First-in-Human Evaluation of Site-Specifically Labeled 89Zr-Pertuzumab in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Radioimmunoconjugates targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have shown potential to noninvasively visualize HER2-positive tumors. However, the stochastic approach that has been traditionally used to radiolabel these antibodies yields poorly defined and heterogeneous products with suboptimal in vivo performance. Here, we describe a first-in-human PET study on patients with HER2-positive breast cancer evaluating the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 89Zr-site-specific (ss)-pertuzumab PET, a site-specifically labeled radioimmunoconjugate designed to circumvent the limitations of random stochastic lysine labeling. Methods: Six patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial. Pertuzumab was site-specifically modified with desferrioxamine (DFO) via a novel chemoenzymatic strategy and subsequently labeled with 89Zr. Patients were administered 74 MBq of 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab in 20 mg of total antibody intravenously and underwent PET/CT at 1 d, 3-4 d, and 5-8 d after injection. PET imaging, whole-body probe counts, and blood draws were performed to assess the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and dosimetry. Results: 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab PET/CT was used to assess HER2 status and heterogeneity to guide biopsy and decide the next line of treatment at progression. The radioimmunoconjugate was able to detect known sites of malignancy, suggesting that these tumor lesions were HER2-positive. The optimal imaging time point was 5-8 d after administration, and no toxicities were observed. Dosimetry estimates from OLINDA showed that the organs receiving the highest doses (mean ± SD) were kidney (1.8 ± 0.5 mGy/MBq), liver (1.7 ± 0.3 mGy/MBq), and heart wall (1.2 ± 0.1 mGy/MBq). The average effective dose for 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab was 0.54 ± 0.03 mSv/MBq, which was comparable to both stochastically lysine-labeled 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab and 89Zr-DFO-trastuzumab. One patient underwent PET/CT with both 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab and 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab 1 mo apart, with 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab demonstrating improved lesion detection and higher tracer avidity. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the safety, dosimetry, and potential clinical applications of 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab PET/CT. 89Zr-ss-pertuzumab may detect more lesions than 89Zr-DFO-pertuzumab. Potential clinical applications include real-time evaluation of HER2 status to guide biopsy and assist in treatment decisions.

Quality Care in Survivorship: Lessons Learned From the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

PURPOSE: The ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) project was established to evaluate the influence of guideline recommendations on routine clinical practice. METHODS: QOPI provided summary data from 839 unique practices in which data were collected every six months from the Fall of 2015 to the Spring of 2019. From these data, six items were chosen based on their relationship to domains of survivorship. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to test for trends in QOPI measures adherence rates over time. The models were adjusted for the time period, region, practice-ownership, multispecialty site, fellowship program, and hospital type. RESULTS: Smoking cessation counseling recommended and smoking cessation counseling administered or referred both increased over time, 50%-61% (adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR), 1.028; 95% CI, 1.016 to 1.040; P < .001) and 34%-49% (adjusted IRR, 1.052; 95% CI, 1.035 to 1.070; P < .001), respectively. Infertility risks discussed before chemotherapy increased from 36% to 53% (adjusted IRR, 1.056; 95% CI, 1.035 to 1.078; P < .001) and fertility options discussed or referred to specialists increased from 23% to 38% (adjusted IRR, 1.074; 95% CI, 1.046 to 1.102; P < .001). Twenty-nine percent documented a positron emission tomography, computed tomography, or bone scan within the first 12 months for women diagnosed with early breast cancer treated for curative intent (adjusted IRR, 1.000; 95% CI, 0.977 to 1.024; P = .971). Tumor marker surveillance within 12 months increased from 78% to 87% (adjusted IRR, 1.018; 95% CI, 1.002 to 1.033; P = .023). CONCLUSION: As scientific evidence to guide cancer survivorship care grows, the role of guideline recommendations permeating clinical practice using quality metrics will become increasingly important.

Improving Adherence to Endocrine Therapy in Women With HR-Positive Breast Cancer.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the standard treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. One of the most common side effects of AIs is joint pain; it is also the most frequently cited reason for nonadherence and discontinuation before completion of the prescribed treatment course. Nonadherence and, in particular, discontinuation, can lead to increased rates of breast cancer mortality. The prevalence of AI-induced arthralgias is about 50%, and there are several interventions, including switching to a different AI, that can increase adherence. The healthcare professional plays a part in fostering adherence by communicating the side effects of AIs to patients before the initiation of treatment, as well as explaining the strategies for addressing these side effects, should they occur.

The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy.

OBJECTIVE AND SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There remains variation in the use of radiation therapy (RT) in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), despite prospective randomized trials documenting its benefit in reducing the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). METHODS: Patients with DCIS treated with excision alone or excision plus RT from 1991 to 1995 were identified. Margin width, number of involved ducts at closest margin, age, presence of palpable mass, presence of lobular neoplasia, nuclear grade, and necrosis were tested in uni- and multivariate analysis for association with risk of IBTR and added value of RT. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with a median follow-up of 11 years had actuarial 10- and 15-year overall IBTR rates of 22% and 29%, respectively. For lesions excised with margins of <1 mm, 1 to 9 mm, and >or=10 mm, the actuarial 10-year IBTR rates were 28%, 21%, and 19%, respectively. RT reduced adjusted IBTR rates by 62% (P = 0.002) for all patients; 83% for lesions with <1 mm margins (P = 0.002), 70% for 1 to 9 mm (P = 0.05), and 24% (P = 0.55) for >or=10 mm. After adjustment for other variables, higher volume of disease near the margin was associated with risk of IBTR in the no RT group (HR = 3.37, P = 0.002) and greater benefit of RT (HR 0.14; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Effect of RT on IBTR risk is influenced by both margin width and number of involved ducts at nearest margin. Patients with higher volume of disease near the margin derive a greater benefit from the addition of RT. Despite margins of >or=10 mm, the risk of IBTR remains substantial in patients with DCIS.

Concurrent lobular neoplasia increases the risk of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: Multiple clinicopathologic factors have been analyzed for their association with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after women receive breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The reported incidence of proliferative lesions, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), columnar cell changes (CCC), and lobular neoplasia associated with breast cancer, has been as high as 23%; however, the relevance of these lesions on the natural history of DCIS and the risk of IBTR remains unknown. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-four patients with DCIS who received BCT between 1991 and 1995 were identified from the authors' institutional database. Slides were reviewed by a dedicated breast pathologist with particular attention to the presence of lobular neoplasia, ADH, and CCC. The actuarial 5-, 10-, and 15-year IBTR rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Concurrent lobular neoplasia was present in 41 of 294 patients (14%), ADH was present in 37 of 294 patients (13%), and CCC was present in 71 of 294 patients (24%). The median follow-up was 11 years. IBTR occurred in 40 of 227 patients without lobular neoplasia (18%) versus 15 of 41 patients with lobular neoplasia (37%; P=.005; hazard ratio [HR], 2.49). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative incidence rates of IBTR were twice as high in women who had DCIS and lobular neoplasia compared with women who had DCIS alone (P=.002). Concomitant ADH (HR, 1.53) and CCC (HR, 1.24) were not associated significantly with IBTR (P=.20 and P=.44, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent lobular neoplasia is associated with a significantly higher risk of IBTR in women with DCIS who received BCT. Women with coexisting DCIS and lobular neoplasia who receive BCT should consider using additional risk-reducing strategies.

Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: patient perceptions and precautionary behaviors.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. This study was undertaken to examine patient perceptions of lymphedema and use of precautionary behaviors several years after axillary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred thirty-six women who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone or SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND) between June 1, 1999, and May 30, 2003, were evaluated at a median of 5 years after surgery. Patient-perceived lymphedema and avoidant behaviors were assessed through interview and administered a validated instrument, and compared with arm measurements. RESULTS: Current arm swelling was reported in 3% of patients who received SLNB alone versus 27% of patients who received SLNB/ALND (P < .0001), as compared with 5% and 16%, respectively, with measured lymphedema. Only 41% of patients reporting arm swelling had measured lymphedema, and 5% of patients reporting no arm swelling had measured lymphedema. Risk factors associated with reported arm swelling were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher body mass index (P < .0001), infection (P < .0001), and injury (P = .007) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. Patients followed more precautions if they had measured or perceived lymphedema. CONCLUSION: Body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for perceiving lymphedema. There is significant discordance between the presence of measured and patient-perceived lymphedema. When compared to SLNB/ALND, SLNB-alone results in a significantly lower rate of patient-perceived arm swelling 5 years postoperatively, and is perceived by fewer women than are measured to have it.

Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements.

PURPOSE: Sentinel lymph node biopsy was adopted for the staging of the axilla with the assumption that it would reduce the risk of lymphedema in women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term prevalence of lymphedema after SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone and after SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (SLNB/ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: At median follow-up of 5 years, lymphedema was assessed in 936 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB alone or SLNB/ALND. Standardized ipsilateral and contralateral measurements at baseline and follow-up were used to determine change in ipsilateral upper extremity circumference and to control for baseline asymmetry and weight change. Associations between lymphedema and potential risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Of the 936 women, 600 women (64%) underwent SLNB alone and 336 women (36%) underwent SLNB/ALND. Patients having SLNB alone were older than those having SLNB/ALND (56 v 52 years; P < .0001). Baseline body mass index (BMI) was similar in both groups. Arm circumference measurements documented lymphedema in 5% of SLNB alone patients, compared with 16% of SLNB/ALND patients (P < .0001). Risk factors associated with measured lymphedema were greater body weight (P < .0001), higher BMI (P < .0001), and infection (P < .0001) or injury (P = .02) in the ipsilateral arm since surgery. CONCLUSION: When compared with SLNB/ALND, SLNB alone results in a significantly lower rate of lymphedema 5 years postoperatively. However, even after SLNB alone, there remains a clinically relevant risk of lymphedema. Higher body weight, infection, and injury are significant risk factors for developing lymphedema.