Preoperative Inflammatory Markers in Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A National Registry-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative inflammatory markers were shown to be associated with prognosis following surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancer. Yet little evidence exists about their role in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study aimed to examine the association between selected preoperative inflammatory markers and outcomes of liver resection for CRLM. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian National Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NORGAST) was used to capture all liver resections performed in Norway within the study period (November 2015-April 2021). Preoperative inflammatory markers were Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR). The impact of these on postoperative outcomes, as well as on survival were studied. RESULTS: Liver resections for CRLM were performed in 1442 patients. Preoperative GPS ≥ 1 and mGPS ≥ 1 were present in 170 (11.8%) and 147 (10.2%) patients, respectively. Both were associated with severe complications but became non-significant in the multivariable model. GPS, mGPS, CAR were significant predictors for overall survival in the univariable analysis, but only CAR remained such in the multivariable model. When stratified by the type of surgical approach, CAR was a significant predictor for survival after open but not laparoscopic liver resections. CONCLUSIONS: GPS, mGPS and CAR have no impact on severe complications after liver resection for CRLM. CAR outperforms GPS and mGPS in predicting overall survival in these patients, especially following open resections. The prognostic significance of CAR in CRLM should be tested against other clinical and pathology parameters relevant for prognosis.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. This multicenter study examined the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for ICC. METHODS: Patients with ICC who had undergone laparoscopic or open liver resection between 2012 and 2019 at four European expert centers were included in the study. Laparoscopic and open approaches were compared in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for minimizing treatment selection bias and adjusting for confounders (age, ASA grade, tumor size, location, number of tumors and underlying liver disease). RESULTS: Of 136 patients, 50 (36.7%) underwent laparoscopic resection, whereas 86 (63.3%) had open surgery. Median tumor size was larger (73.6 vs 55.1 mm, p = 0.01) and the incidence of bi-lobar tumors was higher (36.6 vs 6%, p < 0.01) in patients undergoing open surgery. After propensity score matching baseline characteristics were comparable although open surgery was associated with a larger fraction of major liver resections (74 vs 38%, p < 0.01), lymphadenectomy (60 vs 20%, p < 0.01) and longer operative time (294 vs 209 min, p < 0.01). Tumor characteristics were similar. Laparoscopic resection resulted in less complications (30 vs 52%, p = 0.025), fewer reoperations (4 vs 16%, p = 0.046) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 8 days, p < 0.01). No differences were found in terms of recurrence, recurrence-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resection seems to be associated with improved short-term and with similar long-term outcomes compared with open surgery in patients with ICC. However, possible selection criteria for laparoscopic surgery are yet to be defined.

High Concordance and Negative Prognostic Impact of RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Mutations in Multiple Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and clinical implications of genetic heterogeneity in patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases remain largely unknown. In a prospective series of patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, the aim was to investigate the inter-metastatic and primary-to-metastatic heterogeneity of mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA and their prognostic impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the mutation status among 372 liver metastases and 78 primary tumors from 106 patients by methods used in clinical routine testing, by Sanger sequencing, by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and/or by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. The 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Although Sanger sequencing indicated inter-metastatic mutation heterogeneity in 14 of 97 patients (14%), almost all cases were refuted by high-sensitive NGS. Also, heterogeneity among metastatic deposits was concluded only for PIK3CA in 2 patients. Similarly, primary-to-metastatic heterogeneity was indicated in 8 of 78 patients (10%) using Sanger sequencing but for only 2 patients after NGS, showing the emergence of 1 KRAS and 1 PIK3CA mutation in the metastatic lesions. KRAS mutations were present in 53 of 106 patients (50%) and were associated with poorer 3-year CSS after liver resection (37% vs. 61% for KRAS wild-type; P = .004). Poor prognostic associations were found also for the combination of KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations compared with triple wild-type (P = .002). CONCLUSION: Intra-patient mutation heterogeneity was virtually undetected, both between the primary tumor and the liver metastases and among the metastatic deposits. KRAS mutations separately, and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations combined, were associated with poor patient survival after partial liver resection.

Heterogeneous radiological response to neoadjuvant therapy is associated with poor prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery combined with perioperative chemotherapy has become standard of care in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. However, poor outcome is expected for a significant subgroup. The clinical implications of inter-metastatic heterogeneity remain largely unknown. In a prospective, population-based series of patients undergoing resection of multiple colorectal liver metastases, the aim was to investigate the prevalence and prognostic impact of heterogeneous response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiological response to treatment was evaluated in a lesion-specific manner in 2-5 metastases per patient. Change of lesion diameter was evaluated and response/progression was classified according to three different size thresholds; 3, 4 and 5 mm. A heterogeneous response was defined as progression and response of different metastases in the same patient. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients with 585 liver metastases were examined with the same radiological method (MRI or CT) before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Heterogeneous response to treatment was seen in 16 patients (11%) using the 3 mm size change threshold, and this group had a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 19% compared to 49% for patients with response in all lesions (p = 0.003). Cut-off values of 4-5 mm were less sensitive for detecting a heterogeneous response, but the survival difference was similar and significant. CONCLUSION: A subgroup of patients with multiple colorectal liver metastases had heterogeneous radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and poor prognosis. The evaluation of response pattern is easy to perform, feasible in clinical practice and, if validated, a promising biomarker for treatment decisions.

Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort.

BACKGROUND: Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system. METHODS: A complete 5-year cohort of all liver resections from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). Short-term outcomes were aggregated length of stay (a-LoS), reoperation and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 2118 liver resections, 605 (28.6%) were major, median age was 65 years and 1184 (55%) were male. Most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 1554; 73.4%) and primary malignancy (n = 328; 15.3%). Laparoscopy was performed in 513 (33.9%) of minor and 37 (6.1%) of major liver resections and increased over time to 39.1% of minor resections in 2016. Median a-LoS was 12 days for major resections, 8 days for open minor and 3 days for laparoscopic minor resections. Reoperation was reported for 159 (7.4%) and 90-day mortality for 44 (2.1%). Primary malignancy, male gender, elderly patients and major resections were associated with poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a national cohort, laparoscopy is used for a substantial proportion of minor resections and was associated with reduced a-LoS. Risk factors for reoperation and mortality were male gender, increased age and major resection for primary malignancy.

Survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases in octogenarians and sexagenarians compared to their respective age-matched national population.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to investigate survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in octogenarians. The survival of octogenarian patients was compared to the survival of the national population of octogenarians and the survival of sexagenarians, the latter representing the average-age patient undergoing resection of CLM. METHODS: Octogenarian and sexagenarian were defined as person 80-89 and 60-69 years of age, respectively. Survival analyses of patients who underwent resection of CLM between 2002 and 2014 were performed. Data from Statistics Norway were used to estimate the survival of the age-matched national population of octogenarians (ageM-Octo) and the age-matched national population of sexagenarians (ageM-Sexa). RESULTS: During the study period, 59 octogenarians underwent resection of CLM. The majority of patients underwent a minor liver resection (n=50). In octogenarians, the 5-year survival was 32.5% and 66.3% [difference, 33.8 percentage points (pp)] in patients and ageM-Octo, respectively. The 10-year survival was 14.1% and 31.2% (difference, 17.1 pp) in patients and ageM-Octo, respectively. In sexagenarians, the 5-year survival was 50.9% and 96.2% (difference, 45.3 pp) in patients and ageM-Sexa, respectively. The 10-year survival was 35.7% and 90.3% (difference, 54.6 pp) in patients and ageM-Sexa, respectively. The 5-year cancer-specific survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after resection of CLM in octogenarians were 43.1% and 32.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After resection of CLM, the survival was poorer in octogenarians than in sexagenarians. However, the difference between the survival curves of patients and their age-matched population was smaller in octogenarians. In practice, this finding may indicate a greater benefit of resection in the elderly than the survival rates alone would suggest.

Unplanned readmission and outpatient examination 90-days after acute appendectomy in adults.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and indications for unplanned readmission and outpatient examination after acute appendectomy. METHODS: Adults who underwent acute appendectomy from 2008-2013 were included in the study and events occurring within 90-days from discharge recorded. RESULTS: A total of 710 patients underwent surgery. The appendix was removed in 622 patients and post-discharge contact occurred in 99 (15.9%): readmission in 60 (9.6%), outpatient examination in 39 (6.3%). The main reasons for post-discharge contact were infection (n = 25; intraabdominal, n = 16; superficial) and abdominal pain of uncertain cause (n = 25). Use of prophylactic antibiotics was associated with lower rates of contact, 8.5% versus 20.9% (p = 0.006), respectively. Removal of non-inflamed appendix was borderline associated with higher rates of contact, 21.7% versus 8.0% (if left in-situ; p = 0.058), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients underwent readmission or outpatient examination within 90-days after appendectomy in the current study. The procedure is common and attempts to prevent readmissions are important. Correct use of antibiotics and not removing a non-inflamed appendix may be key points.

Embryonic Origin of Primary Colon Cancer Predicts Pathologic Response and Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection for Colon Cancer Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of embryonic origin in patients undergoing resection after chemotherapy for colon cancer liver metastases (CCLM). METHODS: We identified 725 patients with primary colon cancer and known RAS mutation status who underwent hepatic resection after preoperative chemotherapy for CCLM (1990 to 2015). Survival after resection of CCLM from midgut origin (n = 238) and hindgut origin (n = 487) was analyzed. Predictors of pathologic response and survival were determined. Prognostic value of embryonic origin was validated with a separate cohort of 252 patients with primary colon cancer who underwent resection of CCLM without preoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after hepatic resection were worse in patients with midgut origin tumors (RFS rate at 3 years: 15% vs 27%, P < 0.001; OS rate at 3 years: 46% vs 68%, P < 0.001). Independent factors associated with minor pathologic response were midgut embryonic origin [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, P = 0.010], absence of bevacizumab (OR 1.42, P = 0.034), and mutant RAS (OR 1.41, P = 0.043). Independent factors associated with worse OS were midgut embryonic origin [hazard ratio (HR) 2.04, P < 0.001], carcinoembryonic antigen value ≥5 ng/mL at hepatic resection (HR 1.46, P = 0.0021), synchronous CCLM (HR 1.45, P = 0.012), and mutant RAS (HR 1.43, P = 0.0040). In the validation cohort, patients with CCLM of midgut origin had a worse 3-year OS rate (55% vs 78%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CCLM from hindgut origin, CCLM from midgut origin are associated with worse pathologic response to chemotherapy and worse survival after resection. This effect appears to be independent of RAS mutation status.

RAS Mutation Is Associated with Decreased Survival in Patients Undergoing Repeat Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between RAS mutation status and outcome for patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy (RH) for recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has not been defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RAS mutation status and outcome in patients undergoing RH for CLM. METHODS: All patients who underwent RH for CLM with known RAS mutation status between January 2005 and November 2014 were identified, and the outcomes of patients with and without RAS mutations were compared. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients underwent RH, of whom 34 (35 %) harbored a RAS mutation. Wild-type (WT) and mutant RAS groups had similar clinicopathologic characteristics. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients with WT and mutant RAS was 12.2 and 6.1 months, respectively (p = 0.03). Median overall survival (OS) for the WT and mutant RAS patients were 42.5 and 26.6 months, respectively (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, RAS mutations [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69, p = 0.04] were associated with worse RFS, while multiple tumors (HR = 1.92, p = 0.045) and RAS mutations (HR = 2.11, p = 0.02) predicted worse OS. CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent CLM that harbor RAS mutations have worse RFS and OS than patients with WT RAS, and RAS mutations are independently associated with worse RFS and OS. RAS mutation status should be determined prior to RH, as it may impact treatment decisions.

Is hepatectomy justified for patients with RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases? An analysis of 524 patients undergoing curative liver resection.

BACKGROUND: RAS mutations are associated with limited overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Our aim was to determine criteria for considering hepatectomy for patients with RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: Of 1,163 patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases during 2005-2014, all patients operated on with curative intent who had known RAS mutation status were included. Factors associated with overall survival were determined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients met the inclusion criteria; 212 (40%) had mutated RAS. Mutations were located on codon 12 in 128 patients (60%) and codon 13 in 29 (14%). At median follow-up of 38 months, median overall survival was 72.6 months for wild-type RAS and 50.9 months for mutated RAS (P < .001). Median overall survival for patients with codon 12 and 13 mutations was 51.9 and 50.9 months, respectively (P = .839), significantly worse than for patients with wild-type RAS (P = .005, and P = .038 for codon 12 and 13, respectively). For patients with RAS mutation, factors associated independently with worse overall survival were node-positive primary tumor, tumor >3 cm, and >7 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Major and 2-stage hepatectomy were not associated independently with overall survival. Median overall survival was 57, 41, and 21.5 months for patients with 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. There were no 4-year survivors in the highest-risk group. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple risk factors had poor overall survival after curative resection of RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases. For such patients, hepatectomy may be ill advised, and alternative therapies or further systemic therapy should be considered.

Aspirin As Secondary Prevention in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: An Unselected Population-Based Study.

PURPOSE: Regular use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is associated with reduced incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, aspirin as primary prevention is debated because of the risk of hemorrhagic adverse effects. Aspirin as secondary prevention may be more justified from a risk-benefit perspective. We have examined the association between aspirin use after the diagnosis of CRC with CRC-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted by linking patients diagnosed with CRC from 2004 through 2011 (Cancer Registry of Norway) with data on their aspirin use (The Norwegian Prescription Database). These registries cover more than 99% of the Norwegian population and include all patients in an unselected and consecutive manner. Exposure to aspirin was defined as receipt of aspirin prescriptions for more than 6 months after the diagnosis of CRC. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazard analyses were used to model survival. The main outcome measures of the study were CSS and OS. RESULTS: A total of 23,162 patients diagnosed with CRC were included, 6,102 of whom were exposed to aspirin after the diagnosis of CRC (26.3%). The median follow-up time was 3.0 years. A total of 2,071 deaths (32.9%, all causes) occurred among aspirin-exposed patients, of which 1,158 (19.0%) were CRC specific. Among unexposed patients (n = 17,060), there were 7,218 deaths (42.3%), of which 5,375 (31.5%) were CRC specific. In multivariable analysis, aspirin exposure after the diagnosis of CRC was independently associated with improved CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.92) and OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.01). CONCLUSION: Aspirin use after the diagnosis of CRC is independently associated with improved CSS and OS.

Predictors of Safety and Efficacy of 2-Stage Hepatectomy for Bilateral Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: In patients with bilateral colorectal liver metastases (CLM) not resectable in 1 operation, 2-stage hepatectomy is the standard surgical approach. The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with safety and efficacy of 2-stage hepatectomy. STUDY DESIGN: The study included all 109 patients for whom 2-stage hepatectomy for CLM was planned during 2003 to 2014. The RAS mutation status and other clinicopathologic factors were evaluated for association with major complications and survival using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Two-stage hepatectomy was completed in 89 of 109 patients (82%). Reasons for dropout after the first stage were disease progression (n = 12), insufficient liver growth (n = 5), and complications after first stage or portal vein embolization (n = 3). More than 6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy were associated with failure to proceed to the second stage (p = 0.009). Rates of major complications (26% vs 6%; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (7% vs 0%; p = 0.006) were higher after the second stage. The cumulative rate of major complications was 15% (n = 29). Factors independently associated with major complications were rectal primary tumor, metachronous CLM, and more than 1 lesion resected at first stage. At median follow-up of 29.5 months, 3-year (68% vs 6%; p < 0.001) and 5-year overall survival rates (49% vs 0%; p < 0.001) were better after 2-stage hepatectomy completion than noncompletion. Factors independently associated with poor overall survival were rectal primary tumor (p = 0.044), more than 5 CLMs (p = 0.043), need for chemotherapy after first stage (p = 0.046), and RAS mutation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RAS mutation independently predicts the oncologic efficacy of 2-stage hepatectomy and may help guide patient selection for this aggressive surgical strategy.

RAS Mutation Predicts Positive Resection Margins and Narrower Resection Margins in Patients Undergoing Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM), resection margin status is a significant predictor of survival, particularly in patients with suboptimal response to preoperative therapy. RAS mutations have been linked to more invasive and migratory tumor biology and poor response to modern chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RAS mutation and resection margin status in patients undergoing resection of CLM. METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection of CLM from 2005 to 2013 with known RAS mutation status were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A positive margin was defined as tumor cells <1 mm from the parenchymal transection line. RESULTS: The study included 633 patients, of whom 229 (36.2 %) had mutant RAS. The positive margin rate was 11.4 % (26/229) for mutant RAS and 5.4 % (22/404) for wild-type RAS (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, the only factors associated with a positive margin were RAS mutation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.439; p = 0.005) and carcinoembryonic antigen level 4.5 ng/mL or greater (HR 2.060; p = 0.026). Among patients presenting with liver-first recurrence during follow-up, those with mutant RAS had narrower margins at initial CLM resection (median 4 mm vs. 7 mm; p = 0.031). A positive margin (HR 3.360; p < 0.001) and RAS mutation (HR 1.629; p = 0.044) were independently associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: RAS mutations are associated with positive margins in patients undergoing resection of CLM. Tumors with RAS mutation should prompt careful efforts to achieve negative resection margins.