Immunocytochemical typing of primary tumors on fine-needle aspiration cytologies of lymph nodes.

The aim of this study was to analyze the role of immunocytochemistry as an ancillary method on routine FNACs of enlarged lymph nodes, using different markers. In a validating cohort study all patients had confirmatory histological and/or clinical follow-up. 10 FNACs were analyzed for the differentiation of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) from metastatic carcinoma (MC), 30 cases to identify the sites of metastatic unknown primary tumors and 16 cases were checked to confirm clinical suspicion of a specific MC. Accuracy to differentiate NHL from MC was 100%, 92.3% to identify a primary tumor site of MC, and 100% to confirm a clinical suspicion of a specific MC. In 7 cases, the site of the primary tumor remained clinically unknown. Application of immunocytochemical markers on the same slide used for microscopic diagnosis is a useful tool in the routine assessment of FNACs of lymph nodes.

9p21 Deletion in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions additional to immunocytochemistry, DNA-ICM, and AgNOR analysis.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma (MM) in serous effusions is difficult but may be achieved by the application of adjuvant methods. METHODS: The authors cytologically diagnosed 33 effusions as suspicious or positive for MM cells by using DNA-image cytometry (DNA-ICM), immunocytochemistry and AgNOR analysis. The authors further detected 9p21 deletions by chromosomal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In addition, 31 cases of metastatic carcinomas and 39 of tumor cell-negative effusions were investigated. All diagnoses were confirmed by histologic and/or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: DNA aneuploidy was found in 71% of MMs, 100% of metastatic carcinomas, and in none of the negative effusions. Calretinin was positive in 100% of MMs, in none of the metastatic carcinomas, and in 94.9% of negative effusions. BerEP4 showed positivity in 15.6% of MMs, 87.1% of metastatic carcinomas, and in none of the negative effusions. With AgNOR analysis, 89.3% of MMs and 96.7% of metastatic carcinomas showed >or=2.5 AgNOR dots as satellites and >or=4.5 as total AgNOR counts. 9p21 deletions were demonstrated in 90.9% of MM cases, 45.2% of metastatic carcinomas, and in none of the negative effusions. By cytology alone, 81.8% of MMs were identified unequivocally. Addition of DNA-ICM improved the prevalence of tumor cell detection to 87.9% and of AgNOR analysis to 97%. The introduction of 9p21 deletions by FISH improved this prevalence to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Because of these results, the authors propose the sequential application of immunocytochemistry, DNA-ICM, and AgNOR analysis to establish a cytological diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in serous effusions. In persistent doubtful diagnoses, the authors recommend fluorescence in situ hybridization to analyze the 9p21 deletion.

Immunocytochemical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and identification of carcinomas of unknown primary metastatic to the liver on fine-needle aspiration cytologies.

BACKGROUND: Difficulties with cytologic diagnoses on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the liver can be overcome by the application of immunocytochemical panels applied on smears. The aim of the current study was to analyze the performance of a panel of monoclonal antibodies to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic carcinoma (MC) or regenerative nodules, and to identify the to date unknown primary sites of carcinomas that had metastasized to the liver. METHODS: In a validating cohort study, 108 FNACs coin lesions in the liver were routinely evaluated applying immunocytochemistry as an ancillary method. All patients had confirmatory histologic and/or clinical follow-up. A total of 23 HCCs were analyzed for the distinction from MC or regenerative nodules applying a panel of HepPar1, alpha-fetoprotein, BerEP4, CD31, CD68, and Ki-67. A total of 85 cases of unknown primary tumor metastatic to the liver were used to identify the tumor sites applying a panel of CK5/6, CK7, CK20, CA 125, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and Cdx2. RESULTS: Typing accuracy to differentiate HCC from MC or regenerative nodules was 100% and 90.3%, respectively, to identify the primary tumor site of MC. In 23 cases, the site of the primary tumor remained clinically unknown. CONCLUSIONS: The application of immunocytochemical panels on the same slide used for microscopic diagnosis is a useful tool in the routine assessment of FNACs of the liver to discriminate HCCs from MC or regenerative nodules and for the identification of primary sites of MC. Their performance should be confirmed in a larger series of cases.

Immunocytochemical identification of carcinomas of unknown primary in serous effusions.

Metastases from carcinomas of unknown primary site (CUP) in serous effusion are a common clinical problem. Immunocytochemistry was applied as an adjunct to the cytological diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas in serous effusions. Subjects of this study were 118 pleural, 53 peritoneal, and 9 pericardial effusions from 180 patients routinely investigated in the Institute of Cytopathology. Specimens were primarily stained according to Papanicolaou (Pap). The avidin-biotin-complex method (ABC) was secondarily applied for the visualization of immunologic reactions. We have used a panel of six monoclonal antibodies (CK 5/6, CK 7, CK 20, CA 125, TTF-1, and cdx 2) so as to identify the primary tumor site of metastatic carcinoma cells in serous effusions. Applying an algorithm of immunocytochemical marker constellations, we were able to correctly diagnose primary tumor sites in 86 of 101 (85.1%) patients with CUP syndromes. The best result was achieved for the identification of metastatic carcinomas of the ovaries (94.7%) and the lungs (88.1%). We established an algorithm comprising six immunocytochemical markers that enabled a correct diagnosis of primary tumor sites in 85.1%. The panel studied could be useful in diagnostic routine for the identification of primary tumors of unknown origin metastatic to the serous membranes.

Diagnostic value of nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) in brush biopsies of suspicious lesions of the oral cavity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to report on the diagnostic accuracy of AgNOR-analysis as an adjunctive diagnostic tool of conventional oral exfoliative cytology taken from suspicious lesions in our clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Cytological diagnoses obtained from brush biopsies of macroscopically suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa from 75 patients (final diagnoses: 53 histologically proven squamous cell carcinomas, 11 leukoplakias and other inflammatory oral lesions) and from 11 patients with normal mucosa as a negative control group were compared with histological and/or clinical follow-ups. Five smears were doubtful and seven suspicious for tumor cells in the cytologic report. Number of AgNOR's were counted in 100 squamous epithelial cell-nuclei per slide after silver-restaining. RESULTS: Sensitivity of our cytological diagnosis alone on oral smears for the detection of squamous carcinomas was 92.5%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and negative 84.6%. The best cut-off value of the mean number of AgNOR dots per nucleus distinguishing benign from malignant cells was 4.8. The percentage of nuclei with more than three AgNORs had a cut-off level of 70%. Applying these methods to twelve doubtful or suspicious cytological diagnoses we were able to correctly establish the diagnosis of malignancy in ten cases of histologically proven cancers and to reveal benignity in two histologically proven cases. Thus we achieved a positive and negative predictive value of 100% each. CONCLUSIONS: Smears from brushings of visible oral lesions, if clinically considered as suspicious for cancer, are an easily practicable, non-invasive, painless, safe and accurate screening method for detection of oral cancerous lesions. We conclude that AgNOR-analysis may be a useful adjunct to other methods in routine cytological diagnosis of oral cancer that can help to solve cytologically suspicious or doubtful cases.