The influence of cross-border mobility on the COVID-19 epidemic in Nordic countries.

Restrictions of cross-border mobility are typically used to prevent an emerging disease from entering a country in order to slow down its spread. However, such interventions can come with a significant societal cost and should thus be based on careful analysis and quantitative understanding on their effects. To this end, we model the influence of cross-border mobility on the spread of COVID-19 during 2020 in the neighbouring Nordic countries of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. We investigate the immediate impact of cross-border travel on disease spread and employ counterfactual scenarios to explore the cumulative effects of introducing additional infected individuals into a population during the ongoing epidemic. Our results indicate that the effect of inter-country mobility on epidemic growth is non-negligible essentially when there is sizeable mobility from a high prevalence country or countries to a low prevalence one. Our findings underscore the critical importance of accurate data and models on both epidemic progression and travel patterns in informing decisions related to inter-country mobility restrictions.

Strategies for pairwise searches in forensic kinship analysis.

Testing kinship between pairs of individuals is central to a wide range of applications. We focus on cases where many tests are done jointly. Typical examples include cases where DNA profiles are available from a burial site, a plane crash or a database of convicted offenders. The task is to determine the relationships between DNA profiles or individuals. Our approach generalises previous methods and implementations in several respects. We model general, possibly inbred, pairwise relationships which is important for non-human applications and in archaeological studies of ancient inbred populations. Furthermore, we do not restrict attention to autosomal markers. Some cases, such as distinguishing between maternal and paternal half siblings, can be solved using X-chromosomal markers. When many tests are done, the risk of errors increases. We address this problem by building on the theory of multiple testing and show how optimal thresholds for tests can be determined. We point out that the likelihood ratios in a blind search may be dependent so multiple testing methods and interpretation need to account for this. In addition, we show how a Bayesian approach can be helpful. Our examples, using simulated and real data, demonstrate the practical importance of the methods and implementation is based on freely available software.

Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.

In this paper we investigate various effects of inbreeding on the likelihood ratio (LR) in forensic kinship testing. The basic setup of such testing involves formulating two competing hypotheses, in the form of pedigrees, describing the relationship between the individuals. The likelihood of each hypothesis is computed given the available genetic data, and a conclusion is reached if the ratio of these exceeds some pre-determined threshold. An important aspect of this approach is that the hypotheses are usually not exhaustive: The true relationship may differ from both of the stated pedigrees. It is well known that this may introduce bias in the test results. Previous work has established formulas for the expected value and variance of the LR, given the two competing hypotheses and the true relationship. However, the proposed method only handles cases without inbreeding. In this paper we extend these results to all possible pairwise relationships. The key ingredient is formulating the hypotheses in terms of Jacquard coefficients instead of the more restricted Cotterman coefficients. While the latter describe the relatedness between outbred individuals, the more general Jacquard coefficients allow any level of inbreeding. Our approach also enables scrutiny of another frequently overlooked source of LR bias, namely background inbreeding. This ubiquitous phenomenon is usually ignored in forensic kinship computations, due to lack of adequate methods and software. By leveraging recent work on pedigrees with inbred founders, we show how background inbreeding can be modeled as a continuous variable, providing easy-to-interpret results in specific cases. For example, we show that if true siblings are subjected to a test for parent-offspring, moderate levels of background inbreeding are expected to inflate the LR by more than 50%.