Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mar Drugs ; 18(12)2020 Dec 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33287439

RESUMO

With the move away from use of mouse bioassay (MBA) to test bivalve mollusc shellfish for paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, countries around the world are having to adopt non-animal-based alternatives that fulfil ethical and legal requirements. Various assays have been developed which have been subjected to single-laboratory and multi-laboratory validation studies, gaining acceptance as official methods of analysis and approval for use in some countries as official control testing methods. The majority of validation studies conducted to date do not, however, incorporate shellfish species sourced from Latin America. Consequently, this study sought to investigate the performance of five alternative PSP testing methods together with the MBA, comparing the PSP toxin data generated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The methods included a receptor binding assay (RBA), two liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FLD) methods including both pre-column and post-column oxidation, liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and a commercial lateral flow assay (LFA) from Scotia. A total of three hundred and forty-nine shellfish samples from Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Uruguay were assessed. For the majority of samples, qualitative results compared well between methods. Good statistical correlations were demonstrated between the majority of quantitative results, with a notably excellent correlation between the current EU reference method using pre-column oxidation LC-FLD and LC-MS/MS. The LFA showed great potential for qualitative determination of PSP toxins, although the findings of high numbers of false-positive results and two false negatives highlighted that some caution is still needed when interpreting results. This study demonstrated that effective replacement methods are available for countries that no longer wish to use the MBA, but highlighted the importance of comparing toxin data from the replacement method using local shellfish species of concern before implementing new methods in official control testing programs.


Assuntos
Toxinas Marinhas/química , Toxinas Marinhas/toxicidade , Paralisia/induzido quimicamente , Intoxicação por Frutos do Mar/diagnóstico , Frutos do Mar/análise , Testes de Toxicidade/normas , Animais , Bioensaio , Bivalves , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Reações Falso-Positivas , América Latina , Camundongos , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
2.
Toxicon ; 148: 155-164, 2018 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29705148

RESUMO

A receptor binding assay (RBA) for the determination of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxicity is formally validated through collaborative study and approved for regulatory monitoring use in the US for mussels and clams. However, to date, the method has not been tested on bivalve molluscs originating from European waters and no validation studies have been conducted for oysters, a shellfish species of great importance globally. This study firstly reports the work conducted to assess the performance of the assay in comparison with a regulatory chemical detection method for a range of shellfish species originating from Great Britain. Data obtained showed a complete absence of false negative RBA results, with a tendency to over-estimate PSP toxicity for some shellfish species in comparison with liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Secondly, the performance of the RBA was assessed for oysters, with the analysis of a dilution series of oyster matrix certified reference materials. Method trueness, sensitivity and precision were found to compare well with results reported previously for other species. In addition, the RBA analysis of untreated and demetallated oyster extracts, provided good evidence that the RBA is not suppressed in the presence of high concentrations of zinc as reported previously for the mouse bioassay. Consequently, there is strong evidence from this study, that the RBA would be suitable for determination of PSP toxicity in bivalve molluscs from GB, with acceptable method performance in oysters. Further validation studies would be required for other shellfish species of interest before the method can be considered suitable for implementation in Europe.


Assuntos
Bioensaio , Bivalves/química , Toxinas Marinhas/análise , Animais , Ostreidae/química , Ratos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Saxitoxina/análogos & derivados , Saxitoxina/análise , Frutos do Mar/análise , Intoxicação por Frutos do Mar , Reino Unido , Zinco/química
3.
Mar Drugs ; 16(1)2018 Jan 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342840

RESUMO

Marine biotoxin-contaminated seafood has caused thousands of poisonings worldwide this century. Given these threats, there is an increasing need for improved technologies that can be easily integrated into coastal monitoring programs. This study evaluates approaches for monitoring toxins associated with recurrent toxin-producing Alexandrium and Dinophysis blooms on Long Island, NY, USA, which cause paralytic and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (PSP and DSP), respectively. Within contrasting locations, the dynamics of pelagic Alexandrium and Dinophysis cell densities, toxins in plankton, and toxins in deployed blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) were compared with passive solid-phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT) samplers filled with two types of resin, HP20 and XAD-2. Multiple species of wild shellfish were also collected during Dinophysis blooms and used to compare toxin content using two different extraction techniques (single dispersive and double exhaustive) and two different toxin analysis assays (liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and the protein phosphatase inhibition assay (PP2A)) for the measurement of DSP toxins. DSP toxins measured in the HP20 resin were significantly correlated (R² = 0.7-0.9, p < 0.001) with total DSP toxins in shellfish, but were detected more than three weeks prior to detection in deployed mussels. Both resins adsorbed measurable levels of PSP toxins, but neither quantitatively tracked Alexandrium cell densities, toxicity in plankton or toxins in shellfish. DSP extraction and toxin analysis methods did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), were highly correlated (R² = 0.98-0.99; p < 0.001) and provided complete recovery of DSP toxins from standard reference materials. Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and ribbed mussels (Geukensia demissa) were found to accumulate DSP toxins above federal and international standards (160 ng g-1) during Dinophysis blooms while Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and soft shell clams (Mya arenaria) did not. This study demonstrated that SPATT samplers using HP20 resin coupled with PP2A technology could be used to provide early warning of DSP, but not PSP, events for shellfish management.


Assuntos
Dinoflagellida/química , Toxinas Marinhas/química , Frutos do Mar/análise , Frutos do Mar/parasitologia , Animais , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Monitoramento Ambiental/métodos , Mytilus edulis/parasitologia , Alimentos Marinhos/análise , Alimentos Marinhos/parasitologia , Água do Mar/parasitologia , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA