RESUMO
Massively parallel sequencing has markedly improved mendelian diagnostic rates. This study assessed the effects of custom alterations to a diagnostic genomic bioinformatic pipeline in response to clinical need and derived practice recommendations relative to diagnostic rates and efficiency. The Genomic Annotation and Interpretation Application (GAIA) bioinformatics pipeline was designed to detect panel, exome, and genome sample integrity and prioritize gene variants in mendelian disorders. Reanalysis of selected negative cases was performed after improvements to the pipeline. GAIA improvements and their effect on sensitivity are described, including addition of a PubMed search for gene-disease associations not in the Online Mendelian Inheritance of Man database, inclusion of a process for calling low-quality variants (known as QPatch), and gene symbol nomenclature consistency checking. The new pipeline increased the diagnostic rate and reduced staff costs, resulting in a saving of US$844.34 per additional diagnosis. Recommendations for genomic analysis pipeline requirements are summarized. Clinically responsive bioinformatics pipeline improvements increase diagnostic sensitivity and increase cost-effectiveness.
Assuntos
Sequenciamento do Exoma/métodos , Doenças Genéticas Inatas/genética , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Exoma , Testes Genéticos/economia , Genoma Humano , Genômica/economia , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/economia , Humanos , Mutação INDEL , Fenótipo , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sequenciamento do Exoma/economiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: The craniosynostoses are characterized by premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. The relative contribution of previously reported genes to craniosynostosis in large cohorts is unclear. Here we report on the use of a massively parallel sequencing panel in individuals with craniosynostosis without a prior molecular diagnosis. METHODS: A 20-gene panel was designed based on the genes' association with craniosynostosis, and clinically validated through retrospective testing of an Australian and New Zealand cohort of 233 individuals with craniosynostosis in whom previous testing had not identified a causative variant within FGFR1-3 hot-spot regions or the TWIST1 gene. An additional 76 individuals were tested prospectively. RESULTS: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in non-FGFR genes were identified in 43 individuals, with diagnostic yields of 14% and 15% in retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Variants were identified most frequently in TCF12 (N = 22) and EFNB1 (N = 8), typically in individuals with nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis or TWIST1-negative clinically suspected Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Clinically significant variants were also identified in ALX4, EFNA4, ERF, and FGF10. CONCLUSION: These findings support the clinical utility of a massively parallel sequencing panel for craniosynostosis. TCF12 and EFNB1 should be included in genetic testing for nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis or clinically suspected Saethre-Chotzen syndrome.