Efficacy of Rubella Vaccination after Co-Inoculation with Rhogam.

Congenital rubella syndrome is a constellation of birth defects that can have devastating consequences, impacting approximately 100,000 births worldwide each year. The incidence is much lower in countries that routinely vaccinate their population. In the US, postnatal immunization of susceptible women is an important epidemiological strategy for the prevention of rubella as the Center for Disease Control (CDC) does not recommend administering this vaccine during pregnancy due to its nature as a live attenuated virus vaccine. However, concerns that the co-administration of rubella vaccine with other immunoglobins (i.e., Rhogam) could compromise vaccine efficacy has produced warnings that can delay the administration of rubella vaccination postpartum, leaving women susceptible to the disease in subsequent pregnancies. We aimed to address whether the co-administration of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and Rhogam decreased antibody responses compared to those receiving only MMR vaccination. This retrospective cohort study utilized clinical data from 78 subjects who received the MMR vaccine and Rhogam after delivery and 45 subjects who received the MMR vaccine alone. Maternal demographics, pregnancy complications and rubella status at the start of a subsequent pregnancy were recorded for analysis. Overall, the two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics; however, lower parity was noted in the participants that received both MMR vaccination and Rhogam. Making assessments based on maternal antibody IgG index for rubella during the next pregnancy, we observed that 88% of the Rhogam + MMR vaccine group had positive serology scores, which was not significantly different from the 80% rate in the MMR-vaccine-only cohort (p = 0.2). In conclusion, no differences were observed in rubella immunity status in subsequent pregnancies in those mothers given both the MMR vaccine and Rhogam concurrently. Given these findings, warnings against co-administration of vaccines in combination with Rhogam appear unwarranted.

Focal-occult placenta accreta: a clandestine source of maternal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum is known to cause adverse obstetrical morbidity outcomes, however, direct comparisons with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum morbidity are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the baseline characteristics, surgical and obstetrical morbidity, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those of patients with previa-associated accreta. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted of all pathologically confirmed placenta accreta spectrum cases from 2018 to 2022 at a tertiary care center. The baseline characteristics, surgical, obstetrical, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were recorded. Cases of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was compared with cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum across a range of morbidity characteristics including hemorrhagic factors, interventions, postdelivery reoperations, infections, and intensive care unit admission. Statistical comparison was performed using Kruskal-Wallis or chi-square tests, and a P value of <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 74 cases were identified with 43 focal-occult and 31 previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum cases. Of those, 25.6% of the patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 100% of the patients with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum underwent a hysterectomy. One case of focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum and 29 cases of previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum were diagnosed antenatally. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum did not differ from those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum in mean maternal age (33.0 vs 33.1 years), body mass index, or the incidence of previous dilation and curettage procedures (16.3% vs 25.8%). Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum were significantly more likely to have a lower mean parity (1.5 vs 3.6 gestations), higher gestational age at delivery (36.1 vs 33.9 weeks' gestation), and were less likely to have had a previous cesarean delivery (12/43, 27.9% vs 30/31, 96.8%). In addition, patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum had less previous cesarean deliveries (mean, 0.5 vs 2.3), were more likely to have undergone in vitro fertilization (20.9% vs 3.2%), and less likely to have anterior placentation. When contrasting the clinical outcomes of patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum with those with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the postpartum hemorrhage rates (71.0% vs 67.4%), mean quantitative blood loss (2099 mL; range, 500-9516 mL vs 2119 mL; range 350-12,220 mL), mean units of red blood cells transfused (1.4 vs 1.7), massive transfusion rate (9.3% vs 3.2%), and intensive care unit admission rates (11.6% vs 6.5%) were not significantly different, but there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher morbidity among patients with focal-occult accreta. Patients with focal-occult accreta had a higher incidence of reoperations or return to the operating room (30.2 vs 6.5%; P=.01). When comparing focal-occult with previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, the composite outcomes, including hemorrhagic morbidity (77.4% vs 74.4%), any maternal morbidity (83.9% vs 76.7%), and severe maternal morbidity (64.5% vs 65.1%), were not significantly different between the groups. Nine focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum patients had a subsequent pregnancy, and 3 of those had recurrent placenta accreta spectrum. CONCLUSION: Focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum presents with fewer identifiable risk factors than placenta previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum but may be associated with an in vitro fertilization pregnancy. Patients with focal-occult placenta accreta spectrum was observed to have a higher incidence of reoperation when compared with patients previa-associated placenta accreta spectrum, and no other statistically significant differences in morbidity outcomes were observed. The absence of differences in morbidity outcomes may be attributable to a lack of antenatal detection of focal-occult accreta and merits further investigation.

Peritoneal tuberculosis: A case report on a rare cause of tumor marker elevation.

Peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) is a rare extrapulmonary manifestation of TB with non-specific clinical characteristics which can produce test results mimicking malignancy and granulomatous peritonitis. This case describes a Filipino 59-year-old, nulliparous woman who was admitted with abdominal pain, ascites, and an elevated CA-125 level. Radiographically, peritoneal nodules were visualized and initial suspicion was high for malignancy. Following a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and peritoneal biopsy, histology was negative for malignancy but revealed non-caseating granulomas. She was discharged then readmitted with progressive abdominal pain, and a repeat laparoscopic biopsy yielded specimens with growth of acid-fast bacilli (AFB). A delay in diagnosis and treatment of tuberculous peritonitis increases mortality rates, making early diagnosis with laparoscopic biopsy of paramount importance in prompt diagnosis and initiation of therapy. This patient was initiated on standard anti-TB therapy and experienced no complications.

Utility and limitations of exome sequencing as a genetic diagnostic tool for children with hearing loss.

PURPOSE: Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensory disorder in children. Prompt molecular diagnosis may guide screening and management, especially in syndromic cases when HL is the single presenting feature. Exome sequencing (ES) is an appealing diagnostic tool for HL as the genetic causes are highly heterogeneous. METHODS: ES was performed on a prospective cohort of 43 probands with HL. Sequence data were analyzed for primary and secondary findings. Capture and coverage analysis was performed for genes and variants associated with HL. RESULTS: The diagnostic rate using ES was 37.2%, compared with 15.8% for the clinical HL panel. Secondary findings were discovered in three patients. For 247 genes associated with HL, 94.7% of the exons were targeted for capture and 81.7% of these exons were covered at 20× or greater. Further analysis of 454 randomly selected HL-associated variants showed that 89% were targeted for capture and 75% were covered at a read depth of at least 20×. CONCLUSION: ES has an improved yield compared with clinical testing and may capture diagnoses not initially considered due to subtle clinical phenotypes. Technical challenges were identified, including inadequate capture and coverage of HL genes. Additional considerations of ES include secondary findings, cost, and turnaround time.

Utility and limitations of exome sequencing as a genetic diagnostic tool for conditions associated with pediatric sudden cardiac arrest/sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND: Conditions associated with sudden cardiac arrest/death (SCA/D) in youth often have a genetic etiology. While SCA/D is uncommon, a pro-active family screening approach may identify these inherited structural and electrical abnormalities prior to symptomatic events and allow appropriate surveillance and treatment. This study investigated the diagnostic utility of exome sequencing (ES) by evaluating the capture and coverage of genes related to SCA/D. METHODS: Samples from 102 individuals (13 with known molecular etiologies for SCA/D, 30 individuals without known molecular etiologies for SCA/D and 59 with other conditions) were analyzed following exome capture and sequencing at an average read depth of 100X. Reads were mapped to human genome GRCh37 using Novoalign, and post-processing and analysis was done using Picard and GATK. A total of 103 genes (2,190 exons) related to SCA/D were used as a primary filter. An additional 100 random variants within the targeted genes associated with SCA/D were also selected and evaluated for depth of sequencing and coverage. Although the primary objective was to evaluate the adequacy of depth of sequencing and coverage of targeted SCA/D genes and not for primary diagnosis, all patients who had SCA/D (known or unknown molecular etiologies) were evaluated with the project's variant analysis pipeline to determine if the molecular etiologies could be successfully identified. RESULTS: The majority of exons (97.6 %) were captured and fully covered on average at minimum of 20x sequencing depth. The proportion of unique genomic positions reported within poorly covered exons remained small (4 %). Exonic regions with less coverage reflect the need to enrich these areas to improve coverage. Despite limitations in coverage, we identified 100 % of cases with a prior known molecular etiology for SCA/D, and analysis of an additional 30 individuals with SCA/D but no known molecular etiology revealed a diagnostic answer in 5/30 (17 %). We also demonstrated 95 % of 100 randomly selected reported variants within our targeted genes would have been picked up on ES based on our coverage analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ES is a helpful clinical diagnostic tool for SCA/D given its potential to successfully identify a molecular diagnosis, but clinicians should be aware of limitations of available platforms from technical and diagnostic perspectives.