The Discovery and Development of Thienopyrimidines as Inhibitors of Helicobacter pylori That Act through Inhibition of the Respiratory Complex I.

The successful treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections is becoming increasingly difficult due to the rise of resistance against current broad spectrum triple therapy regimens. In the search for narrow-spectrum agents against H. pylori, a high-throughput screen identified two structurally related thienopyrimidine compounds that selectively inhibited H. pylori over commensal members of the gut microbiota. To develop the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the thienopyrimidines against H. pylori, this study employed four series of modifications in which systematic substitution to the thienopyrimidine core was explored and ultimately side-chain elements optimized from the two original hits were merged into lead compounds. During the development of this series, the mode of action studies identified H. pylori's respiratory complex I subunit NuoD as the target for lead thienopyrimidines. As this enzyme complex is uniquely essential for ATP synthesis in H. pylori, a homology model of the H. pylori NuoB-NuoD binding interface was generated to help rationalize the SAR and guide further development of the series. From these studies, lead compounds emerged with increased potency against H. pylori, improved safety indices, and a good overall pharmacokinetic profile with the exception of high protein binding and poor solubility. Although lead compounds in the series demonstrated efficacy in an ex vivo infection model, the compounds had no efficacy in a mouse model of H. pylori infection. Additional optimization of pharmacological properties of the series to increase solubility and free-drug levels at the sequestered sites of H. pylori infection would potentially result in a gain of in vivo efficacy. The thienopyrimidine series developed in this study demonstrates that NuoB-NuoD of the respiratory complex I can be targeted for development of novel narrow spectrum agents against H. pylori and that thienopyrimines can serve as the basis for future advancement of these studies.

Pharmacodynamics of ClpP-Activating Antibiotic Combinations against Gram-Positive Pathogens.

It is often difficult to cure endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and device-associated infections caused by Gram-positive pathogens, despite therapy with clinically appropriate antibiotics. This may be due to antibiotic tolerance or resistance development. Acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) are a class of bactericidal compounds active against a variety of clinically important Gram-positive bacteria, including staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci. ADEPs activate caseinolytic protease P (ClpP), killing high-density, nondividing cultures of bacteria that are tolerant to approved classes of antibiotics. Acyldepsipeptide analog 4 (ADEP4) was active against a panel of drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens in MIC assays, with no preexisting resistance detected. Killing of stationary-phase cultures was observed when ADEP4 was combined with multiple classes of approved antibiotics. Additionally, a hollow-fiber infection model was used to assess the effects of ADEP4 antibiotic combinations on bacterial killing and resistance development. These studies were performed on high-density cultures of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE). None of the approved antibiotics linezolid, ampicillin, and oxacillin tested alone had bactericidal activity under these conditions. ADEP4 initially caused killing, but regrowth of the culture was apparent within 96 h due to resistance. Combinations of ADEP4 with linezolid or oxacillin caused substantially improved killing of MRSA or MSSA cultures, respectively, and no regrowth due to resistance was observed. The combination of ADEP4 and ampicillin eradicated cultures of VRE to the limit of detection within 52 h. These data suggest that combining ClpP activators with traditional antibiotics may be a good strategy to treat complicated Gram-positive infections.

In Vivo and In Vitro Effects of a ClpP-Activating Antibiotic against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci.

Antibiotics with novel bactericidal mechanisms of action are urgently needed. The antibiotic acyldepsipeptide 4 (ADEP4) activates the ClpP protease and causes cells to self-digest. The effects of ADEP4 and ClpP activation have not been characterized sufficiently for the enterococci, which are important pathogens known for high levels of acquired and intrinsic antibiotic resistance. In the present study, ADEP4 was found to be potently active against both Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, with MIC90s of 0.016 µg/ml and 0.031 µg/ml, respectively. ClpP purified from E. faecium was found to bind ADEP4 in a surface plasmon resonance analysis, and ClpP activation by ADEP4 was demonstrated biochemically with a ß-casein digestion assay. In addition, E. faecium ClpP was crystallized in the presence of ADEP4, revealing ADEP4 binding to ClpP in the activated state. These results confirm that the anti-enterococcal activity of ADEP4 occurs through ClpP activation. In killing curve assays, ADEP4 was found to be bactericidal against stationary-phase vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis (VRE) strain V583, and resistance development was prevented when ADEP4 was combined with multiple classes of approved antibiotics. ADEP4 in combination with partnering antibiotics also eradicated mature VRE biofilms within 72 h of treatment. Biofilm killing with ADEP4 antibiotic combinations was superior to that with the clinically used combinations ampicillin-gentamicin and ampicillin-daptomycin. In a murine peritoneal septicemia model, ADEP4 alone was as effective as ampicillin. ADEP4 coadministered with ampicillin was significantly more effective than either drug alone. These data suggest that ClpP-activating antibiotics may be useful for treating enterococcal infections.

ATP-Dependent Persister Formation in Escherichia coli.

Persisters are dormant variants that form a subpopulation of cells tolerant to antibiotics. Persisters are largely responsible for the recalcitrance of chronic infections to therapy. In Escherichia coli, one widely accepted model of persister formation holds that stochastic accumulation of ppGpp causes activation of the Lon protease that degrades antitoxins; active toxins then inhibit translation, resulting in dormant, drug-tolerant persisters. We found that various stresses induce toxin-antitoxin (TA) expression but that induction of TAs does not necessarily increase persisters. The 16S rRNA promoter rrnB P1 was proposed to be a persister reporter and an indicator of toxin activation regulated by ppGpp. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), we confirmed the enrichment for persisters in the fraction of rrnB P1-gfp dim cells; however, this is independent of toxin-antitoxins. rrnB P1 is coregulated by ppGpp and ATP. We show that rrnB P1 can report persisters in a relA/spoT deletion background, suggesting that rrnB P1 is a persister marker responding to ATP. Consistent with this finding, decreasing the level of ATP by arsenate treatment causes drug tolerance. Lowering ATP slows translation and prevents the formation of DNA double-strand breaks upon fluoroquinolone treatment. We conclude that variation in ATP levels leads to persister formation by decreasing the activity of antibiotic targets. IMPORTANCE: Persisters are a subpopulation of antibiotic-tolerant cells responsible for the recalcitrance of chronic infections. Our current understanding of persister formation is primarily based on studies of E. coli The activation of toxin-antitoxin systems by ppGpp has become a widely accepted model for persister formation. In this study, we found that stress-induced activation of mRNA interferase-type toxins does not necessarily cause persister formation. We also found that the persister marker rrnB P1 reports persister cells because it detects a drop in cellular ATP levels. Consistent with this, lowering the ATP level decreases antibiotic target activity and, thus, leads to persister formation. We conclude that stochastic variation in ATP is the main mechanism of persister formation. A decrease in ATP provides a satisfactory explanation for the drug tolerance of persisters, since bactericidal antibiotics act by corrupting energy-dependent targets.