Results after transplantation using donor hearts with preexisting coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac allografts with coronary artery disease may permit a selective expansion of the donor pool. Twenty-two recipients who received donor hearts with mild to moderate coronary artery disease on angiography were reviewed. All donor organs had preserved left ventricle function on echocardiogram. METHODS: The procedure was explained to the patients in detail. All survivors have at least 1 year of follow-up. If the coronary arteries of the donor heart were significantly occluded, then the implanting surgeon performed coronary revascularization. Donors were allocated to patients facing imminent death (group I, n = 4) or to those who would otherwise not have been transplanted (group II, n = 18). Median recipient age was 57 years old for group I and 68 years old for group II. Median follow-up was 25 months for group I and 44 for group II. RESULTS: Outcome was evaluated using survival and freedom from graft coronary disease as end points. In group I, 3 of the 4 hearts required revascularization. In group II, 10 of the 18 required revascularization. The majority of the revascularizations were recipient saphenous vein grafts (84.6%) to the donor left anterior descending artery (50%). The 1-month and 2-year actual survivals for group I are 75% and 50% and 87.5% and 81.3 for group II. One patient in group I who was in extremis and 3 in group II died at less than 90 days. Group II early deaths had donor risk factor combinations of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and long distance. Freedom from new graft coronary artery disease was 100% at 2 years in group I and 87.5% in group II. CONCLUSIONS: Selective use of donor hearts with coronary artery disease is acceptable. Early deaths are related to recipient factors as well as associated donor risk factors. Donor hearts with mild or moderate coronary artery disease and preserved function on echocardiogram can be used but may require revascularization with recipient conduit and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary artery angioplasty. Coronary disease in donor hearts requires grading and does not categorically preclude use, particularly in risk-matched recipients.

Support with the BVS 5000 assist device during treatment of acute giant-cell myocarditis.

Giant-cell myocarditis is a rare and aggressive form of myocarditis with a high mortality rate. Our purpose is to summarize 3 cases of acute giant-cell myocarditis that illustrate possible outcomes with mechanical support. We reviewed the cases of 3 patients, aged 39 to 59 years, who had giant-cell myocarditis (confirmed by myocardial biopsy). The indication for ventricular assist was circulatory failure despite maximal medical treatment with 2 or more inotropic agents and intraaortic balloon pump support. Immunosuppression and a biventricular mechanical assist (BVS 5000) were used to treat all these patients. The mean duration of mechanical support was 15.7 days (range, 10 to 19 days). One patient had recovery of myocardial function and was weaned from mechanical support. This case is, to our knowledge, the first reported of ventricular support leading to cardiac recovery after diagnosis of giant-cell myocarditis. The 2nd patient was not a candidate for further surgery and died of multisystem organ failure. The 3rd patient underwent orthotopic heart transplantation after 18 days of support and was discharged. We conclude that patients with giant-cell myocarditis tend to have biventricular involvement and can recover myocardial function on mechanical support and immunosuppression. If recovery is not observed, transplantation is warranted. By avoiding left ventricular cannulation, the BVS 5000 is well suited for bridging to recovery, transplantation, or long-term support.

Use of two recipient lists for adults requiring heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: An alternate (second) adult recipient list was used to match excluded potential recipients with nonstandard donor hearts that would otherwise be unused. METHODS: The only absolute criterion for entering the alternate recipient list was age: 65 years old before 1998 and 70 years old after that. Group I consisted of alternates who underwent transplantation, and group II consisted of 401 contemporaneous recipients. Hearts were first offered to regularly listed patients. At least one of the following donor risks accounted for allocation to an alternate: coronary artery disease, reused transplanted heart, high-risk behavior, hepatitis seropositivity, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, high inotropic requirement, left ventricular hypertrophy, age older than 55 years plus another risk, and small donor with no other matches. RESULTS: Of 102 alternates, 82 were listed were because of age. After a median wait of 107 days, 62 alternates underwent transplantation. Median alternate recipient age was 67 years (vs 54 years, P <.001). Median donor age was 45 years (vs 31 years, P <.001). Survival for alternates at 90 days was 82% (vs 91%, P =.04). Significant recipient predictors of early mortality on multivariable analysis (n = 463) were previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio 2.74, 95% confidence interval 1.37-5.48) and renal dysfunction (odds ratio 1.39, 1.10-176). Alternate listing did not independently predict early or late mortality. Late (>90 days) death rates per 1000 person-months were 4.3 and 3.6 for groups I and II (relative risk 1.2, 0.62-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: Use of two adult recipient lists facilitated allocation of unused donor organs. Satisfactory long-term survival supports the use of an alternate recipient list.

Seventeen-year experience with 1,083 heart transplants at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation is the most accepted treatment for end-stage heart disease. A review of 1,083 consecutive transplants (1984 to 2001) was undertaken. METHODS: Adult recipients were divided into quartiles. The last 540 transplants were combined. Three eras were created from these, 1984 to 1991, 1991 to 1995, and 1995 to 2001, with three age groups: 0 to 18 years, 19 to 61 years, and 62 to 74 years. All patients have at least 1 year of follow-up time. End points were survival, rejection, and graft coronary artery disease. RESULTS: There were 1,012 patients. Donor age, graft ischemic time, and the proportion of elderly recipients and nonstandard donor hearts have increased in the current era. Actuarial 60-month survivals of recipients after 1995 were 80.7% (0 to 18 years); 75.3% (19 to 61 years); and 76.2% (>62 years). The current era children and younger adult groups demonstrated improved results when compared with previous eras (p = 0.003 and p = 0.05). Rejection episodes equal to or greater than ISHLT grade 3A per person per year improved to 0.15 in the current era (p < 0.001). During the three eras, older recipients (>62 years) demonstrated fewer episodes of rejection when compared with other adults (0.13 versus 0.58, p = 0.03). Deaths attributed to graft coronary artery disease decreased from 11% to 5% from era 2 to era 3. Regression analysis revealed a mild effect of donor age on survival and graft coronary artery disease (hazard ratio = 1.02, p = 0.001; hazard ratio = 1.039, p < 0.001, respectively). Recipient predictors of graft coronary artery disease were diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio = 1.6, p = 0.014) and congenital heart disease (hazard ratio = 3.41, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival in the current era may be attributed to better organ preservation, improved immunosuppression and control of infection, and less life-threatening graft coronary artery disease.

Short-term bridge to heart transplant using the BVS 5000 external ventricular assist device.

From January 1995 to April 2001, 71 patients with cardiogenic shock using the BVS 5000 were treated or accepted in transfer. Of the 24 transplanted, nine had dilated cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy, acute myocardial infarction, giant cell myocarditis and previous Fontan procedure (group I, n = 13). The others had postcardiotomy shock (group II, n = 11); seven were transferred to our center after device implantation. Age ranged from 8 to 67 years. Ten (77%) patients in group I were implanted without cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean duration of support was 6.7 (2-24) d. Twelve patients were extubated before transplantation and 13 (five in group I, eight in group II) received nonstandard donor organs. Survival to discharge and 1-year actuarial survival was 85 and 77% for group I and 73 and 64% for group II, respectively. Patients with post-implant serum bilirubin levels > 10 mg/dL had a tendency to expire from multiple systemic organ failure. Patients not ventilator-dependent at the time of transplant had the best outcomes. Short-term bridge to transplantation using the BVS 5000 is feasible in selected patients. Caution is recommended when directing such patients to transplant if they need ventilator support and have high serum bilirubin levels.

Use of assist devices and ECMO to bridge pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy to transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsatile ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used to bridge adults with end-stage heart disease to transplantation. A combination of external implantable pulsatile and continuous-flow external mechanical support now can be used to bridge pediatric patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). METHODS: We reviewed consecutive pediatric patients with cardiomyopathy (n = 28) who required mechanical cardiac support from July 1995 to February 2001. All were OHT candidates with severe hemodynamic compromise despite maximal medical support. We excluded from this series patients who had undergone cardiotomy. RESULTS: Nineteen patients received support from external continuous-flow devices, either with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or with centrifugal VADs, and 9 patients received pulsatile support. Nineteen of 28 (68%) patients were successfully bridged to transplant (17) or weaned (2) from their devices after recovery. Of the patients successfully bridged to transplant or recovery, 89% are alive to date. Univariate analysis revealed that a lower bilirubin concentration after 2 days of support was associated with a favorable outcome (p = 0.006). As expected, the patients with pulsatile VADs had significantly higher rates of extubation and oral feeding. CONCLUSION: Pulsatile and continuous-flow devices can complement each other to significantly extend the lives of a wide range of pediatric patients with severe cardiomyopathies.

Recent trends in early outcome of adult patients after heart transplantation: a single-institution review of 251 transplants using standard donor organs.

Older age, prior transplantation, pulmonary hypertension, and mechanical support are commonly seen in current potential cardiac transplant recipients. Transplants in 436 consecutive adult patients from 1994 to 1999 were reviewed. There were 251 using standard donors in 243 patients (age range 18-69 years). To emphasize recipient risk, 185 patients who received a nonstandard donor were excluded from analysis. The indications for transplant were ischemic heart disease (n = 123, 47%), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 82, 32%), and others (n=56, 21%). One hundred and forty-nine (57%) recipients were listed as status I; 5 and 6% were supported with an intra-aortic balloon and an assist device, respectively. The 30-d survival and survival to discharge were 94.7 and 92.7%, respectively; 1-year survival was 89.1%. Causes of early death were graft failure (n = 6), infection (n = 4), stroke (n = 4), multiorgan failure (n = 3) and rejection (n = 2). Predictors were balloon pump use alone (OR= 11.4, p =0.002), pulmonary vascular resistance > 4 Wood units (OR = 5.7, p = 0.007), pretransplant creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (OR = 6.9, p = 0.004) and female donor (OR = 8.3, p = 0.002). Recipient age and previous surgery did not affect short-term survival. Heart transplantation in the current era consistently offers excellent early and 1-year survival for well-selected recipients receiving standard donors. Early mortality tends to reflect graft failure while hospital mortality may be more indicative of recipient selection.

Hepatitis C-positive donors in heart transplantation.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be transmitted to heart transplant recipients by donor organs. Mid-term results were reported using HCV-positive donors in patients at risk of imminent death (group I, n = 10), or in patients who otherwise would not have been offered heart transplantation (group II, n = 10) because of age (9/10) or associated medical risk (1/10). Medical records pertaining to patients receiving HCV-positive allografts between July 1994 and December 1999 were reviewed. The recipients consisted of 19 males and one female, with a median age of 54 years for group I and 66 for group II. The HCV RNA level, seroconversion of anti-HCV antibody, biochemical liver dysfunction, and causes of death were examined. Older recipients received reduced immunosuppression. Two patients in group II were HCV positive and were also retransplants. The hospital mortality rate was 10% in group I and 20% in group II; both hepatitis C-positive recipients died postoperatively prior to discharge. All predischarge deaths were related to multi-system organ failure (MSOF). All 17 survivors were HCV negative prior to transplant. Of these, 4/17 seroconverted. HCV RNA was detected in two of them. At a median follow-up of 26.4 months, 2/11 current survivors continue to test anti-HCV positive and are RNA negative. Three-year actual survival was 40% for group I and 70% in group II. Transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) accounted for one postoperative death in group I. Current data show that four out of 11 survivors had developed TCAD at 3-year follow-up, yielding an actual freedom from TCAD rate of 12/17 (70%) at 3-year follow-up. Hepatitis C transmission using a donor heart as the reservoir is moderate (25%). Limited use of such donors is justified in selected patients. The risk for hepatic disease may be reduced by tailoring immunosuppression specifically for such recipients, particularly if they are at low risk of rejection. Further studies are necessary to define a possible association between HCV and TCAD.

Use of hearts transplanted from donors with atraumatic intracranial bleeds.

BACKGROUND: Donor atraumatic intracranial bleed (aICB) is associated with older age and may reflect a history of hypertension. Hearts from donors who died of aICB may be at increased risk for graft failure because of the associated catecholamine surge. We evaluated whether receiving a heart from a donor who had an aICB independently affected the outcome of transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed adult patients (>18 years) who underwent heart transplantation between July 1994 and December 1999. We excluded patients who received non-standard hearts (e.g., donor age >55 years). Group 1 received hearts from donors with aICB (n = 80), and Group 2 received hearts from donors who did not have aICB (n = 171). RESULTS: Recipient age, gender, United Network for Organ Sharing status, and indication for transplantation were similar for both groups. Donors in Group 1 were older (41 vs 26 years, p = 0.001), more commonly women (55% vs 20%, p = 0.001), and more often had history of hypertension (26% vs 2%, p = 0.001). Survival to discharge was 86% in Group 1 and 95% in Group 2. Actuarial 5-year survival was 72% for Group 1 and 81% for Group 2 (p = 0.52). Regression analysis showed that receiving a heart from a donor with aICB was a risk factor for early recipient mortality but not for long-term outcome (odds ratio = 3.25, p = 0.02, and hazard ratio = 1.16, p = 0.69, respectively). Donor aICB, female gender, and abnormal initial echocardiogram (global hypokinesia) were selected as clinically relevant independent risk factors for early mortality of the recipient, using a fitted multifactor logistic regression model (goodness-of-fit chi-square p value = 0.94). Donor age, accident-to-retrieval time interval, and borderline left ventricular hypertrophy did not significantly differ. Five-year freedom from transplant coronary artery disease in Group 1 was 74% (vs 80% in Group 2, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The trend observed in this series suggests that receiving a heart from a donor with aICB is a potential independent risk factor for early mortality after transplantation independent of age. Caution should be used when evaluating such donors, particularly when other risk factors such as female donor or depressed ejection fraction are present.