Cost-effectiveness of 3-months isoniazid and rifapentine compared to 9-months isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review examining the cost effectiveness of a 3-month course of isoniazid and rifapentine, known as 3HP, given by directly observed treatment, compared to 9 months of isoniazid that is directly observed or self-administered, for latent tuberculosis infection. 3HP has shown to be effective in reducing progression to active tuberculosis and like other short-course regimens, has higher treatment completion rates compared to standard regimens such as 9 months of isoniazid. Decision makers would benefit from knowing if the higher up-front costs of rifapentine and of the human resources needed for directly observed treatment are worth the investment for improved outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science up to February 2022 with search concepts combining latent tuberculosis infection, directly observed treatment, and cost or cost-effectiveness. Studies included were in English or French, on human subjects, with latent tuberculosis infection, provided information on specified anti-tubercular therapy regimens, had a directly observed treatment arm, and described outcomes with some cost or economic data. We excluded posters and abstracts, treatment for multiple drug resistant tuberculosis, and combined testing and treatment strategies. We then restricted our findings to studies examining directly-observed 3HP for comparison. The primary outcome was the cost and cost-effectiveness of directly-observed 3HP. RESULTS: We identified 3 costing studies and 7 cost-effectiveness studies. The 3 costing studies compared directly-observed 3HP to directly-observed 9 months of isoniazid. Of the 7 cost-effectiveness studies, 4 were modelling studies based in high-income countries; one study was modelled on a high tuberculosis incidence population in the Canadian Arctic, using empiric costing data from that setting; and 2 studies were conducted in a low-income, high HIV-coinfection rate population. In five studies, directly-observed 3HP compared to self-administered isoniazid for 9 months in high-income countries, has incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that range from cost-saving to $5418 USD/QALY gained. While limited, existing evidence suggests 3HP may not be cost-effective in low-income, high HIV-coinfection settings. CONCLUSION: Cost-effectiveness should continue to be assessed for programmatic planning and scale-up, and may vary depending on existing systems and local context, including prevalence rates and patient expectations and preferences.

Effect of implementation of a 12-dose once-weekly treatment (3HP) in addition to standard regimens to prevent TB on completion rates: Interrupted time series design.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine if offering a 12-dose once-weekly treatment (3HP) as an additional treatment option would result in an increase in the overall proportion of patients completing TB preventive treatment (TPT) above the baseline rate. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes in consecutive adults referred to a TB clinic from January 2010 to May 2019. Starting December 2016, 3HP was offered as an alternative to standard clinic regimens which included 9 months of daily isoniazid or 4 months of daily rifampin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed TPT among all patients who started treatment. Using segmented autoregression analysis, we compared completion at the end of the study with projected completion had the intervention not been introduced. RESULTS: A total of 2803 adults were referred for assessment over the study period. There was an absolute increase in completions among those who started a treatment of 19.0% at the end of the study between the observed intervention completion rate and the projected completion rate from the baseline study period (the completion rate had the 3HP intervention not been introduced) (76% observed vs 57% projected; 95% CI 6.6 to 31.4%; p = 0.004) and an absolute increase among those who were offered treatment (17.3%; 95% CI, 2.3 to 32.3%; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of 3HP for TPT as an alternative to the regular regimens offered resulted in a significant increase in the proportion of patients completing treatment. Our study provides evidence to support accelerated use of 3HP in Canada.