Southwick angle measurements and SCFE slip severity classifications are affected by frog-lateral positioning.

OBJECTIVE: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a hip disorder where the femoral head slips relative to the neck at the physis. Appropriate treatment of SCFE depends on the severity of the slip, commonly categorised using the Southwick (SW) angle. The SW angle is measured in the frog-lateral leg position, which can be painful and potentially unattainable for patients. The purpose of this study is to determine how errors in frog-lateral radiograph positioning affect measured SW angles and slip classifications. METHODS: Models of SCFE hips were produced from one CT scan of a normal hip; 360 deformities were created. SW angles were measured from a simulated frog-lateral position. Femoral lateral head-neck angles (LHNA; equivalent to SW in incorrect frog-lateral plane) were measured over a range of 837 incorrect frog-lateral leg positions with positioning errors in flexion and/or internal/external rotation. RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of all imaging position-deformity combinations had error in the reported angle (>1° difference between LHNA and SW). Of those, 70% had <5°, 24% had 5° to 10°, and 6% had >10° of error from the actual SW angle. Three per cent of LHNAs that had >10° error resulted from <10° of positioning error. CONCLUSIONS: If the patient is limited in flexion or external rotation, more diagnostic testing should be considered if error in the reported slip measurement would affect treatment decisions or if accurate severity classification is needed for research. Small positioning errors in moderate and severe slips can cause a > 10° LHNA error; additional three-dimensional imaging should be considered.

Relationships Between Severity of Deformity and Impingement in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

BACKGROUND: In situ pinning, a low-risk treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), leaves the slipped femoral head in place and may reduce range of motion (ROM) and cause impingement. It is unclear when a more complex surgery should be considered, because the relationships between severity, slip stability, remodeling, impingement, and ROM are unknown. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: (1) Do more severe acute SCFE deformities (no bony remodeling) result in a greater loss of flexion ROM?(2) Does the presence or location of impingement on the pelvis vary with severity of acute SCFE deformity? METHODS: We developed a 3D geometric model of acute SCFE deformity from 1 computed tomography scan of a normal adolescent hip. Ethics board approval was obtained from our institution. Bone models were created from the segmented pelvis, epiphysis, and subphyseal femur.In total, 3721 SCFE deformities were simulated by combining posterior and inferior slips in the axial and coronal planes, respectively. Southwick angles were estimated from a frog-leg lateral projection. Deformities were divided into mild (0 to 30 degrees), moderate (30 to 60 degrees), and severe (≥60 degrees) Southwick groups. Each joint was flexed in combination with internal/external rotation until contact occurred. A total of 121 ROM trials, with different degrees of internal/external rotation (0 to 90 degrees at 1.5-degree steps) were performed for each deformity. RESULTS: In total, 3355 simulated SCFE deformities (363 could not be rotated out of impingement) were analyzed.Increasing slip severity reduced flexion ROM across the range of internal/external rotation. Contact occurred for most mild deformities, and for all moderate and severe deformities in at least 1 ROM trial. Impingement was observed mainly on the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing slip severity in acute SCFE reduced flexion and increased incidence of impingement, primarily occurring on the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum. The impingement patterns observed are consistent with damaged cartilage locations seen in clinical literature. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this experimental model, moderate and severe acute slips in SCFE lead to reduced ROM and impingement with the acetabulum. This suggests that in situ pinning may result in impingement of moderate and severe acute SCFE slips.

Open-MRI measures of cam intrusion for hips in an anterior impingement position relate to acetabular contact force.

Open MRI in functional positions has potential to directly and non-invasively assess cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Our objective was to investigate whether open MRI can depict intrusion of the cam deformity into the intra-articular joint space, and whether intrusion is associated with elevated acetabular contact force. Cadaver hips (9 cam; 3 controls) were positioned in an anterior impingement posture and imaged using open MRI with multi-planar reformatting. The ß-angle (describing clearance between the femoral neck and acetabulum) was measured around the entire circumference of the femoral neck. We defined a binary "MRI cam-intrusion sign" (positive if ß < 0°). We then instrumented each hip with a piezoresistive sensor and conducted six repeated positioning trials, measuring acetabular contact force (F). We defined a binary "contact-force sign" (positive if F > 20N). Cam hips were more likely than controls to have both a positive MRI cam-intrusion sign (p = 0.0182, Fisher's exact test) and positive contact-force sign (p = 0.0083), which represents direct experimental evidence for cam intrusion. There was also a relationship between the MRI cam-intrusion sign and contact-force sign (p = 0.033), representing a link between imaging and mechanics. Our findings indicate that open MRI has significant potential for in vivo investigation of the cam FAI mechanism.

Making Safe Surgery Affordable: Design of a Surgical Drill Cover System for Scale.

Many surgeons in low-resource settings do not have access to safe, affordable, or reliable surgical drilling tools. Surgeons often resort to nonsterile hardware drills because they are affordable, robust, and efficient, but they are impossible to sterilize using steam. A promising alternative is to use a Drill Cover system (a sterilizable fabric bag plus surgical chuck adapter) so that a nonsterile hardware drill can be used safely for surgical bone drilling. Our objective was to design a safe, effective, affordable Drill Cover system for scale in low-resource settings. We designed our device based on feedback from users at Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda) and focused on 3 main aspects. First, the design included a sealed barrier between the surgical field and hardware drill that withstands pressurized fluid. Second, the selected hardware drill had a maximum speed of 1050 rpm to match common surgical drills and reduce risk of necrosis. Third, the fabric cover was optimized for ease of assembly while maintaining a sterile technique. Furthermore, with the Drill Cover approach, multiple Drill Covers can be provided with a single battery-powered drill in a "kit," so that the drill can be used in back-to-back surgeries without requiring immediate sterilization. The Drill Cover design presented here provides a proof-of-concept for a product that can be commercialized, produced at scale, and used in low-resource settings globally to improve access to safe surgery.