Discontinuation of denosumab in men with prostate cancer.

In patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer, treated with radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy for 3 years and DMAB on average for 5 years, BMD was in the normal or osteopenic range. Discontinuation of DMAB led to a bone loss of 2-5%. In men with osteopenia, the bone loss was prevented by zoledronate. PURPOSE: Patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are treated with denosumab (DMAB) to prevent fractures and preserve bone mass. We wanted to investigate the change in BMD in men with non-metastatic prostate cancer discontinuing DMAB. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on medical records from patients referred to the Department of Endocrinology from the Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2021. We retrieved information on biochemistry and DXA performed 0-6 months after the last DMAB injection and a second DXA performed approximately 12 months after the first. In case of a BMD T-score ≤ - 1 at the lumbar spine or total hip at the first DXA, the patients were treated with zoledronate. The primary endpoint was change in lumbar spine BMD. RESULTS: We included 50 patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. The mean DMAB treatment duration was 5 ± 0.1 years. Among the patients treated with zoledronate (n = 9), BMD was maintained at the spine and femoral neck after a mean of 16 months. We found a significant decrease in BMD; - 4.9 ± 4.2%, - 1.9 ± 3.5%, and - 2.4 ± 3.6% at the spine, total hip, and femoral neck between the first and second DXA in the patients not treated with zoledronate (n = 24) (p ≤ 0.01 for all). One patient who did not receive ZOL sustained multiple fragility vertebral fractures after DMAB discontinuation. CONCLUSION: In men with non-metastatic prostate cancer, discontinuation of DMAB after stopping ADT led to an average bone loss of 2-5%. Zoledronate prevented bone loss in men with osteopenia.

Non-parathyroid hypercalcemia associated with paraffin oil injection in 12 younger male bodybuilders: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: Injection of paraffin oil to augment muscles size is a troubling phenomenon known to cause a foreign body reaction with formation of granulomas. In a few case reports, long-term side effects have been reported in terms of hypercalcemia and renal failure. METHODS: We identified a case series of 12 male bodybuilders presenting with non-parathyroid hypercalcemia who previously had injected paraffin oil to increase muscles size. RESULTS: At admission, all patients had moderate-to-severe hypercalcemia with suppressed PTH levels and impaired renal function. Calcitriol levels were within the normal range or slightly elevated. Follow-up measurements showed marked hypercalciuria with nearly normal levels of bone turnover markers. A correlation was found between levels of peptidyl dipeptidase and calcitriol (R = 0.812, P = 0.050). Treatment with antiresorptive agents seemed less effective than glucocorticoids, which resulted in a significantly lowering of ionized calcium levels and improved renal function, although no patients were cured by this treatment. Immunosuppression with azathioprine or mycophenolate may have a glucocorticoid-saving effect. One patient had surgery with removal of affected muscle tissue, without any apparent effect on plasma calcium levels. CONCLUSION: The hypercalcemia and associated hypercalciuria seems to be due to an intestinal hyperabsorption of calcium. It remains to be elucidated, whether an increased calcitriol synthesis within granulomas is the only (main) mechanism by which intestinal calcium absorption is increased. Glucocorticoids seem most appropriate as the first choice for treatment. Bodybuilders should be warned against use of intramuscular oil injections (and other substances), as this may have severe adverse health consequences.