Quinine compared to 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and midazolam as markers for CYP3A induction by rifampicin.

When developing new drugs appropriate markers for detecting induction and inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A enzymes (CYP3A) are needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quinine/3-hydroxyquinine metabolic ratio (quinine MR) with other suggested markers for CYP3A induction: endogenously formed 4ß-hydroxycholesterol, midazolam clearance in plasma and the 6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio in urine. We have previously performed a clinical trial in which 24 healthy subjects were randomized to take 10, 20 or 100 mg daily doses of rifampicin for 14 days (n = 8 in each group) to achieve a low and moderate CYP3A induction. In newly analyzed data from this study we can show that the quinine MR could detect CYP3A-induction even at the lowest dose of rifampicin (10 mg) (p < 0.01), comparable to a 4ß-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol ratio and midazolam clearance. The median fold-induction for the quinine MR compared to baseline was 1.7, 1.8 and 2.6 for the three dosing groups (10, 20 and 100 mg). In conclusion, in this study the quinine MR was comparable to midazolam clearance as a measure of CYP3A activity but easier to determine since only a single blood sample needs to be drawn.

Comparison of endogenous 4ß-hydroxycholesterol with midazolam as markers for CYP3A4 induction by rifampicin.

CYP3A4, considered the most important enzyme in drug metabolism, is often involved in drug-drug interactions. When developing new drugs, appropriate markers for detecting CYP3A4 induction are needed. Our study compared endogenously formed 4ß-hydroxycholesterol with the midazolam clearance in plasma and the 6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio in urine as markers for CYP3A4 induction. To this end, we performed a clinical trial in which 24 healthy subjects were randomized to 10, 20, or 100 mg daily doses of rifampicin for 14 days (n = 8 in each group) to achieve a low and moderate CYP3A4 induction. The CYP3A4 induction could be detected even at the lowest dose of rifampicin (10 mg) via the estimated midazolam clearance, the 4ß-hydroxycholesterol ratio (both P < 0.01), and the 6ß-hydroxycortisol ratio (P < 0.05). For the three dosing groups (10, 20, and 100 mg), the median fold induction from baseline was 2.0, 2.6, and 4.0 for the estimated midazolam clearance; 1.3, 1.6, and 2.5 for the 4ß-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol ratio; and 1.7, 2.9, and 3.1 for the 6ß-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio. In conclusion, the 4ß-hydroxycholesterol ratio is comparable to midazolam clearance as a marker of CYP3A4 induction, and each may be used to evaluate CYP3A4 induction in clinical trials evaluating drug-drug interactions for new drugs.

4beta-hydroxycholesterol as an endogenous marker for CYP3A4/5 activity. Stability and half-life of elimination after induction with rifampicin.

AIMS: The oxysterol 4beta-hydroxycholesterol has been suggested as a marker for CYP3A4/5 activity. We have previously shown that plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol continues to increase for several weeks after maximal induction of CYP3A4/5 by carbamazepine at the dose given. In the present study we aimed to determine the time course of the decrease in plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol after termination of induction of CYP3A4/5 by rifampicin. An additional aim was to determine the variation in plasma level of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol with time in 12 untreated healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects were allocated into three study groups of equal sizes. The volunteers were treated with rifampicin (either 20 mg day(-1), 100 mg day(-1) or 500 mg day(-1)) for 2 weeks. Blood samples were taken before, during and after rifampicin treatment. In another group of 12 untreated volunteers blood samples were collected at different time points in order to determine the intraindividual variations in plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol concentrations. Plasma levels of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol were determined by isotope-dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Rifampicin treatment increased plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol levels. After termination of rifampicin treatment plasma levels of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol decreased slowly with an apparent half-life of 17 days. The intraindividual variation in plasma levels of 4beta-hydroxycholesterol in untreated subjects was low, with coefficients of variation of between 4.8 and 13.2% over a period of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: After termination of induction of CYP3A4/5, plasma 4beta-hydroxycholesterol levels decreased slowly during 8 weeks. The half-life of elimination (17 days) resembled that of cholesterol rather than other oxysterols. The long half-life results in stable plasma concentrations with time.

An evaluation of the in vitro metabolism data for predicting the clearance and drug-drug interaction potential of CYP2C9 substrates.

In the early drug discovery process, metabolic stability and cytochrome P450 inhibition are often used as an early selection tool to identify useful compounds for further development. The reliability of the data in this process is therefore crucial. In the present study, in vitro enzyme kinetic data were used to predict the in vivo clearance and drug-drug interaction potential of four well known CYP2C9 substrates (tolbutamide, fluvastatin, ibuprofen and diclofenac) that are frequently used as benchmark substances in screening programs. Quantitative predictions of hepatic clearance using the well stirred prediction model and CL(int) calculated from enzyme kinetic measurements were not useful. Including and excluding protein binding resulted in under- and overestimation, respectively, of in vivo clearance. The only predicted in vivo clearance that fell into the range of reported measured values was for fluvastatin when protein binding was not included. In an open, randomized, seven-armed, crossover study in healthy volunteers, tolbutamide, ibuprofen, and fluvastatin were investigated as inhibitors of the metabolism of diclofenac, and vice versa. None of the combinations was found to interact with each other in vivo. The in vitro drug-drug interaction potential was investigated by K(i) determinations of the same combinations. In contrast to clearance predictions, the interaction potential in vivo was best predicted when plasma protein binding was included in the various models used. This study points to the uncertainty in calculating in vivo kinetics from in vitro enzyme kinetic data. The in vitro metabolic screening can thus be questioned as a compound selection tool without a proven in vitro-in vivo correlation.

Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, has a low potential for cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions.

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. After oral administration, ximelagatran is rapidly absorbed and extensively bioconverted, via two intermediates (ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran), to its active form, melagatran. In vitro studies have shown no evidence for involvement of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in either the bioactivation or the elimination of melagatran. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential of ximelagatran, the intermediates ethyl-melagatran and hydroxy-melagatran, and melagatran to inhibit the CYP system in vitro and in vivo, and the influence of three CYP substrates on the pharmacokinetics of melagatran in vivo. METHODS: The CYP inhibitory properties of ximelagatran, the intermediates and melagatran were tested in vitro by two different methods, using heterologously expressed enzymes or human liver microsomes. Diclofenac (CYP2C9), diazepam (CYP2C19) and nifedipine (CYP3A4) were chosen for coadministration with ximelagatran in healthy volunteers. Subjects received oral ximelagatran 24mg and/or diclofenac 50mg, a 10-minute intravenous infusion of diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, or nifedipine 60mg. The plasma pharmacokinetics of melagatran, diclofenac, diazepam, N-desmethyl-diazepam and nifedipine were determined when administered alone and in combination with ximelagatran. RESULTS: No inhibition, or only minor inhibition, of CYP enzymes by ximelagatran, the intermediates or melagatran was shown in the in vitro studies, suggesting that ximelagatran would not cause CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions in vivo. This result was confirmed in the clinical studies. There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine on coadministration with ximelagatran. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of melagatran when ximelagatran was administered alone or in combination with diclofenac, diazepam or nifedipine. CONCLUSION: As ximelagatran did not exert a significant effect on the hepatic CYP isoenzymes responsible for the metabolism of diclofenac, diazepam and nifedipine, it is reasonable to expect that it would have no effect on the metabolism of other drugs metabolised by these isoenzymes. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran are not expected to be altered by inhibition or induction of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 or CYP3A4. Together, the in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that metabolic drug-drug interactions involving the major human CYP enzymes should not be expected with ximelagatran.