The Risk of Lung Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate lung cancer risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and RA-interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study of RA and RA-ILD within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) between 2000 and 2019. Patients with RA and RA-ILD were identified with validated administrative-based algorithms, then matched (up to 1:10) on age, gender, and VA enrollment year to individuals without RA. Lung cancers were identified from a VA oncology database and the National Death Index. Conditional Cox regression models assessed lung cancer risk adjusting for race, ethnicity, smoking status, Agent Orange exposure, and comorbidity burden among matched individuals. Several sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: We matched 72,795 patients with RA with 633,937 patients without RA (mean age 63 years; 88% male). Over 4,481,323 patient-years, 17,099 incident lung cancers occurred. RA was independently associated with an increased lung cancer risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.58 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-1.64]), which persisted in never smokers (aHR 1.65 [95% CI 1.22-2.24]) and in those with incident RA (aHR 1.54 [95% CI 1.44-1.65]). Compared to non-RA controls, prevalent RA-ILD (n = 757) was more strongly associated with lung cancer risk (aHR 3.25 [95% CI 2.13-4.95]) than RA without ILD (aHR 1.57 [95% CI 1.51-1.64]). Analyses of both prevalent and incident RA-ILD produced similar results (RA-ILD vs non-RA aHR 2.88 [95% CI 2.45-3.40]). CONCLUSION: RA was associated with a >50% increased risk of lung cancer, and those with RA-ILD represented a particularly high-risk group with an approximate three-fold increased risk. Increased lung cancer surveillance in RA, and especially RA-ILD, may be a useful strategy for reducing the burden posed by the leading cause of cancer death.

Management of ruptured ovarian teratoma mimicking advanced ovarian cancer.

•Chronic chemical peritonitis caused by spontaneous rupture of a mature cystic teratoma may result in prolonged hospitalization and respiratory decline and can mimic a gynecologic malignancy.•Earlier surgical intervention for mature teratoma may prevent morbidity.•Inclusion of a gynecologic oncologist is advised for management discussions and/or surgical back-up.•Complex benign gynecologic surgeries may have some benefit for gynecologic oncologic trainees, which can be used for later oncologic cases.

Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget's disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.

Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) and Its Role in Gynecologic Malignancies.

OPINION STATEMENT: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) refers to small fragments of DNA released into the bloodstream by cancer cells. It is obtained through "liquid biopsy;" which most commonly refers to plasma or blood samples, but can be obtained from a number of bodily fluids including ascitic fluid, saliva, and even urine and stool. ctDNA is detected via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The DNA from these samples is analyzed for the detection of point mutations, copy-number alterations, gene fusion, and DNA methylation. These results have the potential for use in cancer diagnosis, determining prognosis, targeting gene-specific therapies, and monitoring for/predicting disease recurrence and response to treatment. ctDNA offers an alternative to tissue biopsy; it is less invasive and can be monitored serially over time without multiple procedures. Moreover it may have the ability to detect disease recurrence or predict behavior in a way that solid tissue biopsies, tumor marker surveillance, and imaging cannot. Recent explosion in interest in ctDNA shows promising developments for widespread adoption of these techniques in cancer care. However, the use of ctDNA in diagnosis and treatment of gynecologic malignancies is currently limited, compared to adoption in other solid-organ tumors such as breast and colorectal cancers. Compared to other cancer types, there appear to be fewer comprehensive studies and clinical validations specifically focusing on the use of ctDNA in gynecologic cancers. More research is needed in this area to advance the potential for use of ctDNA in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers before this can be routinely adopted to improve care for patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice.

We aimed to examine the preparedness of recent gynecologic oncology fellowship graduates for independent practice.We conducted a web-based survey study using REDCap targeting Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members who graduated gynecologic oncology fellowship within the last six years. The survey included 52 items assessing fellowship training experiences, level of comfort in performing core gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and administering cancer-directed therapies. Questions also addressed factors driving participants' selection of fellowship programs, educational experience, research and preparedness for independent practice. A total of 296 participants were invited to complete the survey. Response rate was 42% with n = 124 completed surveys included for analysis. The highest ranked factor for fellowship selection was fit with program 36% (n = 45). Upon completing fellowship, most were uncomfortable performing ureteral conduit formation 84% (n = 103), ureteroneocystostomy 77% (n = 94), exenteration 68% (n = 83), splenectomy 67% (n = 83) and lower anterior resection 41% (n = 51). Most were comfortable managing intraoperative complications 85% (n = 104) and standard cancer staging procedures (range: 61%-99%). Majority were comfortable providing cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy 99% (n = 123), immunotherapy 84% (n = 104), and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors 97% (n = 120). Upon completing fellowship, 77% (n = 95) report having mentorship that met their expectations during fellowship and 94% (n = 116) felt they were ready for independent practice. Majority of fellowship graduates were prepared for independent practice and felt comfortable performing routine surgical procedures and cancer directed treatment. However, most are not comfortable with ultra-radical gynecologic oncology procedures. Maximizing surgical opportunities during fellowship training and acquiring early career mentorship may help.