Identification of Antibodies to DQß:DRα Interisotypic Heterodimers in Human Sera.

BACKGROUND: HLA class II antigens, DR, DQ, and DP, comprised an α and ß chains, which typically combine, within the same isotype, to form the major histocompatibility complex:peptide complex. Interisotypic pairing is not commonly observed. Although reports of DQß:DRα heterodimers exist, the pairing was reported to be unstable and, therefore, not studied to any extent. METHODS: DQß:DRα single antigens were produced through transfectant cell lines and used to identify and characterize positive reactive human sera by a multiplex bead-based assay. RESULTS: Stable DQß:DRα transfectants were constructed. Cell surface staining with class II-specific monoclonal antibodies revealed that some DQB1 alleles appear to be more efficient in expressing DQß:DRα heterodimers. Interestingly, alleles within the same serological group varied in their efficiency of forming dimers on the cell surface. For example, DQß0601:DRα had the highest transfection and cell membrane expression efficiency among 16 common DQB1 alleles tested. In contrast, DQß0603:DRα-positive transfectants demonstrated minimal surface expression. Assembly of DQß0601:DRα was not affected by the presence of a DQα chain. DQß0601:DRα and DQß0603:DRα single-antigen beads were used to screen human sera. Positive sera were identified that reacted to the unique epitopes of DQß0601:DRα protein on the cell surface of the transfectants. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies have demonstrated that unique DQß:DRα heterodimers can be formed and are stably expressed on the cell surface. Such antigenic combinations, presented on single-antigen beads, demonstrated that patient sera can react with such heterodimers. Investigations on the potential clinical roles of antibodies against such interisotypic heterodimers are now possible.

HLA class I peptide polymorphisms contribute to class II DQß0603:DQα0103 antibody specificity.

Antibodies reactive to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) represent a barrier for patients awaiting transplantation. Based on reactivity patterns in single-antigen bead (SAB) assays, various epitope matching algorithms have been proposed to improve transplant outcomes. However, some antibody reactivities cannot be explained by amino acid motifs, leading to uncertainty about their clinical relevance. Antibodies against the HLA class II molecule, DQß0603:DQα0103, present in some candidates, represent one such example. Here, we show that peptides derived from amino acids 119-148 of the HLA class I heavy chain are bound to DQß0603:DQα0103 proteins and contribute to antibody reactivity through an HLA-DM-dependent process. Moreover, antibody reactivity is impacted by the specific amino acid sequence presented. In summary, we demonstrate that polymorphic HLA class I peptides, bound to HLA class II proteins, can directly or indirectly be part of the antibody binding epitope. Our findings have potential important implications for the field of transplant immunology and for our understanding of adaptive immunity.

COVID-19 infection and vaccination rarely impact HLA antibody profile in waitlisted renal transplant candidates- a multicenter cohort.

Although rare, infection and vaccination can result in antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We analyzed the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination on HLA antibodies in waitlisted renal transplant candidates. Specificities were collected and adjudicated if the calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) changed after exposure. Of 409 patients, 285 (69.7 %) had an initial cPRA of 0 %, and 56 (13.7 %) had an initial cPRA > 80 %. The cPRA changed in 26 patients (6.4 %), 16 (3.9 %) increased, and 10 (2.4 %) decreased. Based on cPRA adjudication, cPRA differences generally resulted from a small number of specificities with subtle fluctuations around the borderline of the participating centers' cutoff for unacceptable antigen listing. All five COVID recovered patients with an increased cPRA were female (p = 0.02). In summary, exposure to this virus or vaccine does not increase HLA antibody specificities and their MFI in approximately 99 % of cases and 97 % of sensitized patients. These results have implications for virtual crossmatching at the time of organ offer after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, and these events of unclear clinical significance should not influence vaccination programs.

Loss of heterozygosity leading to incorrect HLA typing for platelet-transfusion refractory patient.

BACKGROUND: Management of platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients due to anti-HLA antibodies includes the provision of HLA-matched (HLAm) platelets (PLT) or PLTs that are negative for HLA antigens corresponding to the recipient antibodies. Obtaining HLAm PLTs is predicated on accurate HLA antigen typing of the recipient and donor. Here, we present the clinical implications of a case involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a patient presented for PR workup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: HLA typing was performed by three methods: (1) Real-time PCR; (2) Sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) typing test; and (3) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Cytogenomic SNP microarray was utilized to assess LOH. RESULTS: A 30-year-old female with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia was found to be PR secondary to HLA sensitization. A peripheral blood (PB) sample, containing 93% myeloid blast cells, was sent for HLA typing for the provision of HLAm PLTs. HLA typing revealed homozygosity at the HLA-A locus but was heterozygous at the -B and -C loci. After chemotherapy, HLA typing on a new PB sample, devoid of blast cells, identified HLA-A locus heterozygosity, which was subsequently confirmed by real-time PCR and NGS. Cytogenomic SNP microarray analysis demonstrated LOH of the HLA-A locus on chromosome 6p in the pretreatment sample but not in the posttreatment sample. CONCLUSION: In hematologic patients with high tumor burden, HLA homozygosity should be viewed with suspicion for potential LOH. Therefore, HLA testing should be repeated, preferably with a non-hematological source (e.g., buccal swab) or following successful reduction of the tumor burden.

Development of donor specific antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney and heart transplant recipients.

This study examined the development of new or changes in donor specific antibodies (DSA) mean-fluorescence intensity (MFI) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 100 kidney and 50 heart transplant recipients. The study was performed when the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended two doses of Pfizer/BioNTech [BNT162b2] and Moderna [mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2] vaccine or 1 dose Johnson & Johnson/Janssen [Ad26.COV2·S] vaccines for full vaccination in transplant recipients. A novel assay bead-based platform for detecting antibodies against 4 domains of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to determine vaccine response (SA) and one nucleocapsid protein (NC) to determine prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was utilized. These assays were performed on the multiplex, bead-based platform utilized to assay DSA levels. 61/150 patients (40.7%) had successful vaccination. 18 patients had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection based on positive NC assay or previous Covid-19 oropharyngeal swab. 138 patients had no DSA prior to vaccination but 3 heart recipients developed new DSA's. Among 12 patients with known DSA prior to vaccination, 4 developed new DSA's or increased MFI. All 7 patients with new or increased DSA had stable graft function without rejection and had no changes in immunosuppression. All 8 patients with stable post vaccine DSA had stable graft function and immunosuppression was not changed. The presence of DSA before vaccination was associated with subsequent development of increased MFI or new DSA's (p = 0.001). There was no association between pre-vaccine DSA and positive vaccine response (NS). There was no association with successful vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and DSA changes (NS).

Implementing virtual crossmatch based diagnostic management teams in human leukocyte antigen laboratories and transplant programs.

Histocompatibility testing has continuously evolved since its inception. One such advancement is the implementation of the virtual crossmatch (VXM). Recent changes to allograft allocation schemes have resulted in increased organ sharing over greater distances, resulting in expanded utilization of the VXM to assess donor: recipient compatibility. In fact, the VXM has become a major arbitrator of pre-transplant compatibility assessment prior to both deceased and living donor organ allocation. This shift in pre-transplant practice is concurrent with the US healthcare systems' move towards more inclusive and coordinated team-based management approach to disease diagnosis. Diagnostic Management Teams (DMTs) exemplify this shift in patient care. Our institution seized the opportunity to build and implement a VXM DMT to improve and streamline pre-transplant assessment. This VXM DMT is compliant with US regulatory standards and provides a consultative report containing relevant pre-transplant information, test interpretation as well as recommendations for HLA additional (if any) testing. Herein we describe the development of and experience with the VXM DMT a year after its launch.

Development and Validation of a Multiplex, Bead-based Assay to Detect Antibodies Directed Against SARS-CoV-2 Proteins.

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients who develop COVID-19 may be at increased risk for morbidity and mortality. Determining the status of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both candidates and recipients will be important to understand the epidemiology and clinical course of COVID-19 in this population. While there are multiple tests to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, their performance is variable. Tests vary according to their platforms and the antigenic targets which make interpretation of the results challenging. Furthermore, for some assays, sensitivity and specificity are less than optimal. Additionally, currently available serological tests do not exclude the possibility that positive responses are due to cross reactive antibodies to community coronaviruses rather than SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: This study describes the development and validation of a high-throughput multiplex antibody detection assay. RESULTS: The multiplex assay has the capacity to identify, simultaneously, patient responses to 5 SARS-CoV-2 proteins, namely, the full spike protein, 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor binding domain), and the nucleocapsid protein. The antibody response to the above proteins are SARS-CoV-2-specific, as antibodies against 4 common coronaviruses do not cross-react. CONCLUSIONS: This new assay provides a novel tool to interrogate the spectrum of immune responses to SAR-CoV-2 and is uniquely suitable for use in the transplant setting. Test configuration is essentially identical to the single antigen bead assays used in the majority of histocompatibility laboratories around the world and could easily be implemented into routine screening of transplant candidates and recipients.

The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?

Though solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) testing has provided major advances to the HLA community and organ allocation, it has not been without limitations. In particular, false-positive reactions lead to interpretative challenges and the potential to preclude a transplant if the corresponding antigens are deemed unacceptable. Two different vendor platforms are commercially available for SAB testing, one more recent than the other. The aim herein was to assess the benefit of using the newer SAB platform in situations where the primary platform yielded suspicious (specifically, false positive) reactions. Therefore, 42 serum samples with commonly encountered false-positive patterns observed in our laboratory were tested with the newer platform. Cases were classified as resolved, equivalent, or divergent based on whether the second platform produced no reactivity, the same pattern, or a distinctly different pattern compared to the primary platform, respectively. Approximately 33% of cases were resolved, 46% were equivalent, and 21% were divergent. The project revealed advantages of adding a second SAB platform to the laboratory's test menu including resolving challenging samples and including broader coverage of different alleles and unique class II alpha/beta subunit combinations. However, the challenges of validating, maintaining, and billing for another test method in the laboratory may be barriers to routine use.

A simple electronic tool for assessing amino acid sequence polymorphisms within exon-2 of HLA-DPB1 alleles.

In November 2014, the OPTN/UNOS Board of Directors mandated that HLA-DPB1 typing be performed for all deceased donors. Currently, there are over 1,000 known HLA DPB1 alleles, yet fewer than 30 are represented on commonly used single antigen bead (SAB) solid phase antibody assays. Moreover, the official World Health Organization (WHO) nomenclature for the DPB1 locus does not permit assessment of structural relationships between alleles based on their names. Thus, for donor DPB1 alleles lacking a corresponding SAB, determining the compatibility between a donor-recipient pair when the recipient possesses DPB1 antibodies currently requires the use of manual sequence alignments. Multiple studies have reported that DPB1 alleles can be classified into serological-defined categories based on shared protein sequence motifs residing in distinct hypervariable regions. To date, six such motifs have been recognized. To address this problem, we developed a computer-assisted tool to compare donor and recipient DPB1 allele sequences, specifically those defined by DPB1 hypervariable region motifs located in exon 2 (http://dpreport.hlatools.org). This tool quickly identifies mismatched DPB1 motifs, and easily permits the identification of motif-based donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to DPB1.

A blueprint for electronic utilization of ambiguous molecular HLA typing data in organ allocation systems and virtual crossmatch.

Virtual crossmatch (VXM) compares a transplant candidate's unacceptable antigens to the HLA typing of the donor before an organ offer is accepted and, in selected cases, supplant a prospective physical crossmatch. However, deceased donor typing can be ambiguous, leading to uncertainty in compatibility prediction. We have developed a prototype web application that utilizes ambiguous HLA molecular typing data to predict which unacceptable antigens are present in the donor HLA genotype as donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The application compares a candidate's listed unacceptable antigens to computed probabilities of all possible two-field donor HLA alleles and UNOS antigens. The VIrtual CrossmaTch for mOleculaR HLA typing (VICTOR) tool can be accessed at http://www.transplanttoolbox.org/victor. We reanalyzed historical VXM cases where a transplant center's manual interpretation of molecular typing results influenced offer evaluation. We found that interpretation of ambiguous donor molecular typing data using imputation could one day influence VXM decisions if the DSA predictions were rigorously validated. Standardized interpretation of molecular typing data, if applied to the match run, could also change which offers are made. HLA typing ambiguity has been an underappreciated source of immunological risk in organ transplantation. The VICTOR tool can serve as a testbed for development of allocation policies with the aim of decreasing offers refused due to HLA incompatibility.

Identification of a recurrent pattern of false-positivity by Luminex HLA MHC class I single antigen bead testing.

Previously, a distinct MHC class II Luminex-single antigen bead (SAB) pattern was described and attributed to antibodies targeting denatured antigens. In this study, we describe a distinct MHC class I reactivity pattern observed in 1.8% (105/5992) of samples resulted in 2017. The pattern displays reactivity to the following Luminex-SABs: HLA-A*33:03, A*36:01, A*80:01, B*54:01, B*53:01, C*06:02, C*07:02, C*18:02, C*14:02, C*03:03, C*03:04, and C*15:02. This pattern was identified in patients with no sensitization history, negative FlowPRA results, and antibody to self-antigen(s). Epitope analysis failed to reveal a common determinant(s) to explain this pattern of reactivity. Additionally, we found this pattern to be prevalent in female patients (62%) and also those with systemic lupus erythematosus (62%). Given these findings, we speculate this pattern likely represents false-positive reactivity, possibly due to antibody targeting denatured antigens or a specific peptide, molecular mimicry, autoimmunity, or a combination thereof.

The impact of belatacept on third-party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept-treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept-treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.

The impact of transfused blood products on deceased donor HLA typing.

Accurate deceased donor HLA typing assumes that the blood sample tested contains only DNA from the organ donor. Prior to procurement, many organ donors are transfused at least one unit of red blood cells (RBC). Non-organ donor DNA acquired from transfusions may result in incorrect and/or ambiguous HLA typing. To address this question, we investigated the impact of RBC transfusion on organ donor HLA typing by using different in vitro transfusion models: leukoreduced (LR) and non-LR RBCs. Various quantities of LR and non-LR RBCs were added to normal peripheral blood and HLA typing was performed by real time PCR. Our results show that HLA typing of deceased donors can be impacted dependent upon the type and quantity of transfused RBCs. Importantly, if LR RBCs are given, HLA typing is unlikely to be affected, precluding the need to delay typing and obtain an alternative source of donor DNA.

Out with the old, in with the new: Virtual versus physical crossmatching in the modern era.

The virtual crossmatch (VXM) is gaining acceptance as an alternative approach to assess donor:recipient compatibility prior to transplantation. In contrast to a physical crossmatch, the virtual crossmatch does not require viable donor cells but rather relies on complete HLA typing of the donor and current antibody assessment of the recipient. Thus, the VXM can be performed in minutes which allows for faster transplant decisions thereby increasing the likelihood that organs can be shipped across significant distances yet safely transplanted. Here, we present a brief review of the past 50 years of histocompatibility testing; from the original complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch in 1969 to the new era of molecular HLA typing, solid-phase antibody testing and virtual crossmatching. These advancements have shaped a paradigm shift in our approach to transplantation. That is, foregoing a prospective physical crossmatch in favor of a VXM. In this review, we undertake an in-depth analysis of the pros- and cons- of physical and virtual crossmatching.Finally, we provide objective data on the selected use of the VXM which demonstrate the value of a VXM in lieu of the traditional physical crossmatch for safe and efficient organ transplantation.