Switching from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Biological Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Remains a Challenge.

Biological inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications, once limited to intravenous (IV) administration, can now be administered both via IV and subcutaneously (SC). This study investigates patient preferences, willingness to switch from IV to SC, and associated factors. A questionnaire covering demographics, disease-related inquiries, quality of life, and IBD medication preferences was distributed via email, the Israeli Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Foundation, infusion centers, and clinics. From 454 IBD patients (median age: 42 years; 55.7% female), responses revealed a preference for SC every 8 weeks, which is comparable to daily oral dosing. Both options were significantly favored over IV every 8 weeks and SC every 2 weeks, with no statistically significant differences between the latter two. However, among patients who were experienced with both SC and IV administration, a clear preference for SC administration every 2 weeks over IV every 8 weeks surfaced. Among IV-treated patients, 54.5% resisted switching to SC. Key reasons for this included medical staff presence (57.7%), a fear of needles (46.4%), belief in infusion efficacy (37.1%), and longer intervals between infusions (36.1%). Findings suggest that transitioning from IV to SC treatment is challenging due to patient resistance, which is influenced by specific factors. Identifying and addressing these obstacles is crucial for optimizing IBD management.

Parental perspectives on pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Unraveling concerns, and study participation willingness.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of disease burden extends beyond pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients to include their parents. Previous studies, predating the biologic era, have highlighted parental concerns about potential side effects associated with IBD medications. However, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding parents' perceptions of clinical studies involving pediatric IBD patients. This study aims to explore the specific concerns troubling parents of children with IBD, identifying factors influencing these concerns, and assesses parental willingness to allow their child's participation in clinical studies. METHODS: Utilizing social media, we disseminated an anonymous questionnaire to parents of pediatric IBD patients. The questionnaire encompassed queries about parental willingness for their child to partake in clinical studies, aspects of the disease deemed bothersome, and the sense of coherence scale (SOC). RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 101 parents, with a mean age of 46.4, of whom 82.2% were female. Concerns about potential future side effects of their child's medications surpassed worries about disease symptoms (80.04% vs. 73.47%). Linear regression analysis revealed that parents with lower SOC scores, limited medical care accessibility, and a higher age of the child at diagnosis, exhibited heightened concerns about the future impact of the disease on their child (p = 0.016, 0.003, and 0.045, respectively). While a majority rejected participation in studies involving new medications (54.5%), there was greater agreement for studies on nutritional therapies (84.2%) and complementary medicine (91.1%). Classification tree analysis indicated that women were more inclined to permit their child's participation in studies focusing on complementary medicine (adjusted p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Parents of IBD patients express greater apprehension about potential side effects from IBD medications and display reluctance toward their child participating in clinical studies related to medications.