RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess perioperative and late performance of a silver acetate and triclosan impregnated antimicrobial vascular graft (Intergard Synergy, Intervascular SAS, La Ciotat, France) during open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), and to compare it with standard polyester grafts ones. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study (STAGER Study, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04557254) included patients undergone non-infectious AAA surgical repair between 2012 and 2019, divided into two groups according to the implanted aortic prosthesis: standard polyester graft (PolyG) and silver-triclosan graft (SynG). Early primary endpoints were 30-day mortality, major adverse events (MAEs), and reintervention rates; late primary endpoints were overall and aortic-related survival, reintervention-free survival, and graft infection rate at a mean follow-up (FU) of 49.4±26.8 months. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-seven patients were included [PolyG 49%, and SynG 51%]. Both groups were substantially homogeneous in risk factors and demographics. Two patients died within 30 days. In-hospital MAE rate [PolyG 14.2% vs. SynG 10.7%; P=.248] and 30-day reintervention rate were not significantly different [PolyG 2.6% vs. SynG 1.4%; P=.374]. At 5 years, overall survival in the PolyG and SynG groups were 85% and 84%, respectively. Reintervention-free survival was 82% for both groups. Aortic-related survival was 95% and 96%, respectively. Graft infection was observed in 8 (3.3%) PolyG patients and 5 (1.8%) SynG patients. CONCLUSIONS: Silver acetate and triclosan impregnated grafts demonstrated good early and mid-term results, being considered safe and durable for AAA open repair. Similar graft infection and related death rates were observed compared to polyester standard grafts, supporting non-superiority of one graft over the other.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Triclosan , Humanos , Triclosan/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Poliésteres , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare costs and effectiveness of elective open (OR) vs fenestrated/branched endovascular (ER) repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) in a high-volume center. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study (PRO-ENDO TAAA Study, NCT05266781) was designed as part of a larger health technology assessment analysis. All electively treated TAAAs between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed and propensity-matched. End points were clinical success, major adverse events (MAEs), hospital direct costs, and freedom from all causes and aneurysm-related mortality and reinterventions. Risk factors and outcomes were homogeneously classified according to the Society of Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Cost-effectiveness value and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated, considering the absence of MAEs as a measure of effectiveness. RESULTS: Propensity matching identified 102 pairs of patients out of 789 TAAAs. Mortality, MAE, permanent spinal cord ischemia rates, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, and renal injury were higher for OR (13% vs 5%, P = .048; 60% vs 17%, P < .001; 10% vs 3%, P = .045; 91% vs 18%, P < .001; 16% vs 6%, P = .024; 27% vs 6%, P < .001, respectively). Access complication rate (6% vs 27%; P < .001) was higher in the ER group. Intensive care unit stay was longer (P < .001) for OR, and ER patients were discharged home more frequently (3% vs 94%; P < .001). No differences in midterm end points were observed at 2 years. Despite ER reducing all the hospital cost items (-42% to -88%, P < .001), the higher expenses (P < .001) of the endovascular devices increased the overall cost of ER by 80%. Cost-effectiveness value for ER was favorable to OR (56,365 vs 64,903 /patient) with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 48,409 per MAE saved. CONCLUSIONS: ER of TAAA reduces perioperative mortality and morbidity compared with OR, with no differences in reinterventions and survival rates at midterm follow-up. Despite the expenses for endovascular grafts, ER was found to be more cost-effective in preventing MAEs.
Assuntos
Aneurisma , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Aneurisma/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Hospitais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Traumatism of head arteries is rare, but among them, the superficial temporal artery is the most exposed and less protected vessel. A pseudoaneurysm of the superficial temporal artery may occur after blunt head trauma in old patients or during vigorous activity in younger people. Diagnosis should be made primarily upon history and physical examination, while duplex ultrasound is appropriate to confirm the diagnosis and CT scan to exclude other possible concomitant pathologies. Direct surgical treatment is the first and main option to solve bleeding and prevent future complications. Here reported the case of an old woman treated for a post-traumatic STA pseudoaneurysm.