Dyslipidemia treatment and attainment of LDL-cholesterol treatment goals in patients participating in the Managed Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors program.

BACKGROUND: Patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Therefore, appropriate management of dyslipidemia with adequate lipid-lowering therapy is crucial for preventing subsequent CV events in these patients. AIMS: Our analysis aimed to assess the treatment of dyslipidemia and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals in patients after AMI who participated in the Managed Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors (MACAMIS) program. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with AMI who agreed to participate and completed the 12-month MACAMIS program at one of three tertiary referral cardiovascular centers in Poland between October 2017 and January 2021. RESULTS: 1499 patients after AMI were enrolled in the study. High-intensity statin therapy was prescribed for 85.5% of analyzed patients on hospital discharge. Combined therapy with high-intensity statin and ezetimibe increased from 2.1% on hospital discharge to 18.2% after 12 months. In the whole study cohort, 20.4% of patients achieved the LDL-C target of < 55 mg/dl ( < 1.4 mmol/l), and 26.9% of patients achieved at least a 50% reduction in LDL-C level one year after AMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that participation in the managed care program might be associated with improved quality of dyslipidemia management in AMI patients. Nonetheless, only one-fifth of patients who completed the program achieved the treatment goal for LDL-C. This highlights the constant need for optimizing lipid-lowering therapy to meet treatment targets and reduce CV risk in patients after AMI.

Clinical Characteristics Predicting Worse Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA).

Non-obstructive coronary artery disease occurs in 3.5-15% of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. This group of patients has a poor prognosis. Identification of factors that predict worse outcomes in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is therefore important. Patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA (n = 110) were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective registry. Follow-up was performed 12, 24 and 36 months after discharge. The primary composite endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke or TIA, all-cause death, or hospital readmission due to any cardiovascular event. The mean age of the study group was 64.9 (± 13.5) years and 38.2% of patients were male. The occurrence of the primary composite endpoint was 36.4%. In a COX proportional hazards model analysis, older age (p = 0.027), type 2 diabetes (p = 0.013), history of neoplasm (p = 0.004), ST-segment depression (p = 0.018) and left bundle branch block/right bundle branch block (p = 0.004) by ECG on discharge, higher Gensini score (p = 0.022), higher intraventricular septum (p = 0.007) and posterior wall thickness increases (p = 0.001) were shown to be risk factors for primary composite endpoint occurrence. Our study revealed that several factors such as older age, type 2 diabetes, ST-segment depression and LBBB/RBBB in ECG on discharge, higher Gensini score, and myocardial hypertrophy and history of neoplasm may contribute to worse clinical outcomes in MINOCA patients.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty for severe aortic stenosis may reduce mitral regurgitation in mid-term follow-up.

Introduction: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a frequent complication in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Material and methods: Echocardiographic assessment of MR was performed at baseline, at 30 days and at 6 months after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Results: Data of 271 patients were included in our final analysis, of which 21.2% (n = 85) had at least moderate MR at baseline (in 19 (22.3%) subjects MR was diagnosed as primary). Both groups showed similar severity of AS, but patients in the MR group had a greater left ventricle (LV) size (p = 0.003 for LVESD, p = 0002 for LVEDD) and slightly lower LV ejection fraction (p = 0.04). Mitral regurgitation parameters significantly improved both at 30 days and 6 months after BAV in the MR group (MR jet area: 7.2 (4.5-9.9) vs. 3.6 (2.3-7.2) cm2, and 7.2 (4.5-9.9) vs. 3.2 (2.1-6.7) cm2; %MR/left atrial area 34.5 (23.4-42.7) vs. 17.5 (9.3-29.5) and 34.5 (23.4-42.7) vs. 14.5 (8.3-24.5), p < 0.001 for all). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the change at 30 days, from baseline, in the LVESD (OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.23-2.87; p < 0.001) and LVEF (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.87-1.01; p < 0.001); MR jet area (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.5-4.6; p < 0.001) and the presence of primary MR (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.04-5.98; p < 0.001) were retained as independent predictors of significant persisting MR at 6 months. Conclusions: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty may reduce MR in mid-term follow-up. Predictors of persistent MR at 6 months after BAV included an increase of LVESD and MR jet area and decrease of LVEF at 30 days.

Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Severe Aortic Stenosis as Rescue or Bridge Therapy.

The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55-2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62-3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.