Plasma creatinine below limit of quantification in a patient with acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an infrequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease and can be exceptionally linked to interstitial nephritis secondary to anti-inflammatory drugs, such as Pentasa® (5-ASA). CASE PRESENTATION: We present an case of an 80-year-old man who presented chronic diarrheas treated by Pentasa®. He developed AKI, evidenced by high plasma creatinine dosed in his local laboratory. At the hospital admission, plasma creatinine was exceptionally undetectable by the enzymatic method while Jaffe's method successfully determined it. Creatinine measurement by the enzymatic method was gradually restored during hospital stay, concomitant with the discontinuation of 5-ASA administration, suggesting that this drug could interfere with creatinine enzymatic assay. Creatinine enzymatic assays combine serial reactions. The last one called Trinder reaction, catalyzed by a peroxidase, uses H2O2 to convert uncolored dye in a colored compound, proportionally to creatinine concentration. We showed that AKI related-plasma accumulation of 5-ASA, could participate in the negative interference observed on creatinine measurement, by scavenging H2O2. Interestingly, all Trinder reaction-based measurements (uric acid, lipase, lactate, triglycerides and cholesterol) were affected. Negative interference of 5-ASA was confirmed by interferogram experiments on all Trinder reaction-dependent assays. CONCLUSION: All Trinder-dependent parameters should be interpreted with the patient's treatment knowledge, in particular salicylate derivatives.

Dabigatran Level Before Reversal Can Predict Hemostatic Effectiveness of Idarucizumab in a Real-World Setting.

Background: Idarucizumab has been included in guidelines for the management of bleeding or surgical procedure in dabigatran-treated patients without need for biological monitoring. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of dabigatran plasma level before reversal to test the hemostatic efficacy of idarucizumab. The secondary objectives were (i) to analyze plasma dabigatran level according to the risk of rebound and (ii) to evaluate the incidence of post-reversal non-favorable clinical outcomes (including thromboembolism, bleeding, antithrombotic, and death) and antithrombotic resumption. Methods and Results: This was an observational multicentric cohort study, which included all French patients who required idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. Between May 2016 and April 2019, 87 patients from 21 French centers were enrolled. Patients received idarucizumab for overt bleeding (n = 61), urgent procedures (n = 24), or overdose without bleeding (n = 2). Among patients with major bleeding (n = 57), treatment with idarucizumab was considered effective in 44 (77.2%) of them. Patients who did not achieve effective hemostasis after reversal had a significantly higher mean level of plasma dabigatran at baseline (524.5 ± 386 vs. 252.8 ng/mL ± 235, p = 0.033). Furthermore, patients who did not achieve effective hemostasis after reversal had less favorable outcomes during follow-up (46.2 vs. 81.8%, p = 0.027). ROC curve identified a cutoff of 264 ng/mL for dabigatran level at admission to be predictive of ineffective hemostasis. No plasma dabigatran rebound was observed after reversal in patients with dabigatran plasma level < 264 ng/mL at baseline. Conclusion: This retrospective study shows that dabigatran level before reversal could predict hemostatic effectiveness and dabigatran plasma rebound after idarucizumab injection.