammation after 3 months' therapy. Patients with RA/PsA with abrogated inflammation receiving tofacitinib/adalimumab had higher baseline CRP versus placebo; patients with RA receiving tofacitinib/adalimumab had lower SJC and longer disease duration versus placebo. Median residual pain (VAS) at month 3 was 17.0, 19.0 and 33.5 in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib, adalimumab or placebo, and 24.0, 21.0 and 27.0 in patients with PsA, respectively. Residual pain reductions with tofacitinib/adalimumab versus placebo were less prominent in patients with PsA versus patients with RA, with no significant differences between tofacitinib/adalimumab, per BNMA. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA/PsA with abrogated inflammation receiving tofacitinib/adalimumab had greater residual pain reduction versus placebo at month 3. Results were similar between tofacitinib and adalimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT00960440; NCT00847613; NCT00814307; NCT00856544; NCT00853385; NCT01039688; NCT02187055; NCT01877668; NCT01882439).

Pegvisomant treatment in acromegaly in clinical practice: Final results of the French ACROSTUDY (312 patients).

OBJECTIVE: We report the final analysis of the French ACROSTUDY, using data revised and enriched since the 2013 interim analysis. Our objective was to validate the use of pegvisomant (PEGV) in the treatment of acromegaly and to determine efficacy and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with acromegaly treated with PEGV and followed up for at least 5 years were included. Eighty-eight investigators from 62 clinical centers in France included patients from April 2007 to April 2014. PEGV dose and administration frequency were determined by the physicians, based on their clinical evaluation and local habits. No additional examinations beyond those performed in normal follow-up were required. Minimum recommended follow-up included check-ups at treatment initiation, 6 months, 12 months and then annually. RESULTS: In total, 312 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 46.1±14.3 years at introduction of PEGV. Median PEGV treatment duration was 6.3 years and median follow-up was 5.6 years. Median dose at initiation was 10mg/day. The percentages of patients with IGF-1 ≤ ULN (upper limit of normal) were 10% (n=300) at baseline, 54% at 6 months (n=278), and 61.7% (n=253) at 2 years, then stabilizing at 64.4% (n=180) at 5 years. Mean PEGV dose was 17.4±11.7mg in patients with controlled disease versus 21.1±17.3mg in those without control at 5 years. At 5 years, 21.8% of patients (54/248) were receiving >30mg PEGV per day. In patients with at least one pituitary imaging procedure during the 5-year follow-up (n=292), the most recent image showed stable tumor volume in 212 subjects (72.6%), increased volume in 13 (4.5%), and decreased volume in 30 (10.3%). No PEGV treatments were permanently discontinued due to transaminase elevation. There were no cases of liver failure. CONCLUSION: The French ACROSTUDY showed normalization of IGF-1 levels in 64.4% of a real-life cohort of patients, mostly with uncontrolled disease despite multiple prior therapies. Long-term follow-up showed a sustained effectiveness and good long-term safety.

Pegvisomant in combination or pegvisomant alone after failure of somatostatin analogs in acromegaly patients: an observational French ACROSTUDY cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: After surgery, when somatostatin analogs (SAs) do not normalise IGF-I, pegvisomant (PEG) is indicated. Our aim was to define the medical reasons for the treatment of patients with PEG as monotherapy (M) or combined with SA, either as primary bitherapy, PB (PEG is secondarily introduced after SA) or as secondary bitherapy, SB (SAs secondarily introduced after PEG). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed French data from ACROSTUDY. RESULTS: 167, 88 and 57 patients were treated with M, PB or SB, respectively, during a median time of 80, 42 and 70 months. The median PEG dose was respectively 15, 10 and 20 mg. Before PEG, the mean IGF-I level did not differ between M and PB but the proportion of patients with suprasellar tumour extension was higher in PB group (67.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.022). SB regimen was used preferentially in patients with tumour increase and IGF-I level difficult to normalise under PEG. In both secondary regimens, the decrease of the frequency of PEG's injections, compared to monotherapy was confirmed. However, the mean weekly dose of PEG between M and PB remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: The medical rationale for continuing SAs rather than switching to PEG alone in patients who do not normalise IGF-I under SAs was a tumour concern with suprasellar extension and tumour shrinkage under SA. A potential explanation for introducing SA in association with PEG appears to be a tumour enlargement and difficulties to normalise IGF-I levels under PEG given alone. In both regimens, the prospect of lowering PEG injection frequency favoured the choice.

Real-world Experience With Sunitinib Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to Risk Score.

BACKGROUND: ADONIS is an ongoing observational study in 9 European countries, designed to evaluate treatment patterns/outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line sunitinib and/or second-line axitinib post sunitinib. We present an evaluation of sunitinib efficacy by risk group, in the real-world setting examined in ADONIS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled at the start of first-line sunitinib treatment or second-line axitinib post sunitinib treatment. Evaluation of sunitinib efficacy was assessed by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk criteria. RESULTS: For all patients in this analysis (N = 467), the median progression-free survival was 23.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5-28.5 months), 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.1-17.4 months), and 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.7 months) for IMDC favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively. The median overall survival was 97.1 months (95% CI, 46.3 months-not evaluable [NE]), 33.5 months (95% CI, 20.5-46.6 months), and 10.0 months (95% CI, 4.5-19.8 months) for the respective risk groups. Data on individual risk factors were available for a subgroup of patients, allowing analysis by intermediate risk by 1 versus 2 risk factors. When including this subgroup (n = 120), the median overall survival for IMDC favorable-, intermediate-1, and intermediate-2 risk factors was 21.6 months (95% CI, 16.3 months-NE), 20.5 months (15.5 months-NE), and 15.1 months (4.1 months-NE), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients overall and by risk-group stratification, survival estimates were aligned with previously published data. In patients with intermediate-1 risk, overall survival was very similar to patients with favorable risk. However, further exploration of outcome data from different sources is needed to confirm these observations.

Psychometric properties of sleep and coping numeric rating scales in rheumatoid arthritis: a subanalysis of an etanercept trial.

OBJECTIVES: In rheumatoid arthritis, quality of sleep and ability to cope are important for patients; however their usefulness as outcome measures is not well established. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of an open-label 12-week trial of etanercept in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients with visits at screening, baseline and over 12 weeks. Outcomes measured included Disease Activity Score 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28), numeric rating scales for sleep, coping, patient and physician-global assessment, pain and fatigue, and modified-HAQ. Reliability between screening and baseline visits by intra-class correlation, and responsiveness between baseline and 12 weeks by standardised response means were assessed for each outcome. RESULTS: In 108 patients, mean age 54 (standard deviation (SD) 13) years, mean disease duration 8 (SD 7) years, 75% women; disease activity was high at baseline: mean DAS28 5.5 (SD 0.8). Reliability intra-class correlation was 0.83[95% confidence interval: 0.77;0.88] for sleep, 0.81[0.74;0.87] for modified-HAQ, 0.80[0.71;0.86] for fatigue, 0.72[0.62;0.80] for physician-global assessment, 0.66[0.54;076] for coping, 0.65[0.53;0.75] for pain and 0.63[0.50;0.73] for patient-global assessment. Responsiveness standardised response means was 1.65[1.32;2.10] for physician-global assessment, 1.37[1.09;1.73] for pain, 1.36[1.08;1.73] for patient-global assessment, 1.15[0.95;1.41] for fatigue, 0.96[0.70;1.28] for coping, 0.92[0.73;1.15] for sleep and 0.86[0.69;1.07] for modified-HAQ. CONCLUSIONS: Numeric rating scales assessing sleep and coping were found to be generally as reliable as 'usual' outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. Responsiveness was less high, indicating these domains of health may be less accessible to biologic treatment. When assessing the patient's perspective on treatment, it is feasible and valid to measure sleep and coping by numeric rating scales.

Etanercept reduces symptoms and severity of psoriasis after cessation of cyclosporine therapy: results of the SCORE study.

Cyclosporine is an established therapy for psoriasis that provides rapid relief of symptoms but has long-term toxic side effects. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of etanercept as replacement therapy for cyclosporine in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Patients with plaque psoriasis were given cyclosporine 5 mg/kg/day until achievement of PASI50 at which point cyclosporine was tapered to 0 over 6 weeks. At week 6, patients were randomised (1:1) to receive etanercept (50 mg/week) or placebo for an additional 24 weeks. Patients in the etanercept group (n = 58) experienced a reduction of -1.1 in mean PASI score (p = 0.233 vs. cyclosporine) at week 30; patients in the placebo group (n = 62) had mean PASI increase of 3.7 (p < 0.001 vs. cyclosporine). The incidence of patients reporting any adverse events was not significant between groups (77% etanercept, 74% placebo; p = 0.675). Etanercept demonstrated higher efficacy and good tolerability as replacement therapy for cyclosporine in plaque psoriasis.

When to adjust therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after initiation of etanercept plus methotrexate or methotrexate alone: findings from a randomized study (COMET).

OBJECTIVE: The objective of these posthoc analyses was to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes as predictors of poor response after 1 year of treatment with combination etanercept/methotrexate (ETN/MTX) therapy versus MTX monotherapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Participants with moderate to severe RA [28-joint Disease Activity Score-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) ≥ 3.2] of 3-24 months' duration received ETN 50 mg weekly plus MTX or MTX monotherapy for 52 weeks. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the likelihood of remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) after 1 year despite poor clinical short-term treatment effects (e.g., absolute or changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR after 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24 weeks of therapy). RESULTS: The magnitude of disease activity and its improvement and timing influenced remission probability in both treatment groups; remission rate was diminished with higher disease activity levels and lower response levels over time from weeks 4 to 24. The rate of DAS28-ESR remission at 1 year was generally greater with ETN/MTX than with MTX alone at most timepoints from weeks 4 to 24. Despite persistent high disease activity (DAS28-ESR > 5.1) after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks of therapy, 35%, 27%, 25%, and 22% of patients, respectively, in the ETN/MTX group achieved DAS28-ESR remission after 1 year of continuous treatment; the respective proportions were 33%, 27%, 8%, and 13% in the MTX group. CONCLUSION: High disease activity and less improvement with treatment over time in the initial 24 weeks of treatment, particularly after 12 weeks, were predictive of a lower remission rate after 1 year.

Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID).

INTRODUCTION: The Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on patient quality of life. It comprises 7 domains that are evaluated as continuous variables from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The objective was to define and identify cut-off values for disease activity states as well as improvement scores in order to present results at the individual level (for example, patient in acceptable state, improved patient). METHODS: Patients with definite active RA requiring anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy were seen at screening, baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of etanercept therapy. Answers to "Gold standard" questions on improvement (MCII: Minimum Clinically Important Improvement) and an acceptable status (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) were collected as well as the RAID score and Disease Activity Score 28- erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR). Cut-offs were defined by different techniques including empirical, measurement error and gold standard anchors. The external validity of these cut-offs was evaluated using the positive likelihood ratio (LR) based on the patient's perspective (for example, patient's global) and on low disease activity status (such as DAS28-ESR). RESULTS: Ninety-seven (97) of the 108 recruited patients (age: 54 ± 13 years old, female gender: 75%, rheumatoid factor positive: 81%, disease duration: 8 ± 7 years, CRP: 18 ± 30 mg/l, DAS28-ESR: 5.4 ± 0.8) completed the 12 weeks of the study. The different techniques suggested thresholds ranging from 0.2 to 3 (absolute change) and from 6 to 50% (relative change) for defining MCII and thresholds from less than 1 to less than 4.2 for defining PASS. The evaluation of external validity (LR+) showed the highest LR+ was obtained with thresholds of 3 for absolute change; 50% for relative change and less than 2 for an acceptable status. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that thresholds defined for continuous variables are closely related to the methodological technique, justifying a systematic evaluation of their validity. Our results suggested that a change of at least 3 points (absolute) or 50% (relative) in the RAID score should be used to define a MCII and that a maximal value of 2 defines an acceptable status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT004768053.

Onset of action of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Onset of action is considered to be a key characteristic of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The efficacy of TNF blockers is usually evaluated after 2 to 4 weeks of therapy. EULAR-RAID is a valid patient-reported outcome composite index. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the onset of action of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis patients according to the EULAR-RAID score. METHODS: An open-label, single-arm (etanercept 50 mg/week), 12-week study was carried out in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were asked to fill in the RAID score questionnaire each day for the first 14 days of the study and at the 4-week and 12-week visits. Onset of action was evaluated by considering: a) changes over time of the EULAR-RAID score; b) the percentage of patients achieving an 'acceptable' condition according to the EULAR-RAID score (e.g. a score ≤3.00). RESULTS: Of the 120 screened patients, 108 (female: 75%), age 54±13 years, disease duration 8±7 years) were enrolled. At baseline, patients had active rheumatoid arthritis (DAS: 5.4±0.8; CRP: 18.±30mg/l). Eleven patients dropped out of the study. A statistically significant decrease in the EULAR-RAID score was observed by day 1 of therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion of patients achieving an acceptable RAID score were 29.8 [% 95% C.I. 23.8-X42.6], 50 % [95% C.I. 41-60.9], 51.9% [95% C.I. 43.8-63.7], 56% [95% C.I. 49.5-69.1, after 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks of therapy respectively. The median time to achieve an acceptable EULAR-RAID score was 14.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study suggests that patients can perceive a clinically relevant improvement by the first week of etanercept therapy.

The influence of the definition of patient global assessment in assessment of disease activity according to the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Patient global assessment (PGA) is one of the 4 items included in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for evaluation of activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We studied the influence of the use of 3 different techniques of PGA on the assessment of disease activity. METHODS: We evaluated 3 different DAS28 according to the technique of PGA in 108 patients with active RA before and after 12 weeks of etanercept therapy. RESULTS: The reliability (intraclass coefficient of correlation) between screening and baseline was very high and similar for the 3 DAS28. The percentage of patients in the different states of disease (from remission to higher disease activity) and the sensitivity to change across the 3 DAS28 scales were very similar. CONCLUSION: The different techniques of collection of PGA to be included in the DAS calculation yield similar results. However, an accepted, unequivocal technique should be encouraged in order to reduce heterogeneity in scoring DAS among patients with RA.

Effect of mTOR inhibitor on body weight: from an experimental rat model to human transplant patients.

UNLABELLED: The aim was to study the influence of sirolimus (SRL) on body weight in a rat model and in kidney transplant patients. Wistar rats (15 weeks old) were either treated with vehicle (VEH; n = 8) or SRL (n = 7) 1.0 mg/kg three times per week for 12 weeks. Body mass and food intake were measured weekly. Adipocyte diameter was determined in hematoxylin-eosin stains. The body mass index (BMI) obtained from clinical kidney transplant trials comparing SRL-based with cyclosporine-based therapy was analyzed. ANIMALS: SRL produced a decrease of the weight gain curve. At the end of the study, mean body weight in the SRL group was lower than in the VEH group (356 vs. 507 g, P < 0.01) in spite of comparable food intake normalized for body weight was not different. Mean adipocyte diameter was 36 mum in VEH and 25 mum in SRL rats (P = 0.009). Mean SRL blood trough concentration was 38 ng/ml. Kidney transplant patients: Two years after transplantation, BMI was significantly lower in the SRL-based treatment arm compared to cyclosporine (24.17 +/- 2.99 vs. 25.97 +/- 5.01 kg/m(2), P = 0.031). SRL treatment leads to less body mass. Adipocyte cell diameter was reduced in SRL-treated animals. A possible explanation may be the effects of SRL on metabolic regulation and cell growth.

Accuracy and variability of equations to estimate glomerular filtration rates in renal transplant patients receiving sirolimus and/or calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression.

Measured glomerular filtration rates (mGFRs) were obtained by (99)mTc-DPTA, (125)I-iothalamate, iohexol, (51)Cr-EDTA, non-radiolabeled iothalamate, or inulin clearance from centers agreeing to perform mGFR in six completed and one ongoing Wyeth Research multicenter trials evaluating sirolimus (SRL) in regimens with or without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Estimated GFRs (eGFRs) were calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault (eGFR(CG)), Nankivell (eGFR(NK)), and simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR(MDRD)) equations. Bias, precision, and accuracy for each of these equations were estimated by tertiles and by regimen. For the Rapamune Maintenance Regimen (RMR) trial, eGFR outcomes were also compared between treatments {[SRL-cyclosporine (CsA) versus SRL]} using the three eGFR formulas. In the lowest mGFR tertile (6-40 ml/min), eGFR(MDRD) gave the best accuracy with the least bias whereas eGFR(NK) and eGFR(CG) performed better in the highest mGFR tertile (58-139 ml/min). At 24 months in the RMR study, mean differences in eGFR between treatments were 13.6, 14.2, and 13.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for eGFR(CG), eGFR(NK), and eGFR(MDRD), respectively, favoring CsA withdrawal (P-values for all <0.001). The accuracy of the three eGFR equations was affected by mGFR range but not by immunosuppressive regimens utilizing SRL, SRL-CNI or CNI-based therapy.

Incidence of anemia in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients: the importance of preserving renal function.

Sirolimus (SRL) has a concentration-related effect on hematopoiesis. In this study, 430 renal transplant recipients were randomized (1:1) 3 months post-transplantation to continue SRL-cyclosporine (CsA)-steroids (ST) or to have CsA withdrawn (SRL-ST). Over 5 years, on therapy calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), hematological indices, erythropoietin (EPO) use, and rates of mild, moderate, and severe anemia were determined. Longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models examined covariates predicting hemoglobin (Hgb) levels. Mean Hgb was significantly lower with SRL-ST at 6 months; but subsequently became significantly higher (at 2 years, 129 vs. 135 g/l, SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST, P<0.001). Mean corpuscular volume was low with both therapies, and significantly lower with SRL-ST. EPO use was similar in the two groups, approximately 30% during the first year and 10% thereafter. The incidence of anemia was significantly higher with SRL-CsA-ST>or=2 years. At year 5, only 39.1% of SRL-CsA-ST patients had normal Hgb vs. 68.5% of SRL-ST patients. GFR and recipient age as well as the interaction term x treatment time were significant covariates predicting Hgb. CsA withdrawal followed by SRL immunotherapy resulted in significantly less anemia than SRL-CsA-ST, despite twofold higher SRL exposure. This suggests that the improvement in GFR accompanying CsA withdrawal may mitigate the effect of SRL on hematopoiesis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00428064).

Factors influencing glomerular filtration rate in renal transplantation after cyclosporine withdrawal using sirolimus-based therapy: a multivariate analysis of results at five years.

Changes in calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from baseline to five yr were analyzed in relation to risk factors among renal transplant recipients. At three months after transplantation (baseline), 430 eligible patients receiving sirolimus (SRL), cyclosporine (CsA), and steroids (ST) were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue SRL-CsA-ST or have CsA withdrawn and SRL trough levels increased (SRL-ST group). For each risk factor, changes from baseline were compared within each treatment using a t-test and between treatments using ANCOVA. Univariate then multivariate robust linear regression analyses were also performed. In the SRL-ST group, changes from baseline were not significantly different for any risk factor. With the exception of cold ischemia time >24 h, GFR values declined significantly for all risk factors in SRL-CsA-ST patients. For all risk factors, except second transplant or cold ischemia time >24 h, renal function was significantly different between groups. By order of significance in the multivariate analysis, treatment (p < 0.001), donor age (p < 0.001), proteinuria (p < 0.001), and biopsy-confirmed rejection (p = 0.010) were significant predictors of GFR change from baseline. In conclusion, patients with risk factors for reduced renal function benefit from SRL maintenance therapy without CsA vs. those remaining on CsA.

Sirolimus therapy after early cyclosporine withdrawal reduces the risk for cancer in adult renal transplantation.

Sirolimus (SRL) is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor that, in contrast to cyclosporine (CsA), has been shown to inhibit rather than promote cancers in experimental models. At 3 mo +/- 2 wk after renal transplantation, 430 of 525 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to remain on SRL-CsA-steroids (ST) or to have CsA withdrawn and SRL troughs increased two-fold (SRL-ST). Median times to first skin and nonskin malignancies were compared between treatments using a survival analysis. Mean annualized rates of skin malignancy were calculated, and the relative risk was determined using a Poisson model. Malignancy-free survival rates for nonskin malignancies were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test. At 5 yr, the median time to a first skin carcinoma was delayed (491 versus 1126 d; log-rank test, P = 0.007), and the risk for an event was significantly lower with SRL-ST therapy (relative risk SRL-ST to SRL-CsA-ST 0.346; 95% confidence interval 0.227 to 0.526; P < 0.001, intention-to-treat analysis). The relative risks for both basal and squamous cell carcinomas were significantly reduced. Kaplan-Meier estimates of nonskin cancer were 9.6 versus 4.0% (SRL-CsA-ST versus SRL-ST; P = 0.032, intention-to-treat analysis). Nonskin cancers included those of the lung, larynx, oropharynx, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, prostate, breast, thyroid, and cervix as well as glioma, liposarcoma, astrocytoma, leukemia, lymphoma, and Kaposi's sarcoma. Patients who received SRL-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free therapy after CsA withdrawal at month 3 had a reduced incidence of both skin and nonskin malignancies at 5 yr after renal transplantation compared with those who received SRL therapy combined with CsA. Longer follow-up and additional trials are needed to confirm these promising results.

Early cyclosporine withdrawal from a sirolimus-based regimen results in better renal allograft survival and renal function at 48 months after transplantation.

We report the 48-month results of a trial testing whether withdrawal of cyclosporine (CsA) from a sirolimus (SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen would impact renal allograft survival. Eligible patients receiving SRL-CsA-ST from transplantation were randomly assigned at 3 months to remain on triple therapy (SRL-CsA-ST, n = 215) or to have CsA withdrawn and SRL trough concentrations increased (SRL-ST, n = 215). SRL-ST therapy resulted in significantly better graft survival, either when including death with a functioning graft as an event (84.2% vs. 91.5%, P = 0.024) or when censoring it (90.6% vs. 96.1%, P = 0.026). Calculated glomerular filtration rate (43.8 vs. 58.3 ml/min, P < 0.001) and mean arterial blood pressure (101.3 vs. 97.1 mmHg, P = 0.047) were also improved with SRL-ST. Differences in the incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection after randomization (6.5% vs. 10.2%, SRL-CsA-ST versus SRL-ST, respectively) and mortality (7.9% vs. 4.7%) were not significant. SRL-CsA-ST-treated patients had significantly higher incidences of adverse events generally associated with CsA, whereas those in the SRL-ST group experienced greater frequencies of events commonly related to higher trough levels of SRL. In conclusion, early withdrawal of CsA from a SRL-CsA-ST regimen rapidly improves renal function and ultimately results in better graft survival.

Sirolimus-based therapy following early cyclosporine withdrawal provides significantly improved renal histology and function at 3 years.

Graft function and histology are predictive of renal transplant survival. The Rapamune Maintenance Regimen study demonstrated that early cyclosporine (CsA) withdrawal from a sirolimus (SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen improved renal function and blood pressure. We report the protocol-mandated biopsy findings from that study. Renal transplant patients (n = 430) receiving SRL-CsA-ST were randomized at 3 months after transplantation to remain on SRL-CsA-ST, or to have CsA withdrawn (SRL-ST group). Protocol-mandated biopsies were performed at engraftment and at 12 and 36 months. Two pathologists blindly evaluated 484 biopsies to obtain the Chronic Allograft Damage Index (CADI) scores. At 36 months among patients with serial biopsies (n = 63), the mean CADI score was significantly lower with SRL-ST(4.70 vs. 3.20, p = 0.003), as was the mean tubular atrophy score (0.77 vs. 0.32, p < 0.001). All six components of the CADI score were numerically lower in SRL-ST group; moreover, inflammation and the tubular atrophy scores decreased significantly in the SRL-ST group between 12 and 36 months. The calculated glomerular filtration rate at 36 months was significantly better in the CsA-withdrawal group (54.8 vs. 68.2 mL/min, p = 0.009). In conclusion, withdrawing CsA from the SRL-CsA-ST regimen resulted in improved renal histology and function.